Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T01:33:20.421Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Assets need audiences: How venture capitalists boost valuations by recruiting investors to asset circles

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 November 2023

Dave Elder-Vass
Dave Elder-Vass*
Affiliation:
Loughborough University, UK
*
Corresponding author: Dave Elder-Vass, Loughborough University, Ashby Road, Loughborough, LE11 3TU, UK. Email: d.elder-vass@lboro.ac.uk.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Narratives and conventions have received considerable attention in recent discussions of the valuation of financial assets. Narratives and conventions, however, can only be effective to the extent that they attract and persuade audiences, and this article makes the case for paying more attention to those audiences. In particular, the article argues that financial assets can only be established as assets if there is a group of potential investors that has been persuaded to accept them as such: to take them seriously as potential investments. The article coins the term asset circles to refer to such groups and supports the argument with a discussion of venture capital and its role in the production of unicorns: private companies with extraordinary valuations. Venture capital firms may be thought of as value entrepreneurs, and much of the venture capital process is oriented towards constructing both value narratives for the companies they invest in and asset circles prepared to accept those value narratives. Their aim in these processes is a profitable exit, in which the venture capital firm converts its investment back into cash at a considerable profit through either an acquisition or a flotation.

Keywords

Venture capitalvaluationIPOconventionsasset circlesassetisation
Type
Article
Information
Finance and Society , Volume 7 , Issue 1 , 2021 , pp. 1 - 19
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-No Derivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits noncommercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
© 2021 The Author(s)

References

Aspers, P. and Beckert, J. (2010) Value in markets. In: Beckert, J. and Aspers, P. (eds.) The Worth of Goods: Valuation and Pricing in the Economy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 3–38.Google Scholar
Barman, E. (2015) Of principle and principal: Value plurality in the market of Impact Investing. Valuation Studies, 3(1): 9–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BBC (2011) Thousands ‘told Sid’ 25 years ago. BBC News, 21 November. Available at: <http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-15792873>. Accessed 4 October 2017..+Accessed+4+October+2017.>Google Scholar
BBC (2014) Xiaomi most valuable tech start-up. BBC News, 30 December. Available at: <https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-30629883>. Accessed 4 June 2018..+Accessed+4+June+2018.>Google Scholar
Beckert, J. (2016) Imagined Futures: Fictional Expectations and Capitalist Dynamics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birch, K. (2017) Rethinking value in the bio-economy: Finance, assetization, and the management of value. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 42(3): 460–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Birch, K. and Muniesa, F. (2020a) Introduction: Assetization and technoscientific capitalism. In: Birch, K. and Muniesa, F. (eds.) Assetization: Turning Things into Assets in Technoscientific Capitalism. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birch, K. and Muniesa, F. (eds.) (2020b) Assetization: Turning Things into Assets in Technoscientific Capitalism. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourdieu, P. (1993) The Field of Cultural Production. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Bradley, D.J. et al. (2004) The IPO quiet period revisited. Journal of Investment Management, 2(3): 1–11.Google Scholar
Bullock, N. and Kuchler, H. (2017) Snap drops 12% to close below Thursday's opening price. Financial Times, 7 March. Available at: <https://www.ft.com/content/a4b645ee-02b2-11e7-aa5b-6bb07f5c8e12>. Accessed 1 June 2018.. Accessed 1 June 2018.' href=https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Bullock,+N.+and+Kuchler,+H.+(2017)+Snap+drops+12%+to+close+below+Thursday's+opening+price.+Financial+Times,+7+March.+Available+at:+.+Accessed+1+June+2018.>Google Scholar
Callon, M. et al. (2002) The economy of qualities. Economy and Society, 31(2): 194–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chemmanur, T.J. and Krishnan, K. (2012) Heterogeneous beliefs, IPO valuation, and the economic role of the underwriter in IPOs. Financial Management, 41(4): 769–811.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chiapello, E. (2015) Financialisation of valuation. Human Studies, 38(1): 13–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Damodaran, A. (2018) The Dark Side of Valuation: Valuing Young, Distressed, and Complex Businesses. Third edition. Indianapolis, IN: Pearson FT Press.Google Scholar
Danermark, B. et al. (2019) Explaining Society: Critical Realism in the Social Sciences. Second edition. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Diaz-Bone, R. (2017) Classifications, quantifications and quality conventions in markets. Historical Social Research, 42(1): 238–62.Google Scholar
Doganova, L. and Muniesa, F. (2015) Capitalization devices: Business models and the renewal of markets. In: Kornberger, M. et al. (eds.) Making Things Valuable. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 109–25.Google Scholar
Edgecliffe-Johnson, A. and Badkar, M. (2019) WeWork to formally withdraw IPO filing. Financial Times, 30 September. Available at: <https://www.ft.com/content/a18aa1a0-e390-11e9-b112-9624ec9edc59>. Accessed 29 April 2020..+Accessed+29+April+2020.>Google Scholar
Elder-Vass, D. (2007) A method for social ontology. Journal of Critical Realism, 6(2): 226–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elder-Vass, D. (2010) The Causal Power of Social Structures. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Favereau, O. (2017) Hommage à François Eymard-Duvernay. Revue Française de Socio-Économie, 18: 5–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feng, H. et al. (2001) A new business model? The capital market and the new economy. Economy and Society, 30(4): 467–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freeman, J. (2005) Venture capital and modern capitalism. In: Nee, V. and Swedberg, R. (eds.) The Economic Sociology of Capitalism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 145–67.Google Scholar
Fuldner, G. (2012) How does an IPO roadshow not violate SEC ‘quiet period’ rules? Available at: <https://www.quora.com/How-does-an-IPO-roadshow-not-violate-SEC-quiet-period-rules>. Accessed 24 May 2018..+Accessed+24+May+2018.>Google Scholar
Gilbert, M. (1990) Walking together. Midwest Studies in Philosophy, XV: 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gompers, P. and Lerner, J. (2006) The Venture Capital Cycle. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Hall, S. (1973) Encoding and decoding in the television discourse. Council of Europe Colloquy on ‘Training In the critical reading of televisual language’. Leicester: Centre for Cultural Studies, University of Birmingham.Google Scholar
Harrington, B. (2008) Pop Finance: Investment Clubs and the New Investor Populism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Hellmann, T. and Puri, M. (2002) Venture capital and the professionalization of start-up firms: Empirical evidence. The Journal of Finance, 57(1): 169–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hook, L. (2015) Unicorns face end of the ‘steroid era’. Financial Times, 10 November. Available at: <https://www.ft.com/content/6ad992e6-8792-11e5-9f8c-a8d619fa707c>. Accessed 23 May 2018..+Accessed+23+May+2018.>Google Scholar
Hook, L. (2016) Investors’ need for start-up knowledge spurs new breed of analyst. Financial Times, 6 September. Available at: <https://www.ft.com/content/61de9980-7093-11e6-9ac1-1055824ca907>. Accessed 23 May 2018..+Accessed+23+May+2018.>Google Scholar
Hook, L. (2017) Airbnb completes $1bn fundraising to support expansion. Financial Times, 9 March. Available at: <https://www.ft.com/content/0fde09e0-04ef-11e7-ace0-1ce02ef0def9>. Accessed 04 June 2018..+Accessed+04+June+2018.>Google Scholar
Hornby, C. (2007) German household investors hug sidelines. Reuters, 1 August. Available at: <https://uk.reuters.com/article/lifestyle-germany-stocks-risk-dc-idUKL1978588820070801>. Accessed 26 August 2020..+Accessed+26+August+2020.>Google Scholar
Kenney, M. and Zysman, J. (2019) Unicorns, Cheshire cats, and the new dilemmas of entrepreneurial finance. Venture Capital, 21(1): 35–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuchler, H. (2017) Snap downgraded by lead IPO underwriter as shares fall. Financial Times, 11 July. Available at: <https://www.ft.com/content/a10f4b28-663c-11e7-9a66-93fb352ba1fe>. Accessed 24 May 2018..+Accessed+24+May+2018.>Google Scholar
Kuchler, H. and Bullock, N. (2017) Snapchat owner closes up 44% for $28.3bn valuation. Financial Times, 2 March. Available at: <https://www.ft.com/content/89f1a01a-ff55-11e6-96f8-3700c5664d30>. Accessed 21 May 2018..+Accessed+21+May+2018.>Google Scholar
Langley, P. and Leyshon, A. (2017) Platform capitalism: The intermediation and capitalization of digital economic circulation. Finance and Society, 3(1): 11–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, M. (2011) The Big Short: Inside the Doomsday Machine. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Lex (2017a) Snap: Evanescent analysts. Financial Times, 31 March. Available at: <https://www.ft.com/content/56f1620e-1332-11e7-b0c1-37e417ee6c76>. Accessed 01 June 2018..+Accessed+01+June+2018.>Google Scholar
Lex (2017b) Snap: hangdog billionaire. Financial Times, 10 August. Available at: <https://www.ft.com/content/8c1dd068-7e1f-11e7-ab01-a13271d1ee9c>. Accessed 24 May 2018..+Accessed+24+May+2018.>Google Scholar
Liu, X. and Ritter, J. R. (2011) Local underwriter oligopolies and IPO underpricing. Journal of Financial Economics, 102(3): 579–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacKenzie, D. (2009) Material Markets: How Economic Agents Are Constructed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Megginson, W.L. and Weiss, K.A. (1991) Venture capitalist certification in initial public offerings. The Journal of Finance, 46(3): 879–903.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Metrick, A. and Yasuda, A. (2010) Venture Capital and the Finance of Innovation. Second revised edition. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Morgan, J. (2008) Private Equity Finance: Rise and Repercussions. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Muniesa, F. et al. (2017) Capitalization: A Cultural Guide. Paris: Presses des Mines.Google Scholar
Orléan, A. (2014) The Empire of Value: A New Foundation for Economics. translated by Debevoise, M.B. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ouma, S. (2018) This can(‘t) be an asset class: The world of money management, “society”, and the contested morality of farmland investments: Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 52(1): 66–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Platt, E. and Fontanella-Khan, J. (2019) WeWork postpones IPO after chilly response from investors. Financial Times, 16 September. Available at: <https://www.ft.com/content/b869bc42-d8d9-11e9-8f9b-77216ebe1f17>. Accessed 29 April 2020..+Accessed+29+April+2020.>Google Scholar
Ritter, J.R. (2011) Equilibrium in the IPO market. [SSRN Scholarly Paper] Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network. Available at: <http://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=1822542>. Accessed 1 September 2016.CrossRef.+Accessed+1+September+2016.>Google Scholar
Sahlman, W.A. (1990) The structure and governance of venture-capital organizations. Journal of Financial Economics, 27(2): 473–521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simon, H. (1972) Theories of bounded rationality. In: McGuire, C.B. and Radner, R. (eds.) Decision and Organization. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishing, 161–76.Google Scholar
Singer, D. (2018) Anniversary of Snap IPO to trigger final lockup expiration. Bloomberg, 1 March. Available at: <https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-03-01/anniversary-of-snap-ipo-to-trigger-final-lockup-expiration>. Accessed 1 June 2018..+Accessed+1+June+2018.>Google Scholar
Snap Inc. (2017) Snap Inc. S-1 Registration Statement. Washington, DC: US Securities and Exchange Commission. Available at: <https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1564408/000119312517029199/d270216ds1.htm>. Accessed 21 May 2018..+Accessed+21+May+2018.>Google Scholar
Srnicek, N. (2016) Platform Capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Stross, R. (2000) EBoys: The First Inside Account of Venture Capitalists at Work. New York: Crown Publications.Google Scholar
Thrift, N. (2001) ‘It's the romance, not the finance, that makes the business worth pursuing’: Disclosing a new market culture. Economy and Society, 30(4): 412–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waters, R. (2017) Uber crafts share sale plan to prop up valuation. Financial Times, 16 August. Available at: <https://www.ft.com/content/51d97262-82da-11e7-94e2-c5b903247afd>. Accessed 04 June 2018..+Accessed+04+June+2018.>Google Scholar
Williams, J.W. (2020) Recidivists, rough sleepers, and the unemployed as financial assets: Social impact bonds and the creation of new markets in social services. In: Birch, K. and Muniesa, F. (eds.) Assetization: Turning Things into Assets in Technoscientific Capitalism. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 287–312.Google Scholar
Yenkey, C. (2010) Selling value in Nairobi's stock exchange. In: Beckert, J. and Aspers, P. (eds.) The Worth of Goods: Valuation and Pricing in the Economy. New York: Oxford University Press, 247–71.Google Scholar
Zook, M. (2005) The Geography of the Internet Industry: Venture Capital, Dot-coms, and Local Knowledge. Malden, MA: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zuckerman, E.W. (1999) The categorical imperative: Securities analysts and the illegitimacy discount. American Journal of Sociology, 104(5): 1398–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar