Published online by Cambridge University Press: 06 March 2019
1 Egypt Protests: Obama Sharply Questions Mubarak Pledge to Stay in Power, The Huffington Post, Feb. 10, 2011, available at: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/02/10/egypt-protests-obama-mubarak_n_821736.html (last accessed: 23 December 2011).Google Scholar
2 Posner, Eric A., The Perils of Global Legalism 38 (2009).Google Scholar
3 Id. at xii.Google Scholar
4 Id. Google Scholar
5 Id. at xii.Google Scholar
6 Id. at 8.Google Scholar
7 Id. at 35.Google Scholar
8 Id. at 41.Google Scholar
9 Id. at 42. Google Scholar
10 Id. at 58–70.Google Scholar
11 Id. at 41.Google Scholar
12 Id.Google Scholar
13 Id. at 71.Google Scholar
14 Id. at 81.Google Scholar
15 Id. at 99.Google Scholar
16 Id. at 92–94.Google Scholar
17 Id. at 224.Google Scholar
18 Id. at 149.Google Scholar
19 Id. at 164.Google Scholar
20 Id. at 205.Google Scholar
21 Id. at 225.Google Scholar
22 Eric Posner, Eric Posner on his Book The Perils of Global Legalism, Rorotoko, Nov. 2, 2009, available at: http://www.rorotoko.com/index.php/article/eric_posner_book_interview_perils_global_legalism (last accessed: 23 December 2011).Google Scholar
23 Id. Google Scholar
24 Trachtman, Joel P., Book Reviews: Eric A. Posner. The Perils of Global Legalism, 20 European Journal of International law 1263,1267 (2009).Google Scholar
25 Id. at 1268.Google Scholar
26 Id. Google Scholar
27 See The Perils of Global Legalism, supra note 2, at 207–225.Google Scholar
28 Sheehy, Benedict & Feaver, Donald, The Perils of Global Legalism, 20 Law & Politics Book Review 503 (2010), available at: http://www.lpbr.net/2010/09/perils-of-global-legalism.html (last accessed: 23 December 2011).Google Scholar
29 Id. at 504.Google Scholar
30 Eric Posner, supra note 22.Google Scholar
31 Sheehy & Feaver, supra note 28, at 503.Google Scholar
32 One of the main proponents of this view is Justice Antonin Scalia of the United States Supreme Court. See for instance, his dissent in Morrison v Olson, (1988) 487 US 654.Google Scholar
33 See US Const. art. III, s.2: “The judicial Power shall extend to all Cases, in Law and Equity, arising under this Constitution….to Controversies….”Google Scholar
34 Operation Dismantle v. The Queen, [1985] 1 S.C.R. 441.Google Scholar
35 Solomon, Solon, The Justiciability of International Disputes: The Advisory Opinion on Israel's Security Fence as a Case Study (2009).Google Scholar
36 Sheehy & Feaver, supra note 28 at 508; see also Trachtman, supra note 24 at 1269.Google Scholar
37 Donnelly, Jack, Universal Human Rights in Theory & Practice (2nd ed., 2004).Google Scholar
38 See for instance, Harmen Van Der Wilt, Bilateral Agreements Between the United States and State Parties to the Rome Statute: Are they Compatible with the Object and Purpose of the Statute, 18 Leiden Journal of International Law 93 (2005).Google Scholar