Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T22:06:39.926Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Phosphorus cycling by Urochloa decumbens intercropped with coffee

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 September 2022

João Leonardo Corte Baptistella Open the ORCID record for João Leonardo Corte Baptistella [Opens in a new window] ,
Ana Paula Bettoni Teles Open the ORCID record for Ana Paula Bettoni Teles [Opens in a new window] ,
José Laércio Favarin Open the ORCID record for José Laércio Favarin [Opens in a new window] ,
Paulo Sergio Pavinato Open the ORCID record for Paulo Sergio Pavinato [Opens in a new window]  and
Paulo Mazzafera Open the ORCID record for Paulo Mazzafera [Opens in a new window]
João Leonardo Corte Baptistella*
Affiliation:
Crop Science Department, “Luiz de Queiroz” College of Agriculture, University of São Paulo, ESALQ/USP, Piracicaba, SP, Brazil
Ana Paula Bettoni Teles
Affiliation:
Soil Science Department, “Luiz de Queiroz” College of Agriculture, University of São Paulo, ESALQ/USP, Piracicaba, SP, Brazil
José Laércio Favarin
Affiliation:
Crop Science Department, “Luiz de Queiroz” College of Agriculture, University of São Paulo, ESALQ/USP, Piracicaba, SP, Brazil
Paulo Sergio Pavinato
Affiliation:
Soil Science Department, “Luiz de Queiroz” College of Agriculture, University of São Paulo, ESALQ/USP, Piracicaba, SP, Brazil
Paulo Mazzafera
Affiliation:
Crop Science Department, “Luiz de Queiroz” College of Agriculture, University of São Paulo, ESALQ/USP, Piracicaba, SP, Brazil Department of Plant Biology, Institute of Biology, State University of Campinas, Campinas, SP, Brazil
*
*Corresponding author. Email: joaolcbaptistella@gmail.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Phosphorus (P) is a limiting resource for agricultural production in the tropics. Urochloa spp. is commonly used as a cover crop and has mechanisms to mobilize partially the nonavailable P forms from the soil. The use of Urochloa intercropped with Arabica coffee (Coffea arabica L.) is increasing in Brazil, but P cycling has been overlooked in this system. Here, we proposed two experiments to test the hypothesis that Urochloa decumbens could mobilize and absorb P from deep soil layers and increase overall P cycling of the intercrop system. We measured U. decumbens root and shoot dry mass (SDM), root morphology and activity, nutrient uptake, soil nutrient availability, and soil P fractionation in both experiments. To better understand P cycling by Urochloa alone, in the first experiment, U. decumbens was cultivated in rhizotrons where adequate P was supplied in distinct soil layers – 0.0 to 0.3 m, 0.3 to 0.8 m, 0.8 to 1.3 m, and 1.3 to 2 m. Root dry mass (RDM) and morphology were not affected by P availability. Moreover, total biomass production (root plus shoot) and P uptake were higher when P was available in the superficial top soil layer compared to P availability in more than one layer or only in the bottom layer. Nevertheless, U. decumbens was able to reach and acquire P from depth. Correlation analysis showed that P cycling was strongly dependent on SDM, labile, and moderately labile fractions of soil P and was not significantly correlated with RDM. The second experiment aimed at verifying P uptake and mobilization from different soil depths in field conditions. P was supplied in different depths of the soil profile – 0.3 m, 0.6 m, and 0.9 m – in the field with preestablished U. decumbens intercropped with Arabica coffee plants. Shoot P content was higher at the first sample date when P was supplied at 0.3 m, compared to 0.6 m, 0.9 m, and control with no P. Soil P fractionation showed that there was no P mobilization of less labile forms by U. decumbens during the evaluated time. Our results showed that P fertilization in the top layer rather than suppling P trough the soil profile can maximize U. decumbens growth. Also, Urochloa P accumulation was enough to support coffee demand even in high yields and can be an alternative to increase P use efficiency in coffee production systems, being an effective recycler of P.

Keywords

Nutrient cyclingIntercropRoot architectureRhizotronSoil P fractionation
Type
Research Article
Information
Experimental Agriculture , Volume 58 , 2022 , e36
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Almeida, D.S., Rocha, K.F., De Souza, M., Delai, L.B. and Rosolem, C.A. (2018). Soil phosphorus bioavailability and soybean grain yield impaired by Ruzigrass. Agronomy Journal 110, 654–663.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Almeida, D.S. and Rosolem, C.A. (2016). Ruzigrass grown in rotation with soybean increases soil labile phosphorus. Agronomy Journal 108, 2444–2452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arroyave, C., Tolrà, R., Thuy, T., Barceló, J. and Poschenrieder, C. (2013). Differential aluminum resistance in Brachiaria species. Environmental and Experimental Botany 89, 11–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baptistella, J.L.C., de Andrade, S.A.L., Favarin, J.L. and Mazzafera, P. (2020). Urochloa in tropical agroecosystems. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems 4, 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baptistella, J.L.C., Llerena, J. P. P., Domingues-Júnior, A.P., Fernie, A.R., Favarin, J.L. and Mazzafera, P. (2021). Differential responses of three Urochloa species to low phosphorus availability. Annals of Applied Biology 179, 216–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
CONAB. (2021). Acompanhamento da safra Brasileira. Companhia Nacional de Abastecimento: Acompanhamento Da Safra Brasileira 7, 1–89.Google Scholar
Condron, L.M., Goh, K.M. and Newman, R.H. (1985). Nature and distribution of soil phosphorus as revealed by a sequential extraction method followed by 31P nuclear magnetic resonance analysis. Journal of Soil Science 36, 199–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, J., Lombardi, R., Boardman, D. and Carliell-Marquet, C. (2011). The future distribution and production of global phosphate rock reserves. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 57, 78–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Costa, C.H.M.D., Crusciol, C.A.C., Soratto, R.P. and Ferrari, N.J. (2016). Taxas de decomposição e liberação de nutrientes da fitomassa de milheto, capim colonião e capim-braquiária. Bioscience Journal 32, 1191–1203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Costa, N.R., Andreotti, M., Buzetti, S., Lopes, K.S.M. and Santos, F.G.D. and Pariz, C.M. (2014). Acúmulo de macronutrientes e decomposição da palhada de braquiárias em razão da adubação nitrogenada durante e após o consórcio com a cultura do milho. Revista Brasileira de Ciencia Do Solo 38, 1223–1233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cross, A.F. and Schlesinger, W.H. (1995). A literature review and evaluation of the. Hedley fractionation: applications to the biogeochemical cycle of soil phosphorus in natural ecosystems. Geoderma 64, 197–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dick, W.A. and Tabatabai, M.A. (1977). Determination of orthophosphate in aqueous solutions containing labile organic and inorganic phosphorus compounds. Journal of Environmental Quality 6, 82–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
do Valle, C.B., Macedo, M.C.M., Euclides, V.P.B., Jank, L. and Resende, R.M.S. (2011). Gênero brachiaria. In Fonseca, D.M.D. and Martuscello, J.A. (eds), Plantas Forrageiras. Viçosa: Universidade Federal de Viçosa, pp. 30–77.Google Scholar
Favarin, J.L., Souza, L.T.D., Moscardini, D.B. and Baptistella, J.L.C. (2018). Caminhos para aumentar a produtividade do café arábica. Infomações Agronômicas 164, 13–18.Google Scholar
Fitter, A.H. (1986). Spatial and temporal patterns of root activity in a species-rich alluvial grassland. Oecologia 69, 594–599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foltran, E.C., Rocha, J.H.T., Bazani, J.H., Gonçalves, J.L.M., Rodrigues, M., Pavinato, P.S., Valduga, G.R., Erro, J. and Garcia-Mina, J.M. (2019). Phosphorus pool responses under different P inorganic fertilizers for a eucalyptus plantation in a loamy Oxisol. Forest Ecology and Management 435, 170–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Furlan, F., Rabêlo, F.H.S., Rossi, M.L., Martinelli, A.P., Azevedo, R.A. and Lavres, J. (2018). Aluminum-induced stress differently modifies Urochloa genotypes responses on growth and regrowth: root-to-shoot Al-translocation and oxidative stress. Theoretical and Experimental Plant Physiology 30, 141–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gatiboni, L.C., Kaminski, J., Rheinheimer, D.D.S. and Flores, J.P.C. (2007). Biodisponibilidade de formas de fósforo acumuladas em solo sob sistema plantio direto. Revista Brasileira de Ciência Do Solo 31, 691–699.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hedley, M.J., Stewart, J.W.B. and Chauhan, B.S. (1982). Changes in inorganic and organic soil phosphorus fractions induced by cultivation practices and by laboratory incubations1. Soil Science Society of America Journal 46, 970.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holanda, F.S.R., Mengel, D.B., Paula, M.B., Carvaho, J.G. and Bertoni, J.C. (1998). Influence of crop rotations and tillage systems on phosphorus and potassium stratification and root distribution in the soil profile. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 29, 2383–2394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Janegitz, M.C., Inoue, B.S. and Rosolem, C.A. (2013). Formas de fósforo no solo após o cultivo de braquiária e tremoço branco. Ciência Rural 43, 1381–1386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnston, A.E., Poulton, P.R., Fixen, P.E. and Curtin, D. (2014). Phosphorus: its efficient use in agriculture. In Sparks, D.L. (ed), Advances in Agronomy. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Academic Press, pp. 177–228.Google Scholar
Kanno, T., Macedo, M.C. and Bono, J.A. (1999). Growth responses of Brachiaria decumbens cv. Basilisk and Brachiaria brizantha cv. Marandu to Phosphorus Supply. Japanese Journal of Grassland Science 45, 1–8.Google Scholar
Liao, H., Rubio, G., Yan, X., Cao, A., Brown, K.M. and Lynch, J.P. (2001). Effect of phosphorus availability on basal root shallowness in common bean. Plant and Soil 232, 69–79.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Linquist, B.A., Singleton, P.W. and Cassman, K.G. (1997). Inorganic and organic phosphorus dynamics during a build-up and decline of available phosphorus in an ultisol. Soil Science 162, 254–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, Y. and Chen, J. (2014). Phosphorus cycle. In Fath, B. (ed), Encyclopedia of Ecology. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier, pp. 181–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Louw-Gaume, A.E., Rao, I.M., Gaume, A.J. and Frossard, E. (2010). A comparative study on plant growth and root plasticity responses of two Brachiaria forage grasses grown in nutrient solution at low and high phosphorus supply. Plant and Soil 328, 155–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Louw-Gaume, A.E., Schweizer, N., Rao, I.M., Gaume, A.J. and Frossard, E. (2017). Temporal differences in plant growth and root exudation of two Brachiaria grasses in response to low phosphorus supply. Tropical Grasslands-Forrajes Tropicales 5, 103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Magalhaes, J.V., Piñeros, M.A., Maciel, L.S. and Kochian, L.V. (2018). Emerging pleiotropic mechanisms underlying aluminum resistance and phosphorus acquisition on acidic soils. Frontiers in Plant Science 9, 1–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Malavolta, E. (1993). Nutrição Mineral e Adubação do Cafeeiro. São Paulo, SP: Agronômica Ceres.Google Scholar
Malavolta, E., Vitti, G.C. and Oliveira, S.A.D. (1997). Avaliação do Estado Nutricional das Plantas: Princípios e Aplicações, 2nd Edn. Piracicaba, SP: Potafos.Google Scholar
Mennan, H., Jabran, K., Zandstra, B.H. and Pala, F. (2020). Non-chemical weed management in vegetables by using cover crops: a review. Agronomy 10, 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Momesso, L., Crusciol, C.A.C., Soratto, R.P., Vyn, T.J., Tanaka, K.S., Costa, C.H.M., Ferrari-Neto, J. and Cantarella, H. (2019). Impacts of nitrogen management on no-till maize production following forage cover crops. Agronomy Journal 111, 639–649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murphy, J. and Riley, J.P. (1962). A modified single solution method for the determination of phosphate in natural waters. Analytica Chimica Acta 27, 31–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olsen, S.R. and Sommers, L.E. (1982). Phosphorus. In Page, A.L. (ed), Methods of Soil Analysis Part 2 Chemical and Microbiological Properties. Madison, WI: Soil Science Society of America, pp. 403–430.Google Scholar
Osipitan, O.A., Dille, J.A., Assefa, Y., Radicetti, E., Ayeni, A. and Knezevic, S.Z. (2019). Impact of cover crop management on level of weed suppression: a meta-analysis. Crop Science 59, 833–842.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pavinato, P.S., Cherubin, M.R., Soltangheisi, A., Rocha, G.C., Chadwick, D.R. and Jones, D.L. (2020). Revealing soil legacy phosphorus to promote sustainable agriculture in Brazil. Scientific Reports 10, 1–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pedrosa, A.W. (2013). Eficiência da Adubação Nitrogenada no Consórcio Entre Cafeeiro e Brachiaria Brizantha.Google Scholar
Quaggio, J.A., Mattos, D. Jr. and Boaretto, R.M. (2018). Recomendações para calagem e adubação de citros. In Cantarella, H., Quaggio, J.A., Mattos, D. Jr., Boaretto, R.M. and Raij, B.V. (eds), I Simpósio Sobre os Avanços na Nutrição de Citros e Café – Boletim 100. Campinas - SP - Brazil, pp. 7.Google Scholar
Ragassi, C.F., Pedrosa, A.W. and Favarin, J.L. (2013). Aspectos positivos e riscos no consórcio cafeeiro e braquiária. Revista Visão Agrícola 12, 29–32.Google Scholar
Rao, I.M., Kerridge, P.C. and Macedo, M.C.M. (1996). Nutritional requirements of brachiaria and adaptation to acid soils. In Miles, J.W., Maass, B.L., do Valle, C.B. and Kumble, V. (eds), Brachiaria: Biology, Agronomy and Improvement. Cali: Centro Internacional de Agricultura Tropical, pp. 288.Google Scholar
Rodrigues, M., Pavinato, P.S., Withers, P.J.A., Teles, A.P.B. and Herrera, W.F.B. (2016). Legacy phosphorus and no tillage agriculture in tropical oxisols of the Brazilian savanna. Science of the Total Environment 542, 1050–1061.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rosolem, C.A., Merlin, A. and Bull, J.C.L. (2014). Soil phosphorus dynamics as affected by Congo grass and P fertilizer. Scientia Agricola 71, 309–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosolem, C.A. and Pivetta, L.A. (2017). Mechanical and biological approaches to alleviate soil compaction in tropical soils: assessed by root growth and activity (Rb uptake) of soybean and maize grown in rotation with cover crops. Soil Use and Management 33, 141–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silva, H.M.S.D., Dubeux, J.C.B., Silveira, M.L., dos Santos, M.V.F., de Freitas, E.V. and de Andrade Lira, M. (2019). Root decomposition of grazed signalgrass in response to stocking and nitrogen fertilization rates. Crop Science 59, 811–818.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soil Science Society of America. (2008). Glossary of Soil Science Terms. Madison, WI: Soil Science Society of America.Google Scholar
Soil Survey Staff. (1999). Soil Taxonomy: A Basic System of Soil Classification for Making and Interpreting Soil Surveys, 2nd Edn. Washington, DC: Natural Resources Conservation Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture.Google Scholar
Souza, L.T.D. (2018). Nutrient Demand for Vegetation and Fruiting of Coffea Arabica.Google Scholar
Tanaka, K.S., Crusciol, C.A.C., Soratto, R.P., Momesso, L., Costa, C.H.M., Franzluebbers, A.J., Junior, A.O. and Calonego, J.C. (2019). Nutrients released by Urochloa cover crops prior to soybean. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems 113, 267–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teutscherova, N., Vazquez, E., Arevalo, A., Pulleman, M., Rao, I. and Arango, J. (2019). Differences in arbuscular mycorrhizal colonization and P acquisition between genotypes of the tropical Brachiaria grasses: is there a relation with BNI activity? Biology and Fertility of Soils 55, 325–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tezotto, T., Favarin, J.L., Azevedo, R.A., Alleoni, L.R.F. and Mazzafera, P. (2012). Coffee is highly tolerant to cadmium, nickel and zinc: plant and soil nutritional status, metal distribution and bean yield. Field Crops Research 125, 25–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
USDA. (2020). Coffee: World Markets and Trade.Google Scholar
USEPA. (1971). Methods for Chemical Analysis of Water and Wastes. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Werner, J.C., Paulino, V.T., Cantarella, H., Andrade, N.D.O. and Quaggio, J.A. (1997). Forrageiras. In Van, R.B., Cantarella, H., Quaggio, J.A. and Furlani, A.M.C. (eds), Boletim Técnico 100 – Recomendações de Adubação e Calagem Para o Estado de São Paulo. Campinas: IAC/Fundag, pp. 261–276.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Baptistella et al. supplementary material

Baptistella et al. supplementary material

Download Baptistella et al. supplementary material(File)
File 12 MB