Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T00:25:21.021Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

THE RATIO OF CO2–C EMISSION TO GRAIN YIELD IN SUMMER MAIZE CULTIVATED UNDER DIFFERENT SOIL TILLAGE AND STRAW APPLICATION CONDITIONS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 April 2016

HUI FANG HAN ,
TANG YUAN NING ,
ZENG JIA LI  and
HONG MING CAO
HUI FANG HAN
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of Crop Biology, Shandong Key Laboratory of Crop Biology, Shandong Agricultural University, Tai'an 271018, Shandong, P.R. China
TANG YUAN NING
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of Crop Biology, Shandong Key Laboratory of Crop Biology, Shandong Agricultural University, Tai'an 271018, Shandong, P.R. China
ZENG JIA LI*
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of Crop Biology, Shandong Key Laboratory of Crop Biology, Shandong Agricultural University, Tai'an 271018, Shandong, P.R. China
HONG MING CAO
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of Crop Biology, Shandong Key Laboratory of Crop Biology, Shandong Agricultural University, Tai'an 271018, Shandong, P.R. China
*
†Corresponding author. Email: hhf@sdau.edu.cn
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The relationship between climate, crop growth and crop yield is complicated. This study aimed to determine the ratio of CO2–C emission to grain yield, the field treatments were initiated in 2003, but the measurements for this analysis were collected during the summer maize-growing seasons of 2011 and 2012 in the North China Plain. The experiment showed that conventional tillage with straw application significantly increased grain yield and the ratio of CO2–C emission to grain yield of summer maize. The mean soil CO2–C emission rate with no tillage was significantly lower than that when conventional tillage was used; however, straw application significantly increased the soil CO2–C emission rate, irrespective of whether tillage was performed or not. This was mainly because straw application changed the soil total porosity and organic carbon content. In conclusion, the results of this study support the hypothesis that the ratio of CO2–C emission to grain yield in the North China Plain can be increased by straw application, whereas no tillage decreases this ratio.

Type
Research Article
Information
Experimental Agriculture , Volume 53 , Issue 1 , January 2017 , pp. 118 - 130
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bao, S. D. (2000). Chemical Analysis for Agricultural Soil. Beijing, P.R. China: China Agriculture Press, 30–68.Google Scholar
Bond-Lamberty, B. and Thomson, A. (2010). Temperature-associated increases in the global soil respiration record. Nature 464:579–582.Google Scholar
Bond-Lamberty, B. and Thomson, A. (2010). Temperature-associated increases in the global soil respiration record. Nature 464: 579–582.Google Scholar
Caldeira, K., Morgan, M. G., Baldocchi, D., Brewer, P. G., Chen, C. T. A., Nabulus, G. J., Nakicenovic, N. and Robertson, G. P. (2004). A portfolio of carbon management options. In The Global Carbon Cycle, 103–109 (Eds. Field, C. B. and Raupach, M. R.). Washington, DC, USA: Island Press.Google Scholar
Chen, F. and Xie, Z. H. (2012). Effects of crop growth and development on regional climate: a case study over East Asian monsoon area. Climate Dynamics 38:2291–2305.Google Scholar
Chen, Y., Liu, S., Li, H., Li, X. F., Song, C. Y., Cruse, R. M. and Zhang, X. Y. (2011). Effects of conservation tillage on corn and soybean yield in the humid continental climate region of Northeast China. Soil and Tillage Research 115–116:56–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cure, D. and Acock, B. (1986). Crop responses to carbon dioxide doubling: a literature survey. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 38:127–145.Google Scholar
David, A. N. U. and Rattan, L. (2009). Long-term tillage effects on soil carbon storage and carbon dioxide emissions in continuous corn cropping system from an Alison in Ohio. Soil and Tillage Research 104:39–47.Google Scholar
David, A. N. U., Rattan, L. and Marek, K. J. (2009). Nitrous oxide and methane emissions from long-term tillage under a continuous corn cropping system in Ohio. Soil and Tillage Research 104:247–255.Google Scholar
Dyck, M. F. and Kachanoski, R. G. (2011). Scale-dependent covariance of soil physical properties above and below a soil horizon interface: Pedogenicversus anthropogenic influences on total porosity. Canadian Journal of Soil Science 91:149–159.Google Scholar
Fabrizzi, K. P., Garcia, F. O., Costa, J. L. and Picone, L. I. (2005). Soil water dynamics, physical properties and corn and wheat responses to minimum and no-tillage systems in the southern Pampas of Argentina. Soil and Tillage Research 81:57–69.Google Scholar
Fabrizzi, K. P., García, F. O., Costa, J. L. and Picone, L. I. (2005). Soil water dynamics, physical properties and corn and wheat responses to minimum and no-tillage systems in the southern Pampas of Argentina. Soil and Tillage Research 81:57–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guan, Q., Wang, J., Song, S. Y. and Liu, W. Z. (2011). Effects of different mulching measures on winter wheat field soil respiration in Loess plateau dry land region. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology 22:1471–1476.Google Scholar
Halvorson, A. D., Wienhold, B. J. and Black, A. L. (2002). Tillage, nitrogen, and cropping system effects on soil carbon sequestration. Soil Science Society of American Journal 66:906–912.Google Scholar
Holland, J. M. (2004). The environmental consequences of adopting conservation tillage in Europe: Reviewing the evidence. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 103:1–25.Google Scholar
Jarecki, M. K. and Lal, R. (2006).Compost and mulch effects on gaseous flux from an alfisol in Ohio. Soil Science 171:249–260.Google Scholar
Jia, S. X., Zhang, X. P., Chen, X. W., Mclaughlin, N. B., Zhang, S. X., Wei, S. C., Sun, B. J. and Liang, A. Z. (2015). Long-term conservation tillage influences the soil microbial community and its contribution to soil CO2 emissions in a Mollisol in Northeast China. Journal of Soils and Sediments. DOI 10.1007/s11368-015-1158-7.Google Scholar
John, M. B., Tyson, E. O., Rodney, T. V. and Timothy, J. G. (2007). Tillage and soil carbon sequestration—What do we really know?. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 118:1–5.Google Scholar
Kimball, B. A., Morris, C. F., Pinter, J. P. J., Wall, G. W., Hunsaker, D. J., Adamsen, F. J., La, M. R. L., Leavitt, W., Thompson, T. L., Matthias, A. D. and Brooks, T. J. (2001). Elevated CO2, drought and soil nitrogen effects on wheat grain quality. New Phytologist 150:295–303.Google Scholar
Lenka, N. K. and Lal, R. (2013). Soil aggregation and greenhouse gas flux after 15 years of wheat straw and fertilizer management in a no-till system. Soil and Tillage Research 126:78–89. doi:10.1016/j.still.2012.08.011.Google Scholar
Liu, Q. R., Liu, X. H., Bian, C. Y., Ma, C. J., Lang, K., Han, H. F. and Li, Q. Q. (2014). Response of soil CO2 emission and summer maize yield to plant density and straw mulching in the North China plain. The Scientific World Journal. 1–8.Google Scholar
Osozawa, S. and Hasegawa, S. (1995). Daily and seasonal changes in soil carbon dioxide concentration and flux in Andisol. Soil Science 160:117–124.Google Scholar
Raich, J. W. and Tufekcioglu, A. (2000). Vegetation and soil respiration: correlations and controls. Biogeochemistry 48:71–90.Google Scholar
Sainju, U. M., Lenssen, A., Caesar-Thonthat, T. and Waddell, J. (2006). Carbon sequestration in dryland soils and plant residue as influenced by tillage and crop rotation. Journal of Environmental Quality 35:1341–1347.Google Scholar
Sarkar, S., Paramanick, M. and Goswami, S. B. (2007). Soil temperature, water use and yield of yellow sarson (Brassica napus L. var. glauca) in relation to tillage intensity and mulch management under rainfed lowland ecosystem in eastern India. Soil and Tillage Research 93:94–101.Google Scholar
Shen, J. Y., Zhao, D. D., Han, H. F., Zhou, X. B. and Li, Q. Q. (2012). Effects of straw mulching on water consumption characteristics and yield of different types of summer maize plants. Plant, Soil and Environment 58:161–166.Google Scholar
Sun, X. H., Zhang, R. Z., Cai, L. Q. and Chen, Q. Q. (2009). Effects of different tillage measures on upland soil respiration in loess plateau. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology 20:2173–2180.Google Scholar
Supit, I., Diepen, van C. A., Wit, de A. J. W., Wolf, J., Kabat, P., Baruth, B. and Ludwig, F. (2012). Assessing climate change effects on European crop yields using the crop growth. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 164:96–111.Google Scholar
Tang, Y. F., Wang, G. B. and Ruan, H. H. (2008). A review on the sensitivity of soil respiration to temperature. Journal of Nanjing Forest University (Natural Science) 32:124–128.Google Scholar
Vogeler, I., Horn, R., Wetzel, H. and Krümmelbein, J. (2006). Tillage effects on soil strength and solute transport. Soil and Tillage Research 88:19–204.Google Scholar
Xie, H. H., Fan, J., Qi, L. B. and Hao, M. D. (2010). Seasonal characteristics of soil respiration and affecting factors under typical vegetations in the water-wind erosion crisscross region of the loess Plateau. Environmental Science 31:2995–3003.Google Scholar
Yu, H. Y., Peng, W. Y., Ma, X. and Zhang, K. L. (2011). Effects of no-tillage on soil water content and physical properties of spring corn field in semiarid region of northern China. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology 22:99–104.Google Scholar
Zhang, P., Li, Q. Y., Yu, L., Shi, F. G. and Cheng, Z. L. (2008). The influence of the mulching straw on growth and yield of winter wheat. Journal of Shandong University of Technology (Natural Science) 22: 48–51.Google Scholar
Zhang, Q. B., Yang, L., Sun, B., Zhang, W. F., Luo, H. H., Zhang, Y. L. and Wang, J. (2012). Respiration characteristics of cotton soil under irrigation and fertilization measures in arid region. Transactions of the CSAE 28:77–84.Google Scholar