Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T04:29:55.589Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

YPSP01-04 - Training On How To Use The Intermed: The Experience At Modena Medical School

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 April 2020

E. Zannoni
Affiliation:
School of Nursing, University of Modena & Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
A. Bombi
Affiliation:
Institute of Psychiatry, University of Bologna, Bolgna, Italy
A. Bonati
Affiliation:
School of Nursing, University of Modena & Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
T. Delli Carri
Affiliation:
School of Nursing, University of Modena & Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
A. Disavoia
Affiliation:
Psychiatry, University of Modena & Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
S. Ferrari
Affiliation:
Psychiatry, University of Modena & Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
V. Mazzali
Affiliation:
School of Nursing, University of Modena & Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
E. Simoni
Affiliation:
Psychiatry, University of Modena & Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
P. Ferri
Affiliation:
School of Nursing, University of Modena & Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
F.J. Huyse
Affiliation:
Department of Internal Medicine, UMCG Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
M. Rigatelli
Affiliation:
Psychiatry, University of Modena & Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Objectives

INTERMED is an instrument to assess bio-psycho-social case complexity in general health care by focusing on past, present and future health needs and risks of patients. It consists in a structured interview defining 20 variables and related anchor points. The total score ranges from 0 to 60, reflecting the level of complexity and the related care needs/risks. The aim of this work was to describe the training process on the use of INTERMED and to assess its effectiveness.

Methods

A training group of 9 subjects had two-hour meetings twice a month between April and September 2009. After introductory sessions on theoretical aspects and inter-trainee simulations on interviewing and scoring techniques, students were assigned the task of producing video-recorded clinical material, which was used to comment on interviewing skills and practice on scoring. Individual and consensus scores were collected at the beginning and at the end of the training and compared statistically by means of Cohen's kappa.

Results

Motivation and involvement of students in the training was high (participation was on a voluntary basis during extra-work hours), as satisfaction. Agreement between individual and consensus scores was high already at the beginning of the training (Cohen's kappa mean value of 0.80) and slightly improved during the course.

Conclusions

The training process gave positive results both on the quantitative and the qualitative sides of evaluation. A six-month 25-hour training period is a reasonable time for learning how to master the instrument, although it needs to be followed by the clinical practice.

Type
YP Scholar poster
Copyright
Copyright © European Psychiatric Association 2010
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.