Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T09:35:38.082Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

IMPROVING THE FOOD SECURITY OF LOW-RESOURCE FARMERS: INTRODUCING HORSEGRAM INTO MAIZE-BASED CROPPING SYSTEMS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 2008

J. R. WITCOMBE ,
M. BILLORE ,
H. C. SINGHAL ,
N. B. PATEL ,
S. B. S. TIKKA ,
D. P. SAINI ,
L. K. SHARMA ,
R. SHARMA ,
S. K. YADAV  and
J. P. YADAVENDRA
J. R. WITCOMBE*
Affiliation:
CAZS Natural Resources, Bangor University, Gwynedd, LL57 2UW, UK
M. BILLORE
Affiliation:
Jawaharlal Nerhu Krishi Vishwa Vidhyalaya, College of Agriculture, Indore
H. C. SINGHAL
Affiliation:
Jawaharlal Nerhu Krishi Vishwa Vidhyalaya, College of Agriculture, Indore
N. B. PATEL
Affiliation:
Main Pulses Research Station, Sardarkrushinagar Dantiwada Agricultural University, Sardarkrushinagar, Gujarat
S. B. S. TIKKA
Affiliation:
Main Pulses Research Station, Sardarkrushinagar Dantiwada Agricultural University, Sardarkrushinagar, Gujarat
D. P. SAINI
Affiliation:
Maharana Pratap University of Agriculture & Technology, Udaipur, Agricultural Research Station, Banswara
L. K. SHARMA
Affiliation:
Maharana Pratap University of Agriculture & Technology, Udaipur, Agricultural Research Station, Banswara
R. SHARMA
Affiliation:
Gramin Vikas Trust, 143 Taldar Building, College Road, Banswara
S. K. YADAV
Affiliation:
Gramin Vikas Trust, Kanchankunj, Chakaliya Road, Dahod, Gujarat
J. P. YADAVENDRA
Affiliation:
Gramin Vikas Trust, Kanchankunj, Chakaliya Road, Dahod, Gujarat
*
†Corresponding author: j.r.witcombe@bangor.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

In the hilly areas of eastern Gujarat, western Madhya Pradesh and southern Rajasthan, in western India, farmers are very resource-poor and cultivate small and fragmented land holdings. Maize is their main rainy season (kharif) cereal and it is grown as a rainfed crop in low-fertility fields, often on sloping land that is vulnerable to soil erosion. Its productivity is very low, averaging below 1 t ha−1. New farm technologies to increase this productivity have to be low cost to be attractive to farmers who have limited access to purchased inputs and few means to purchase them. From observations of local farming practices, intercropping of maize with legumes was identified as an attractive option because the only additional input needed is seed of the legume crop. Participatory research was conducted on intercropping of maize with improved varieties of horsegram (Macrotyloma uniflorum). Many farmers who tried this intercropping adopted it in subsequent years, while others preferred to grow the new horsegram varieties as a sole crop. Farmers reported that less weeding was required in the intercrop as the horsegram smothered weeds. All farmers used the dry stover from the horsegram as a fodder for their animals. Farmers used the whole seed as dal, which provided additional protein in their diet. Farmers also sold the grain, but it fetched a low price in the poorly developed market for horsegram. Previously intercropping had been tried with local landraces, but the acceptance of intercropping was higher with new varieties such as AK-42 that yielded over 60% more grain. Participatory trials in which only one entry was compared with the local variety did not show a difference between AK-21 and AK-42 as in all cases both were preferred over the local variety. When they were directly compared with each other, farmers' perceptions showed a significant preference for AK-42. Variety IVH-2 was found to be better than AK-42: it matured 15 days earlier, better matching the maturity of the maize, had superior grain quality and yielded about the same. The greater uptake of improved horsegram varieties for sole and intercropping is likely to be limited by the lack of seed supply.

Type
Research Article
Information
Experimental Agriculture , Volume 44 , Issue 3 , July 2008 , pp. 339 - 348
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bravo, L., Siddhuraju, P. and Saura-Calixto, F. (1999). Composition of underexploited Indian pulses. Comparisons with common legumes. Food Chemistry 64:185–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gupta, D. N., Parab, A. A., Mehta, H. R. and Goyal, R. (2001). Evaluation of nutritive value of promising genotypes of pigeonpea and horsegram in Konkan. Journal of Phytological Research 4:143–146.Google Scholar
Joshi, A. and Witcombe, J. R. (1996). Farmer participatory crop improvement. II: Participatory varietal selection, a case study in India. Experimental Agriculture 32:461–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MINITAB (2003). Meet MINITAB 14 for Windows. USA.Google Scholar
Snapp, S. (1999). Mother and baby trials: a novel trial design being tried out in Malawi. In TARGET. The Newsletter of the Soil Fertility Research Network for Maize-Based Cropping Systems in Malawi and Zimbabwe. Jan. 1999 issue. CIMMYT, Zimbabwe.Google Scholar
Snedecor, G. W. and Cochran, W. G. (1973). Statistical Methods, 6th edition. Ames, IA, USA: Iowa State University Press.Google Scholar
Virk, D. S., Chakraborty, M., Ghosh, J. and Harris, D. (2006). Participatory evaluation of horsegram (Macrotyloma uniflorum) varieties and their on-station responses to on-farm seed priming in eastern India. Experimental Agriculture 42:411–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Virk, D. S., Singh, D. N., Kumar, R., Prasad, S. C., Gangwar, J. S. and Witcombe, J. R. (2003). Collaborative and consultative participatory plant breeding or rice for the rainfed uplands of eastern India. Euphytica 132:95–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Witcombe, J. R., Joshi, A., Joshi, K. D. and Sthapit, B. R. (1996). Farmer participatory crop improvement. I: Methods for varietal selection and breeding and their impact on biodiversity. Experimental Agriculture 32:445–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Witcombe, J. R., Joshi, A. and Goyal, S.N. (2003). Participatory plant breeding in maize: A case study from Gujarat, India. Euphytica 130: 413–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Witcombe, J. R., Joshi, K. D., Gyawali, S., Musa, A. M., Johansen, C., Virk, D. S. and Sthapit, B. R. (2005). Participatory plant breeding is better described as highly client-oriented plant breeding. I. Four indicators of client-orientation in plant breeding. Experimental Agriculture 41:299–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar