Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T02:03:55.852Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Graptolitic Faunas of the Gotlandian in the Eastern Alps and their Relationships

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

Franz Heritsch
Franz Heritsch
Affiliation:
(Graz)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The years that followed the Great War saw a rapid development in knowledge of the graptolitic faunas of the Eastern Alps. Professor M. Gortani described many graptolites from the Carnic Alps, and papers from the Geological Department of the University of Graz dealt with the same subject, as well as the distribution of the graptolites over a wider area of the Eastern Alps. Especially noteworthy was the surprising discovery of graptolites in the so-called grauwacke zone of the Alps, which follows the southern margin of the Northern Calcareous Alps. In the grauwacke zone, which consists of Palaeozoic and more ancient strata, more or less metamorphosed, graptolites were found at the following localities, (a) Fieberbrunn in the Tyrol (1), where the zones of Monograptus cyphus to M. turriculatus are found, and the presence of M. priodon indicates that higher zones may occur; (b) environs of Eisenerz in Styria (2), where the zones of M. gregarius to M. griestoniensis are found, as well as the zone of M. nilssoni; (c) Montavon in Vorarl-berg (29), where a badly-preserved specimen of Monograptus, possibly M. priodon, was discovered.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Geological Magazine , Volume 71 , Issue 6 , June 1934 , pp. 268 - 275
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1934

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

(1) Aigner, G. “Silurisehe Versteinerungen aus der Grauwackenzone von Fieberbrunn in Tirol,” Verh. Geol. Bundesanstalt, Wien, 1930, 222–4.Google Scholar
Aigner, G. “Eine Graptolithenfauna aus der Grauwackenzone von Fieberbrunn in Tirol nebst Bemerkungen über die Grauwackenzone von Dienten,” Sitzungsb. Akad. Wissensch., Wien, Abt. i, 1931, cxl, 23–55.Google Scholar
(2) Heritsch, F. “Graptolithen aus dem Sauerbrunngraben bei Eisenerz,” Verh. Geol. Bundesanstalt, Wien, 1931, 230–5.Google Scholar
Haberfelner, E. und Heritsch, F. “Graptolithen aus dem Weiritz-graben bei Eisenerz,” Verh. Geol. Bundesanstalt, 1932, 81–9.Google Scholar
(3) Heritsch, F. “Graptolithenfund bei Mixnitz,” Verh. Geol. Bundesanstalt, 1931, 206.Google Scholar
(4) Heritsch, F. und Thurner, A. “Graptolithenfunde in der Murauer Kalk-Phyllitserie,” Verh. Geol. Bundesanstalt, 1932, 92–3.Google Scholar
(5) Stache, G. “Die Entdeekung von Graptolithen-Schiefern in den Südalpen,” Verh. Geol. Bundesanstalt, 1872, 234–40.Google Scholar
(6) Gortani, M. “Contribuzione alio studio del Paleozoico carnico, VI, Faune a graptoliti,” Palaeontographia italica, xxvi, 1920, 1–56.Google Scholar
Gortani, M. “Contribuzione alio studio del Paleozoico carnico, VII, Graptoliti del Monte Hochwipfel,” Palaeontographia italica, xxix, 1923, 1–24.Google Scholar
Gortani, M. “La seria graptolitica delle Alpi Carniehe,” Rendic. Accad. Sci., Bologna, 2, xxix, 1925, 1–6.Google Scholar
Gortani, M. “Graptoliti del piano di Wenlock nelle Alpi Carniehe,” Giorn. Geol., 2, i, 1926, 16–19.Google Scholar
(7) Haberfelner, E. “Graptolithen aus dem Obersilur der Karnischen Alpen, I, Hochwipfel-Nordseite,” Sitzungsb. Akad. Wissensch., Wien, Abt. i, cxl, 1931, 89–168.Google Scholar
Haberfelner, E. “Graptolithen aus dem Obersilur der Karnischen Alpen II, Unter-llandovervlydite voni Polinig und der Waidegger Höhe,” Sitzungsb. Akad. Wissensch., Wien, Abt. i, cxl, 1931, 879Google Scholar
(8) Bouček, F. “Communication préliminaire sur quelques nouvelles espèces de Graptolites provenant du Gothlandien de la Bohême,” Vestnik Statniho geol. Ustavu, Č. Sl. R., vii, 1931, 293–306.Google Scholar
(9) Bouček, F. “Sur la présence dela zone à Cyrtograptus rigidus. Tullb. et d’autres zones dans le Gothlandien de la Bohême,” Vestnik Statniho geol. Ustavu, Č. Sl. R., vii, 1931, 85–98.Google Scholar
(10) Bouček, F. “O stratigrafickych pomerech pasma ea ‘kolonie Lapworth’, u Zdic,” Časopis Narodniho Musea, 1930, 1.Google Scholar
(11) Allahverdjiew, D. “Contribution à l’étude du système silurien en Bulgarie,” Bull. Soc. gé;ol. France, 4, viii, 1908–1910, 330–341.Google Scholar
Boncev, E. “Graptolites from the defile of the Iskar(Bulgaria),” Review Bulgar. geol. Soc., iii, pt. 3, 1931, 53–64.Google Scholar
Haberfelner, E. “Ueber das Silur im Balkan nördlich von Sofia,” Mitt. Naturwiss. Ver. Steiermark, lxvi, 1929, 104–149.Google Scholar
(12) Gortani, M. ”Faune paleozoiche della Sardegna. I. Le Graptoliti di Goni. II. Graptoliti della Sardegna Orientale,” Palaeontographia italica, xxviii, 1922, 41–67, 85–111.Google Scholar
(13) Haberfelner, E. “Eine Revision der Graptolithen der Sierra Morena(Spanien),” Abh. Senckenberg. Naliirforsch. Gesellsch. Frankfurt a.M., xliii, pt. ii, 1931, 31.Google Scholar
(14) Lotze, F. “Stratigraphie und Tektonik des Keltiberischen Grund-gebirges,” Abh. Gesellsch. Wissensch. Gōttingen, Math. Nat. Kl., N.F., xiv, 2, 1929, 92.Google Scholar
(15) Kegel, W. “Das Gotlandium in den kantabrischen Ketten Nord-spaniens,” Zeitschr. Deutsch. Geol. Gesellsch., Ixxxi, 1929, 35–62.Google Scholar
(16) Schriel, W. “Der geologische Bau des katalonischen Küstengebirges zwischen Ebromündung und Ampurdan,” Abh. Gesellsch. Wissensch. Göttingen, xiv, 1, 1929, 18.Google Scholar
(17) Haberfelner, E. “Zur Entwicklungsgeschichte der Monograptiden,” Anzeiger Akad. Wissensch., Wien, Math. Nat. Kl., 1932, 134–6.Google Scholar
(18) Marr, J. E. “Conditions of Deposition of the Stockdale Shales of the Lake District,” Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., lxxxi, 1925, 123.Google Scholar
(19) Gentil, L. “Observations géologiques dans le Sud-Marocain,” Bull. Soc. géol. France, 4, v, 1905, 521–3.Google Scholar
(20) Russo, P. “Etat actual des connaissances sur les terrains paléozoiques du Maroc,” Comptes Rendus XIIIe Session Congrès géol. intern. (Belgium), ii, 1925, 1005–1037.Google Scholar
(21) Blanckenhorn, M. “Syrien, Arabien und Mesopotamien,” Handbuch der regionalen Geologie, Heidelberg, v, pt. iv, 1914.Google Scholar
Dienemann, W. “Aelteres Palaozoikum von Südsyrien und West-arabien,” Centr. f. Min. Geol. u. Pal., 1915, 23–6.Google Scholar
(22) Frech, F. “Geologie Kleinasiens im Bereich der Bagbadbahn,” Zeilschr. Deutsch. Geol. Gesellsch., 1916, 1–325.Google Scholar
(23) Desio, A. “Sulla presenza del siluriano fossilifero nell’isola di Coo (Egeo),” Rendic. R. Accad. Lincei, 6, xi, 1930, 1020–1.Google Scholar
(24) Guerassimov, A., and Janischewski, M. “Sur les depôts du Silurien supérieur dans les environs de Kislovodsk,” Bull. Coin. géol. Leningrad., xxxv, 1916, 627–638.Google Scholar
Yanishewsky, M. “On some representatives of the upper Silurian fauna of the Caucasus,” Annuaire Soc. paléont. Russie, ii, 1918, 47–64.Google Scholar
(25) Librovitch, L. S. “To the discovery of a graptolitic facies of Upper Silurian in South Ural,” Bull. Geol. Serv. U.S.S.R., xlix, 1930, 103–118.Google Scholar
Avekianow, B. “Graptoloidea from the river Kuragan (Western slope of South Ural),” Bull. Geol. Serv. U.S.S.R., 1, 1931, 129–134.Google Scholar
(26) Averianow, B. “Graptoloidea der obersilurischen Schiefer aus Ost-Turkestan,” Bull. Geol. Serv. U.S.S.R., xlviii, 1929, 691.Google Scholar
(27) Laverdière, J. W. “Contribution à l’étude des terrains paléozoiques dans les Pyrénées Oceidentales,” Mém. Soc. géol. Nord., x, Mém. 2, 1930, 63–72.Google Scholar
(28) Delgado, N. J. F. “Système silurique du Portugal. Étude de strati-graphie paléontologique,” Comrn. Serv. géol. Portugal, 1908, 119, 218, 219.Google Scholar
(29) Peltzmann, Ida. “Silurnachweis durch einen Graptolithenfund in der Grauwackenzone Vorarlbergs,” Verh. Geol. Bundesanstalt, Wien, 1933, 160.Google Scholar