Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T05:49:44.010Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Late Visean – early Serpukhovian conodont succession at the Naqing (Nashui) section in Guizhou, South China

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 October 2013

YUPING QI ,
TAMARA I. NEMYROVSKA ,
XIANGDONG WANG ,
JITAO CHEN ,
ZHIHAO WANG ,
H. RICHARD LANE ,
BARRY C. RICHARDS ,
KEYI HU  and
QIULAI WANG
YUPING QI*
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of Palaeobiology and Stratigraphy, Nanjing Institute of Geology and Palaeontology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 39 East Beijing Road, Nanjing, 210008, China
TAMARA I. NEMYROVSKA
Affiliation:
Institute of Geological Sciences, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, 55-b O. Gonchar Str., 01601, Kiev, Ukraine
XIANGDONG WANG
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of Palaeobiology and Stratigraphy, Nanjing Institute of Geology and Palaeontology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 39 East Beijing Road, Nanjing, 210008, China
JITAO CHEN
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of Palaeobiology and Stratigraphy, Nanjing Institute of Geology and Palaeontology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 39 East Beijing Road, Nanjing, 210008, China
ZHIHAO WANG
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of Palaeobiology and Stratigraphy, Nanjing Institute of Geology and Palaeontology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 39 East Beijing Road, Nanjing, 210008, China
H. RICHARD LANE
Affiliation:
National Science Foundation of USA, 4201 Wilson Blvd., Arlington, VA, 22230, USA
BARRY C. RICHARDS
Affiliation:
Geological Survey of Canada, 3303–33rd Street, NW, Calgary AB, T2L 2A7, Canada
KEYI HU
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of Palaeobiology and Stratigraphy, Nanjing Institute of Geology and Palaeontology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 39 East Beijing Road, Nanjing, 210008, China
QIULAI WANG
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of Palaeobiology and Stratigraphy, Nanjing Institute of Geology and Palaeontology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 39 East Beijing Road, Nanjing, 210008, China
*
†Author for correspondence: ypqi@nigpas.ac.cn
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study reports the conodont succession across the Visean–Serpukhovian (V/S) boundary interval at the Naqing section, South China. Continuous centimetre-scale sampling of the relatively deep-water section in recent years has provided new data for a more detailed biostratigraphy of conodonts across the Visean–Serpukhovian boundary. Three conodont zones were described in ascending order: the Gnathodus bilineatus, Lochriea nodosa and Lochriea ziegleri zones. The first appearance datum (FAD) of L. ziegleri has been moved down to 60.1 m above the base of the Naqing section. The correlation of the conodont succession across the Visean–Serpukhovian boundary in the Naqing section with other sections in Eurasia is discussed.

Keywords

conodont successionVisean–Serpukhovian boundarycandidate GSSPNaqing sectionSouth China
Type
Original Articles
Information
Geological Magazine , Volume 151 , Issue 2 , March 2014 , pp. 254 - 268
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adrichem-Boogaert, H. A. van. 1967. Devonian and lower Carboniferous conodonts of the Cantabrian Mountains (Spain) and their stratigraphic application. Leidse Geologische Mededelingen 39, 129–92.Google Scholar
Alekseev, A. S., Goreva, N. V., Isakova, T. N. & Makhlina, M. Kh. 2004. Biostratigraphy of the Carboniferous in the Moscow Syneclise, Russia. Newsletter on Carboniferous Stratigraphy 22, 28–35.Google Scholar
Austin, R. L. & Husri, S. 1974. Dinantian conodont faunas of County Clare, County Limerick and County Leitrim. In International Symposium on Belgian Micropaleontological Limits from Emsian to Visean, Namur, 3 (eds Bouckaert, J. & Streel, M.), pp. 18–69. Geological Survey of Belgium, Brussels.Google Scholar
Barskov, I. S., Alekseev, A. S., Goreva, N. V., Kononova, L. I. & Migdisova, A. V. 1984. Zonal’naya shkala karbona Vostochno-Yevropeiskoi platformy po konodontam (Carboniferous conodont zonation of the East-European Platform). In Paleontologicheskaya kharakteristika stratotipi-cheskikh i opornykh razrezov karbona Moskovskoi sineklizy (Palaeontological Characteristics of the Carboniferous Stratotypes and Key Sections of the Moscow Syneclize) (ed Menner, V. V.), pp. 143–7. Moscow State University Press, Moscow (in Russian).Google Scholar
Belka, Z. 1985. Lower Carboniferous conodont biostratigraphy in the northern part of the Moravia-Silesia Basin. Acta Geologica Polonica 35, 1–60.Google Scholar
Belka, Z. & Lehmann, J. 1998. Late Visean/early Namurian conodont succession from the Esla area of the Cantabrian Mountains. Acta Geologica Polonica 48, 31–41.Google Scholar
Bischoff, G. 1957. Die Conodonten-Stratigraphie des rheno-herzynischen Unterkarbons mit Berücksichtigung der Wocklumeria-Stufe und der Karbon/Devon-Grenze. Abhandlungen des Hessischen Landesamtes für Bodenforschung 19, 1–64.Google Scholar
Blanco-Ferrera, S., Sanz-Lopez, J., Garcia-Lopez, S. & Bastida, F. 2009. Visean to Serpukhovian (Carboniferous) occurrences of Lochriea species at the Vegas de Sotres section (Cantabrian Mountains, Spain). Permophiles 53, 9–10.Google Scholar
Boersma, K. T. 1973. Devonian and Lower Carboniferous conodont biostratigraphy, central Spanish Pyrenees. Leidse Geologische Mededelingen 49, 303–77.Google Scholar
Boogaard, M. van den. 1992. The reccurrence of Vogelgnathus campbelli-dominated faunas in the Visean and early Namurian of the Cantabrian Mts (Spain): a reflection of sea-level fluctuations. Scripta Geologica 99, 1–33.Google Scholar
Branson, E. B. & Mehl, M. G. 1938. Stratigraphy and paleontology of the Lower Mississippian of Missouri, part II. University of Missouri Studies 13, 128–206.Google Scholar
Branson, E. B. & Mehl, M. G. 1941. New and little known Carboniferous conodont genera. Journal of Paleontology 15, 97–106.Google Scholar
Buchroithner, M. F. von. 1979. Die Conodonten-Chronologie im Karbon der Pyrenaën. Mitteilungen der Österreichischen Geologischen Geselschaft 70, 75–118.Google Scholar
Burchette, T. P. & Wright, V. P. 1992. Carbonate ramp depositional systems. Sedimentary Geology 79, 3–57.Google Scholar
Chen, J., Chough, S. K., Lee, J.-H. & Han, Z. 2012. Sequence-stratigraphic comparison of the upper Cambrian Series 3 to Furongian succession between the Shandong region, China and the Taebaek area, Korea: high variability of bounding surfaces in an epeiric platform. Geosciences Journal 16, 357–79.Google Scholar
Clarke, W. J. 1960. Scottish Carboniferous conodonts. Transactions of the Edinburgh Geological Society 18, 1–31.Google Scholar
Dunn, D. L. 1965. Late Mississipian conodonts from the Bird Spring Formation in Nevada. Journal of Paleontology 39, 1145–50.Google Scholar
Gibshman, N. B. 2001. Foraminiferal biostratigraphy of the Serpukhovian Stage stratotype (Zaborie guarry, Moscow Basin). Newsletter on Carboniferous Stratigraphy 19, 31–4.Google Scholar
Groessens, E. 1975. Preliminary range chart of conodont biozonation in the Belgian Dinantian. In International Symposium on Belgian Micropaleontological Limits from Emsian to Visean, Namur, 1974 (eds Bouckaert, J. & Streel, M.), pp. 1–193. Geological Survey of Belgium, Brussels, Pub no. 17.Google Scholar
Groves, J. R. 2010. Foraminifers from the Visean-Serpukhovian and Bashkirian-Moscovian boundaries at the Nashui section, Guizhou Province, South China. In Carboniferous Carbonate Succession from Shallow Marine to Slope in Southern Guizhou. Field Excursion Guidebook for the SCCS Workshop on GSSPs of the Carboniferous System (eds Wang, X. D., Qi, Y. P., Groves, J. R., Barrick, J. E., Nemirovskaya, T. I., Ueno, K. & Wang, Y.), pp. 108–17. Nanjing Institute of Geology and Palaeontology (Chinese Academy of Sciences), Nanjing.Google Scholar
Hass, W. H. 1953. Conodonts of the Barnett Formation of Texas. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 243-F, 69–94.Google Scholar
Higgins, A. C. 1961. Some Namurian conodonts from North Staffordshire. Geological Magazine 98(3), 210–25.Google Scholar
Higgins, A. C. 1975. Conodont zonation of the late Visean-early Westphalian strata of the south and central Pennines of northern England. Bulletin of Geological Survey of Great Britain 53, 1–90.Google Scholar
Higgins, A. C. 1985. The Carboniferous System. Part 2: Conodonts of the Silesian Subsystem from Great Britain and Ireland. In A Stratigraphical Index of Conodonts (eds Higgins, A. C. & Austin, R. L.), pp. 210–27. British Micropalaeontological Society Series.Google Scholar
Higgins, A. C. & Bouckaert, J. 1968. Conodont stratigraphy and palaeontology of the Namurian of Belgium. Mémoire Explicative des Cartes Géologiques et 672 Minières de la Belgique 10, 1–64.Google Scholar
Higgins, A. C. & Wagner-Gentis, C. H. T. 1982. Conodonts, goniatites and biostratigraphy of the earlier Carboniferous from the Cantabrian Mountains, Spain. Palaeontology 25, 313–50.Google Scholar
Hinde, G. J. 1900. Notes and descriptions of new species of Scotch Carboniferous conodonts. Transactions of the Natural History Society of Glasgow 5, 338–46.Google Scholar
Kabanov, P. B., Aleksev, A. S., Gabdullin, R. R., Gibshman, N. B., Bershov, A., Naumov, S. & Samarin, E. 2013. Progress in sequence stratigraphy of Upper Visean and Lower Serpukhovian of southern Moscow Basin, Russia. Newsletter on Carboniferous Stratigraphy 30, 55–65.Google Scholar
Krumhardt, A. P., Harris, A. & Watts, K. F. 1996. Lithostratigraphy, microlithofacies, and conodont bio-stratigraphy and biofacies of the Wahoo Limestone (Carboniferous), eastern Sadlerochit Mountains, northeast Brook Range, Alaska. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 1568, 1–170.Google Scholar
Kulagina, E. I., Rumyantseva, Z. S., Pazukhin, V. N. & Kotchetkova, N. M. 1992. Granitsa nizhnego-srednego karbona na Yuzhnom Urale i Srednem Tyanshane (Lower/Middle Carboniferous Boundary at South Urals and Middle Tienshan). Nauka, Moskva, 112 pp (in Russian).Google Scholar
Lane, H. R. & Brenckle, P. L. 2001. Type Mississippian subdivision and biostratigraphic succession. In Stratigraphy and Biostratigraphy of the Mississippian Subsystem (Carboniferous Subsystem) in its Type Region, the Mississippian River Valley of Illinois, Missouri and Iowa (ed Heckel, P. H.), pp. 83–95. IUGS Subcommission on Carboniferous Stratigraphy, Guidebook for Field Conference, Sept. 8–13, 2001.Google Scholar
Lane, H. R., Sandberg, C. A. & Ziegler, W. 1980. Taxonomy and phylogeny of some Lower Carboniferous conodonts and preliminary standard post-Siphonodella zonation. Geologica et Palaeontologica 14, 117–64.Google Scholar
Lane, H. R. & Straka, J. J. 1974. Late Mississippian and Early Pennsylvanian conodonts, Arkansas and Oklahoma. Geological Society of America, Special Paper 152, 1–144.Google Scholar
Makhlina, M. Kh., Vdovenko, M. V., Alekseev, A. S., Byvsheva, T. V., Donakova, L. M., Zhulitova, V. E., Kononova, L. I., Umnova, N. I. & Shik, E. M. 1993. Lower Carboniferous of the Moscow Syneclise and the Voronezh Anteclise. Nauka, Moscow, 221 pp. (in Russian).Google Scholar
Meischner, D. 1970. Conodonten-Chronologie des Deutschen Karbons. In 6th International Conference on Carboniferous Stratigraphy and Geology, Sheffield, 1967, 3, 1169–80.Google Scholar
Meischner, D. & Nemyrovska, T. 1999. Origin of Gnathodus bilineatus (Roundy, 1926) related to goniatite zonation in Rhenisches Schiefergebirge, Germany. Bolletino della Società Paleontologica Italiana 37, 427–42.Google Scholar
Menéndez-Álvaréz, J. R. 1978. Conodontos de la Formación Genicera en el corte de Entrago (Teverga, Asturias). Breviora Geológica Asturica 22(1–2), 1–16.Google Scholar
Miall, A. D. 2005. Testing for eustatic sea-level control in the Precambrian sedimentary record. Sedimentary Geology 176, 9–16.Google Scholar
Nemirovskaya, T. I. 1983. Konodonty serpukhovskikh I nizhnebashkirskikh otlozhenij Dnieprovsko-Donetskoj vpadiny (Serpukhovian and early Bashkirian conodonts of the Dnieper-Donets Depression). Izvestiya Akademii Nauk SSSR, Seriya Geologicheskaya, 11, 59–69 (in Russian).Google Scholar
Nemirovskaya, T. I. 1985. Pozdnevizeiskie-rannieserpukhovskie konodonty Dnieprovsko-Donetskoj vpadiny (Late Viséan-Early Serpukhovian conodonts of the Dnieper-Donets Depression). In Iskopaemye Organizmy I Stratigrafiya Osadochnogo Chekhla UkrSSR (Fossils and Stratigraphy of the Sedimentary Cover of the UkrSSR) (ed Vyalov, O. S.), pp. 48–51. Naukova Dumka, Kiev (in Russian).Google Scholar
Nemirovskaya, T. I., Perret-Mirouse, M.-F. & Meischner, D. 1994. Lochriea ziegleri and Lochriea senckenbergica: new conodont species from the latest Visean and Serpukhovian in Europe. Courier Forschungsinstitut Senckenberg 168, 311–7.Google Scholar
Nemyrovska, T. I. 1999. Bashkirian conodonts of the Donets Basin. Scripta Geologica 119, 1–115.Google Scholar
Nemyrovska, T. I. 2005. Late Visean/early Serpukhovian conodont succession from the Triollo section, Palencia (Cantabrian Mountains, Spain). Scripta Geologica 129, 13–89.Google Scholar
Nemyrovska, T. I., Perret-Mirouse, M.-F. & Weyant, M. 2006. The early Visean (Carboniferous) conodonts from the Saoura Valley, Algeria. Acta Geologica Polonica 56(3), 361–70.Google Scholar
Nemyrovska, T. I., Wagner, R. H., Winkler Prins, C. F. & Montanez, I. 2011. Conodont faunas across the mid-Carboniferous boundary from the Barcaliente Formation at La Lastra (Palentian Zone, Cantabrian Mountains, northwest Spain); geological setting, sedimentological characters and faunal descriptions. Scripta Geologica 143, 127–83.Google Scholar
Nigmadganov, I. M., Nikolaeva, S. V., Konovalova, V. A. & Orlov-Labkovsky, O. 2010. Integrated ammonoid, conodont and foraminiferal stratigraphy in the Paltau Section, Middle Tienshan, Uzbekistan. Newsletter on Carboniferous Stratigraphy 28, 50–60.Google Scholar
Nikitin, S. N. 1890. Carboniferous deposits of the Moscow region and artesian waters in the vicinity of Moscow. Transactions Geological Committee 5, 1–182.Google Scholar
Nikolaeva, S. V., Gibshman, N. B., Kulagina, E. I., Barskov, I. S. & Pazukhin, V. N. 2002. Correlation of the Visean-Serpukhovian boundary in its type region (Moscow Basin) and the South Urals and a proposal of boundary markers (ammonoids, foraminifers, conodonts). Newsletter on Carboniferous Stratigraphy 20, 16–21.Google Scholar
Nikolaeva, S. V., Kulagina, E. I., Pazukhin, V. N., Kochetova, N. N. & Konovalova, V. A. 2009. Paleontology and microfacies of the Serpukhovian in the Verkhnyaya Kaidailovka section, South Urals, Russia: potential candidate for the GSSP for the Visean-Serpukhovian boundary. Newsletters on Stratigraphy 43(2), 165–93.Google Scholar
Nikolaeva, S. V., Kulagina, E. I., Pazukhin, V. N., Kucheva, N. A., Stepanova, T. I., Kochetova, N. N., Gibshman, N. B., Amon, E. O., Konovalova, V. A. & Zainakaeva, G. F. 2005. Advances in understanding of the Visean-Serpukhovian boundary in the South Urals and its correlation. Newsletter on Carboniferous Stratigraphy 23, 27–30.Google Scholar
Paproth, E., Conil, R., Bless, M. J. M., Boonen, P., Carpentier, N., Coen, M., Delcambre, B., Deprijck, C. H., Deuzon, S., Dreesen, R., Groessens, E., Hance, L., Hennebert, M., Hibo, D., Hahn, G. R., Hislaire, O., Kasig, W., Laloux, M., Lauwers, A., Lees, A., Lys, M., De Beek, O.P., Overlau, P., Pirlet, H., Poty, E., Ramsbottom, W., Streel, M., Swennen, R., Thorez, J., Vanguestaine, M., Van Steenwinkel, M. & Vieslet, J. L. 1983. Bio- and lithostratigraphic subdivisions of the Dinantian in Belgium, a review. Annales de la Societe Geologique de Belgique 106, 185–283.Google Scholar
Pazukhin, V. N., Kulagina, E. I., Nikolaeva, S. V., Kochetova, N. N. & Konovalova, V. A. 2010. The Serpukhovian Stage in the Verkhnyaya Kardailovka Section, South Urals. Stratigraphy and Geological Correlation 18, 269–89.Google Scholar
Perret, M. F. 1993. Recherches micropaléontologiques et biostratigraphiques (Conodontes-Foraminifères) dans le Carbonifère Pyrénéen. Strata 21, 1–597.Google Scholar
Qi, Y. P. & Wang, Z. H. 2005. Serpukhovian conodont sequence and the Visean-Serpukhovian boundary in South China. Rivista Italiana di Paleontologia e Stratigrafia 111(1), 3–10.Google Scholar
Qi, Y. P., Wang, X. D., Richards, B. C., Groves, J. R., Ueno, K., Wang, Z. H., Wu, X. H. & Hu, K. Y. 2010 a. Recent progress on conodonts and foraminifers from the candidate GSSP of the Carboniferous Visean-Serpukhovian boundary in the Naqing (Nashui) section of south China. In Carboniferous Carbonate Succession from Shallow Marine to Slope in Southern Guizhou. Field Excursion Guidebook for the SCCS Workshop on GSSPs of the Carboniferous System (eds Wang, X. D., Qi, Y. P., Groves, J. R., Barrick, J. E., Nemirovskaya, T. I., Ueno, K. & Wang, Y.), pp. 35–64. Nanjing Institute of Geology and Palaeontology (Chinese Academy of Sciences).Google Scholar
Qi, Y. P., Wang, X. D., Richards, B. C., Groves, J. R., Ueno, K. & Wu, X. H. 2010 b. Recent study of conodonts and foraminifers from the candidate GSSP of the Carboniferous Visean-Serpukhovian boundary in the Naqing (Nashui) section of South China. In 3rd International Palaeontological Congress, London, 2010, June 28–July 3, Programme and Abstracts, p. 322.Google Scholar
Qi, Y. P., Wang, X. D., Wang, Z. H., Lane, H. R., Richards, B. C., Katsumi, U. & Groves, J. R. 2009. Conodont biostratigraphy of the Naqing (Nashui) section in South China: candidate GSSPs for both the Serpukhovian and Moscovian Stages. Permophiles 53, 39–40.Google Scholar
Qi, Y. P., Wang, Z. H., Wang, Y., Ueno, K. & Wang, X. D. 2007. Stop 1: Nashui section. In Pennsylvanian and Lower Permian Carbonate Successions from Shallow Marine to Slope in Southern Guizhou. Guide Book for Field Excursion C3, pp. 8–16. XVI International Congress on the Carboniferous and Permian, June 21–24, 2007, Nanjing, China.Google Scholar
Ramsbottom, W. H. C. 1973. Transgressions and regressions in the Dinantian: a new synthesis of British Dinantian stratigraphy. Proceedings of the Yorkshire Geological Society 39, 567–607.Google Scholar
Rexroad, C. B. 1957. Conodonts from the Chester Series in the type area of south western Illinois. Illinois Sate Geological Survey Report 199, 1–43.Google Scholar
Rhodes, F. H. T., Austin, R. L. & Druce, E. C. 1969. British Avonian (Carboniferous) conodont faunas and their value in local and intercontinental correlation. Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural History), Geology, Supplement 5, 1–313.Google Scholar
Richards, B. C. 2010. SCCS Annual Report 2009. Newsletter on Carboniferous Stratigraphy 28, 14–26.Google Scholar
Richards, B. C. & Task Group . 2003. Progress report from the Task Group to establish a GSSP close to the existing Visean-Serpukhovian boundary. Newsletter on Carboniferous Stratigraphy 21, 6–10.Google Scholar
Ross, C. A. & Ross, J. 1988. Late Palaeozoic transgressive-regressive deposition. In Sea Level Changes: an Integrated Approach. Society of Economic Paleontologists and Mineralogists, Special Publication 42, 159–77.Google Scholar
Roundy, P. V. 1926. Mississippian formations of San Saba county, Texas. Introduction the Microfauna. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 146, 1–23.Google Scholar
Sanz-Lopez, J. 2002. Devonian and Carboniferous pre-Stephanian rocks from the Pyrenees. In Palaeozoic Conodonts from Northern Spain (eds Garcia-López, S. & Bastida, F.), pp. 367–89. Cuadernos del Museo Geominero no. 1.Google Scholar
Sanz-Lopez, J., Blanko-Ferrera, S. & García-López, S. 2004. Taxonomy and evolutionary significance of some Gnathodus species (conodonts) from the Mississippian of the northern Iberian Peninsula. Revista Española de Micropaleontología 36, 215–30.Google Scholar
Sanz-Lopez, J., Blanco-Ferrera, S., Sánchez De Posada, L. C. & García-López, S. 2007. Serpukhovian conodonts from northern Spain and their biostratigraphic application. Paleontology 50, 883–904.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skompski, S. 1996. Stratigraphic position and facies significance of the limestone bands in the subsurface Carboniferous succession of the Lublin Upland. Acta Geologica Polonica 46, 171–268.Google Scholar
Skompski, S., Alekseev, A., Meischner, D., Nemirovskaya, T., Perret-Mirouse, M.-F. & Varker, W. J. 1995. Conodont distribution across the Visean/Namurian boundary. Courier Forschungsinstitut Senckenberg 188, 177–209.Google Scholar
Somerville, H. E. A. & Somerville, I. D. 1999. Late Viséan conodontbiostratigraphy and biofacies in the Kingscourt area, Ireland. Bolletino della Società Paleontologica Italiana 37(2/3), 443–64.Google Scholar
Somerville, I. D. 2008. Biostratigraphic zonation and correlation of Mississippian rocks in Western Europe: some case studies in the late Visean/Serpukhovian. Geological Journal 43, 209–40.Google Scholar
Varker, W. J. & Sevastopulo, G. D. 1985. The Carboniferous System. Part 1: Conodonts of the Dinantian Subsystem from Great Britain and Ireland. In A Stratigraphic Index of Conodonts (eds Higgins, A. C. & Austin, R. L.), pp. 167–209. Ellis Horwood, Chichester.Google Scholar
Veevers, J. J. & Powell, C. M. 1987. Late Paleozoic glacial episodes in Gondwanaland reflected in transgressive-regressive depositional sequences in Euramerica. Geological Society of America Bulletin 98, 475–87.Google Scholar
Wang, L. T., Lu, Y. B., Zhao, S. J. & Luo, J. H. 1994. Permian Lithofacies: Palaeogeography and Mineralization in South China. Book series on lithofacies and paleogeography in South China. Geological Publishing House, Beijing, 149 pp. (in Chinese with English abstract).Google Scholar
Wang, X., Qi, Y., Lambert, L., Wang, Z., Wang, Y., Hu, K., Lin, W. & Chen, B. 2011. A potential Global Standard Stratotype-Section and Point of the Moscovian Stage (Carboniferous). Acta Geologica Sinica 85, 366–72.Google Scholar
Wang, X. D. & Jin, Y. G. 2005. Achievements in the establishment of the Carboniferous GSSPs. Journal of Stratigraphy 29(2), 147–53 (in Chinese with English abstract).Google Scholar
Wang, X. D., Ueno, K., Mizuno, Y. & Sugimaya, T. 2001. Late Paleozoic faunal, climatic, and geographic changes in the Baoshan block as a Gondwana-derived continental fragment in southwest China. Palaeogeography Palaeoclimatology Palaeoecology 170, 197–218.Google Scholar
Wang, Y. & Jin, Y. G. 2000. Permian palaeogeographic evolution of the Jiangnan Basin, South China. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatolgy, Palaeoecology 160, 35–44.Google Scholar
Wang, Z. H. & Qi, Y. P. 2003. Report on the Upper Visean-Serpukhovian conodont zonation in South China. Newsletter on Carboniferous Stratigraphy 21, 22–4.Google Scholar
Wang, Z. H., Qi, Y. P. & Wang, X. D. 2008. Stage boundaries of the Pennsylvanian in the Nashui Section, Luodian of Guizhou, south China. Acta Micropalaeontologica Sinica 25(3), 205–14.Google Scholar
Wirth, M. 1967. Zur Gliederung des höheren Paläozoikums (Givet-Namur) im Gebiet des Quinto Real (Westpyrenäen) mit Hilfe vn Conodonten. Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie, Abhandlungen 127, 179–224.Google Scholar
Wright, V. P. 1986. Facies sequences on a carbonate ramp: the Carboniferous Limestone of South Wales. Sedimentology 33, 221–41.Google Scholar
Youngquist, W. & Miller, A. K. 1949. Conodonts from the Late Mississippian Pella Beds of South-Central Iowa. Journal of Paleontology 23, 617–22.Google Scholar
Zhang, L. X. 2000. Carboniferous. In Stratigraphical Studies in China (1979–1999) (ed. Nanjing Institute of Geology and Palaeontology, Chinese Academy of Sciences), pp. 129–64. China University of Science and Technology Press, Hefei (in Chinese).Google Scholar
Ziegler, W. 1960. Die Conodonten aus den Geröllen des Zechsteinkonglomerates von Rossenray (südwestlich Rheinberg/Niederrhein). Fortschritte in der Geologie von Rheinland und Westfalen 6, 391–405.Google Scholar