Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T22:03:36.807Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On the Overlap of the Upper Gault in England and on the “Red Chalk“ of the Eastern Counties

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

F. L. Kitchin  and
J. Pringle
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Norfolk.—The so-called Red Chalk is visible in two quarries at Snettisham, but the exposures there are less favourable for investigation than the well-known section to be seen in the cliff north of Hunstanton. The thin rock-bands there comprised under this title have given rise to much discussion amongst geologists, whose views have been summarized by Mr. W. Whitaker and by the late A. J. Jukes-Browne. The Red Rook, not more than 4 feet thick at this locality, has been variously referred by different authors to the whole Gault formation, to the Upper Gault, to the Upper Greensand, and to the Lower Chalk. So long ago as 1869, the Rev. T. Wiltshire published an illuminating paper in which he described the characters of the three beds that can be recognized as composing the red band. Chiefly on the basis of the fossils found in the two lower beds he made a correlation with the Upper Gault of Folkestone. The late Professor Judd and Professor C. Barrois emphasized the fact that the Red Rock is unconformable with the underlying Greensand, but conformable with the overlying Chalk. Professor Barrois was so impressed by this fact and by the unequivocal character of the fauna that he correlated the red beds with his zone of Ammonites inflatus (Upper Gault).

Type
Original Articles
Information
Geological Magazine , Volume 59 , Issue 5 , May 1922 , pp. 194 - 200
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1922

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 194 note 1 Whitaker, W., “On Things in General and the Red Chalk of Norfolk in Particular”: Proc. Norwich Geol. Soc., vol. i, pt. vii, 1883, pp. 213–22.Google Scholar Jukes-Browne, A. J., The Cretaceous Rocks of Britain, vol. i (Mem. Geol. Surv.), 1900, pp. 294, 296.Google Scholar

page 194 note 2 Wiltshire, T., “On the Red Chalk of Hunstanton”: Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., vol. xxv, 1860, p. 185.Google Scholar

page 195 note 1 Woodward, S., An Outline of the Geology of Norfolk, p. 54, Norwich, 1833.Google Scholar

page 195 note 2 Gunn, J., “Notes on the Red Chalk of Hunstanton”: Proc. Norwich Geol. Soc., pt. i, Session 1877–1878, p. 23, Norwich, 1878.Google Scholar

page 196 note 1 “Summary of Progress for 1920”: Mem. Geol. Surv., 1921, p. 63.Google Scholar

page 196 note 2 Hill, W., “On the Lower Betta of the Upper Cretaceous Series in Lincolnshire and Yorkshire”: Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., vol. xliv, 1888, p. 347.Google Scholar

page 197 note 1 Lamplugh, G. W., “On the Sub-divisions of the Speeton Clay”: Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc.., vol. xlv, 1889, p. 603, fig. 8.Google Scholar

page 197 note 2 Loc. cit. Also “On the Speeton Series in Yorkshire and Lincolnshire”: Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc.., vol. lii, 1896, p. 197.Google Scholar

page 197 note 3 Ussher, W. A. E., Jukes-Browne, A. J., and Strahan, A., “The Geology of the Country around Lincoln”: Mem. Geol. Surv., 1888, p. 82.Google Scholar Pringle, J., “Palaeontological Notes on the Donington Borehole of 1917.” “Summary of Progress for 1918”: Mem. Geol. Surv., 1919, p. 51.Google Scholar

page 197 note 4 Whitaker, W., “The Well-Section at Holkham Hall, Norfolk”: Proc, Norwich Geol. Soc.., pt. i, Session 1877–1878, p. 16, Norwich, 1878.Google Scholar