Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T01:13:21.229Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Stratigraphical Range of the Foraminiferal Genus Orbulina D'Orbigny 1839

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

R. N. C. Bowen
R. N. C. Bowen
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, University College, Exeter
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This genus is not present in pre-Oligocene rocks and probably does not occur below the basal Miocene. Stratigraphical and micropalaeontological evidence is produced to support this statement.

Type
Articles
Information
Geological Magazine , Volume 92 , Issue 2 , April 1955 , pp. 162 - 167
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1955

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Beck, R. Stanley, 1943. Eocene foraminifera from Cowlitz River, Lewis County, Washington. Journ. Pal., xvii, 609.Google Scholar
Bowen, R. N. C., 1954. Foraminifera from the London Clay, Proc. Geol. Assoc., lxv, 141.Google Scholar
Brady, H. B., 1884. Report on the scientific results of the voyage of H.M.S. “Challenger” 1873–76. ix, pp. 606–612.Google Scholar
Bronnimann, P., 1951. The genus Orbulina d' Orbigny in the Oligo-Miocene of Trinidad, B.W.I. Cont. Cush. Found. For. Res., ii, 131–8.Google Scholar
Coryell, H. N., and Mossman, R. W., 1942. Foraminifera from Charco Azul formation, Pliocene, of Panama. Journ. Pal., xvi, 239.Google Scholar
Cushman, J. A., 1948. Foraminifera, their classification and economic use. Harvard University Press, p. 326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eames, F. E., 1953. The Miocene/Oligocene boundary and the use of the term Aquitanian. Geol. Mag., xc, 388–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eames, F. E., 1954. The Caribbean “Oligocene”, Geol. Mag., xci, 326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glaessner, M. F., 1945. Principles of micropalaeontology, Melbourne University Press, p. 149.Google Scholar
Gregorio, A. de, 1930. Sue Permiano di Sicilia. Ann. Geol Pal., Palerme, lii, 49.Google Scholar
Jedlitschka, H., 1934. Über Candorbulina, eine neue Foraminiferen-Gattung, und zwei neue Candeina-Arlen: Naturforsch. Ver. Brünn, Verh., lxv, 20.Google Scholar
Kugler, H. G., 1953. Jur. to Rec. Sed. Environments in Trinidad, Bull. Ass. Suisse Geol. et Ing. Petrole, xx, 27–60.Google Scholar
Leroy, L. W., 1948. The foraminifer Orbulina universa d' Orbigny, a suggested middle Tertiary time indicator. Journ. Pal., xxii, 500–8.Google Scholar
Leroy, L. W., 1952. Orbulina universa d' Orbigny in Central Sumatra. Journ. Pal., xxvi, 565–584.Google Scholar
Matthew, G. F., 1895. The Protolenus fauna. New York Acad. Sci., Trans., xiv, 110.Google Scholar
Orbigny, A.d', 1839. Foraminifères. In Ramon de la Sagra, Histoire physique et naturelle de l'lle de Cuba. A. Bertrand, Paris, p. 2.Google Scholar
Orbigny, A.d', 1846. Foraminifères fossiles du bassin tertiare de Vienne (Autriche). Paris, Gide et Comp., pp. 22–3, Pl. 1, Fig. 1.Google Scholar
Sherborn, C. D., and Chapman, F., 1886. On some Microzoa from the London Clay exposed in the drainage works, Piccadilly, London. Journ. Roy. Microsc. Sci., 2, xi, 756.Google Scholar
Williams-Mitchell, E., 1948. The zonal value of foraminifera in the Chalk of England. Proc. Geol. Assoc., lix, 100.Google Scholar
Zalessky, M. D., 1926. Premieres observations microscopiques sur le schiste bitumineux du Volgien inferieur. Soc. Geol. Nord. Ann., li, 87.Google Scholar