Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-29T07:38:08.989Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Future of the European Court of Human Rights

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 March 2019

Michael O'Boyle

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

It is a pleasure to be back in Dublin and to have this opportunity to speak to you about the Court and its future. Reading the outpourings of denigration in the newspapers recently you can be forgiven for believing that the Court is about to be towed into the middle of the Rhine and scuppered by a coalition of unhappy State Parties. So where does the future of the Court lie and how should one respond to such media buffetings?

Type
Articles
Information
German Law Journal , Volume 12 , Issue 10: Special Issue Legitimacy and the Future of the European Court of Human Rights , 01 October 2011 , pp. 1862 - 1877
Copyright
Copyright © 2011 by German Law Journal GbR 

References

1 McCann v. the United Kingdom, 324 Eur. Ct. H.R. (ser. A, 1995). Lautsi v. Italy, Eur. Ct. H. R., judgment of 18 March 2011, available at: http://www.echr.coe.int/echr/resources/hudoc/lautsi_and_others_v_italy.pdf (last accessed: 27 September 2011).Google Scholar

2 Hirst v. the United Kingdom (no. 2), 2005-IX Eur. Ct. H.R.Google Scholar

3 S. and Marper v. the United Kingdom, 48 E.H.R.R.50 (2009).Google Scholar

4 Slack, James, Named and Shamed: The European Human Rights Judges Wrecking British Law, Daily Mail, 5 Feb. 2011, available at: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1353860/Named-shamed-The-European-human-rights-judges-wrecking-British-law.html#ixzz1QNTg8Uz2 (last accessed: 27 September 2011).Google Scholar

5 Groves, Jason, 'Europe's human rights court is out of control… we must pull out': Call by top British judge after ruling that prisoners should get the vote, Daily Mail, 7 Feb. 2011, available at: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1354362/Europes-human-rights-court-control–pull-Call-British-judge-ruling-prisoners-vote.html#ixzz1QNV45SLd (last accessed: 27 September 2011).Google Scholar

6 Hoffmann, Lord Leonard, The Universality of Human Rights, 125 Law Quarterly Review 416 (2009).Google Scholar

7 Id. at 430.Google Scholar

8 Id. at 431.Google Scholar

9 Taxquet v. Belgium, Eur. Ct. H. R., judgment of 16 November 2010, available at: http://www.menschenrechte.ac.at/orig/10_6/Taxquet (last accessed: 27 September 2011).Google Scholar

10 A, B and C v. Ireland, 2032 Eur. Ct. H. R. (2010), available at: http://cmiskp.echr.coe.int/tkp197/view.asp?item=1&portal=hbkm&action=html&highlight=A%2C%20|%20B%20|%20C%20|%20v.%20|%20Ireland&sessionid=78694016&skin=hudoc-en (last accessed: 27 September 2011).Google Scholar

11 Lautsi, supra note 1.Google Scholar

12 See the cases Al-Skeini and Others v. United Kingdom (GC), Eur. Ct. H. R, judgment of 7 July 2011, available at: http://www.bailii.org/eu/cases/ECHR/2010/2032.html (last accessed: 19 September 2011) and Al-Jedda v. United Kingdom (GC), Eur. Ct. H. R., judgment of 7 July 2011, available at: http://www.bailii.org/eu/cases/ECHR/2011/1092.html (last accessed: 27 September 2011).Google Scholar

13 Georgia v. Russia – pending before the Grand Chamber, available at: http://cmiskp.echr.coe.int/tkp197/search.asp?sessionid=72691944&skin=hudoc-cc-en (last accessed: 27 September 2011).Google Scholar

14 Malone v. United Kingdom, 82 Eur. Ct. H.R. (ser. A, 1984).Google Scholar

15 S.W. v. United Kingdom, 335-B Eur. Ct. H.R. (ser. A, 1995) and C.R. v United Kingdom, 335-C Eur. Ct. H.R. (ser. A, 1995).Google Scholar

16 Saunders v. United Kingdom, Eur. Ct. H. R., judgment of 17 December 1996, available at: http://www.unhcr.org/refworld/topic,4565c22520,4565c25f263,3ae6b68010,0.html (last accessed: 27 September 2011).Google Scholar

17 Wingrove v. United Kingdom, 1996-V Eur. Ct. H. R., judgment of 25 November 1996, available at: http://cmiskp.echr.coe.int/tkp197/view.asp?item=1&portal=hbkm&action=html&highlight=Wingrove%20|%20v%20|%20United%20|%20Kingdom&sessionid=78694016&skin=hudoc-en (last accessed: 27 September 2011).Google Scholar

18 Young, James and Webster v. United Kingdom, 44 Eur. Ct. H.R. (ser. A, 1981).Google Scholar

19 See also O'Boyle, Michael The legitimacy of Strasbourg Review: Time for a reality check, in Mélanges en L'Honneur de jean-Paul Costa, La Conscience Des Droits (2011).Google Scholar

20 For an interesting discussion on the duty to have regard to human rights outside national boundaries, see Christopher McCrudden's blog, Duties beyond borders: the external effects of our constitutional debate, UK Constitutional Law Group, available at: http://ukconstitutionallaw.org/2011/05/30/christopher-mccrudden-duties-beyond-borders-the-external-effects-of-our-constitutional-debates/ (last accessed: 27 September 2011).Google Scholar

21 Cordula Dröge, Positive Verpflichtungen der Staaten in der Europäischen Menschenrechtskonvention 238 (2003).Google Scholar

22 See Statement By the President of the European Court of Human Rights, Requests For Interim Measures (Rule 39 of the Rules of Court), (11 Feb. 2011), available at: http://www.echr.coe.int/NR/rdonlyres/B76DC4F5-5A09-472B-802C-07B4150BF36D/0/20110211_ART_39_Statement_EN.pdf (last accessed: 27 September 2011).Google Scholar

23 See the Interlaken Declaration of 19 February 2010, available at: http://www.eda.admin.ch/etc/medialib/downloads/edazen/topics/europa/euroc.Par.0133.File.tmp/final_en.pdf (last accessed: 27 September 2011).Google Scholar

24 Id. Google Scholar

25 There was no consensus reached on this issue during the Izmir Conference. See the Izmir Declaration of 26-27 April 2011, and the various speeches made by State representatives during the meeting. Available at http://www.coe.int/t/dghl/standardsetting/conferenceizmir/Declaration%20Izmir%20E.pdf (last accessed: 27 September 2011).Google Scholar

26 As has been recently stated by the UK Bill of Rights Commission in its Interim Advice to the Government, the Court should not be the first port of call for aggrieved applicants, and it should not be examining cases in the tens of thousands but in the hundreds. See Reform of the European Court of Human Rights – Our Interim Advice to Government, available at: http://www.justice.gov.uk/downloads/about/cbr/cbr-court-reform-interim-advice.pdf (last accessed: 27 September 2011).Google Scholar

27 Costa, Jean-Paul, Speech at the Solemn Hearing on the Occasion of the Opening of the Judicial Year, in Dialogue Between Judge: The Convention is Yours 30, 35. Available at: http://www.echr.coe.int/NR/rdonlyres/3F410EB0-4980-4562-98F1-B30641C337A5/0/DIALOGUE_2010_EN.pdf (last accessed: 27 September 2011).Google Scholar

28 See inter alia, Council of Europe, President Costa's speech at the Interlaken Conference (Febr. 18-19 2010). Available in French at: http://www.eda.admin.ch/etc/medialib/downloads/edazen/topics/europa/euroc/ouvert.Par.0005.File.tmp/cour.pdf (last accessed: 27 September 2011).Google Scholar

29 Id. Google Scholar

30 Council of Europe, Explanatory Report to the Protocol No. 11 to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, restructuring the control machinery established thereby (1994). Available at: http://conventions.coe.int/treaty/en/reports/html/155.htm (last accessed: 27 September 2011).Google Scholar

31 Council of Europe, Committee of Ministers, Report of the Evaluation Group to the Committee of Ministers on the European Court of Human Rights (2001), available at: https://wcd.coe.int/wcd/ViewDoc.jsp?id=226195&Lang=fr#P364_39957 (last accessed: 27 September 2011).Google Scholar

32 The Right Honorable Lord Woolf et. al., Review of the Working Methods of the European Court of Human Rights (2005). Available at: http://www.echr.coe.int/NR/rdonlyres/40C335A9-F951-401F-9FC2-241CDB8A9D9A/0/LORDWOOLFREVIEWONWORKINGMETHODS.pdf (last accessed: 27 September 2011).Google Scholar

33 Council of Europe, Committee of Ministers, Report of the Group of Wise Persons to the Committee of Ministers (2006). Available at: https://wcd.coe.int/wcd/ViewDoc.jsp?id=1063779&Site=CM (last accessed: 27 September 2011).Google Scholar

34 Declaration, Interlaken, supra note 23.Google Scholar

35 See Rule 61 of Rules of Court. 1 April 2011. Available at: http://www.echr.coe.int/NR/rdonlyres/6AC1A02E-9A3C-4E06-94EF-E0BD377731DA/0/RulesOfCourt_April2011.pdf (last accessed: 27 September 2011).Google Scholar

36 Report of the Group of Wise Persons to the Committee of Ministers, supra note 33 at paras. 76-86.Google Scholar

37 See Lautsi, supra note 1.Google Scholar

38 See the Izmir Declaration, supra note 25. The Advisory Opinion proposal was eventually endorsed at point D of the Izmir Declaration of 26-27 April 2011 as follows. “The Conference:Google Scholar

39 Bosphorus Hava Yolları Turizm ve Ticaret Anonim Şirketi v. Ireland, 2005-VI Eur. Ct. H. R. (2005) and M.S.S. v Belgium and Greece, 53 E.H.R.R. 2 (2011).Google Scholar