Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T00:43:38.117Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Case of Farmer Adaptation and Adoption of Contour Hedgerows for Soil Conservation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 October 2008

Sam Fujisaka
Sam Fujisaka
Affiliation:
International Rice Research Institute, Social Sciences, PO Box 933, Manila, Philippines
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

After farmer-to-farmer training, farmers at an upland research site in the Philippines adapted and adopted contour hedgerows over a period of four years. They developed hedgerow establishment methods that required less labour, eliminated grasses that were too competitive with crops, stopped planting trees that were initially intended to produce green manures, and planted species that might provide direct cash returns. The different systems they used controlled soil erosion equally and effectively, although grazing of hedgerows by neighbours’ cattle was a problem. The farmers who learned about the technology but who did not establish contour hedgerows on their farms were those who had a higher proportion of flat land and/or off -farm or non-farm income opportunities.

Type
Research Article
Information
Experimental Agriculture , Volume 29 , Issue 1 , January 1993 , pp. 97 - 105
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abujamin, S., Abbdurachman, A. & Suwardjo (1985). Contour grass strips as a low cost conservation practice. ASPAC Extension Bulletin 221:1–7.Google Scholar
ASOCON (1990). Contour: Newsletter of the Asia Soil Conservation Network 2:2. Jakarta: Asia Soil Conservation Network.Google Scholar
Fujisaka, S. (1989a). The need to incorporate farmer perspectives: lessons from a comparison of selected upland projects and policies. Agroforestry Systems 9:141–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fujisaka, S. (1989b). A method for farmer-participatory research and technology transfer: upland soil conservation in the Philippines. Experimental Agriculture 25:423–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garrity, D. P., Kummer, D. M. & Guiang, E. S. (in press). The upland ecosystem in the Philippines: alternatives for sustainable farming and forestry. In Agricultural Sustainability and the Environment in the Humid Tropics. Washington: National Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar
Getahun, A. & Njenga, A. (1990). Living stakes: Kenyan farmers introduce an agroforestry technology. Forest, Trees and People Newsletter 9, 10:38–39.Google Scholar
Grimshaw, R. G. (undated) Vetiver grass (Vetiveria zizanioides): a method of vegetative soil and moisture conservation. New Delhi: World Bank.Google Scholar
Hudson, N. W. (1971). Soil Conservation. London: Batsford.Google Scholar
Hudson, N. W. (1990). Soil conservation projects: success or failure? Contour 2:2:3–6.Google Scholar
Huxley, P. A. (1986). Rationalising Research on Hedgerow Intercropping: an Overview. Working Paper 40. Nairobi: International Council for Research on Agroforestry (ICRAF).Google Scholar
Kang, B. T. & Wilson, G. F. (1987). The development of alley cropping as a promising agroforestry technology. In Agroforestry: A Decade of Development (Eds Steppler, H. A. and Nair, P. K. R.). Nairobi: ICRAF.Google Scholar
Kuchelmeister, G. (1989). Hedges for Resource-Poor Land Users in Developing Countries. Eschborn, Germany: GTZ.Google Scholar
MacKay, K. (1990). Philippines. Sustainable Agriculture Newsletter 2:2:26–28.Google Scholar
Mercado, A., Montecalvo, A., Garrity, D. P. & Bashri, I. (1991). Contour hedgerow systems using Cassia spectabilis and their effect on upland rice and maize crops on sloping acid upland soils. Agroecology Unit Paper. Manila, Philippines: IRRI.Google Scholar
Pahlman, C. (1990). Farmers’ perception of the sustainability of upland farming systems in northern Thailand. The Sustainable Agriculture Newsletter 2:2:25–26.Google Scholar
Raintree, J. B. & Hoskins, M. W. (1988). Appropriate R & D Support for Forestry Extension. Paper for the FAO Consultation on Organization of Forestry Extension, Bangkok, March 7–11.Google Scholar
Ramirez, D. M. (1988). Indigenous Soil Conservation Strategies in Philippine Upland Farms. Working Paper 1. Environment and Policy Institute, East-West Center.Google Scholar
Roucheleau, D. E. (undated). The user perspective and the agroforestry research and action agenda. Nairobi: ICRAF.Google Scholar
Smyle, J. W. & Magrath, W. B. (1990). Vetiver grass-a hedge against erosion. Paper given at the American Society of Agronomy Annual Meetings,San Antonio, Texas,22 October 1990.Google Scholar
Tacio, H. D., Watson, H. R. & Laquihon, W. A. (1988). Nitrogen-fixing trees as multipurpose species for soil conservation. In Multipurpose Trees for Small Farm Use (Eds Withington, D., MacDicken, K. G., Sastry, G. B. and Adams, N. R.). Arlington, Virginia: Winrock International; Ottawa: International Development Research Centre.Google Scholar
Young, A. (1986). The Potential of Agroforestry for Soil Conservation. Part I. Erosion Control. Working Paper 42. Nairobi: ICRAF.Google Scholar
Young, A. (1987). The Potential of Agroforestry for Soil Conservation. Part II. Maintenance of Fertility. Working Paper 43. Nairobi: ICRAF.Google Scholar
UACP (Upland Agriculture and Conservation Project). (1987). Upland agriculture and conservation: research highlights 1985–86. Bogor: Indonesia Ministry of Agriculture and USAID.Google Scholar