Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T07:22:09.729Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Ins and Outs of Transnational Private Regulatory Governance: Legitimacy, Accountability, Effectiveness and a New Concept of “Context”

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 March 2019

Peer Zumbansen

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The continuing proliferation of transnational private regulatory governance challenges conceptions of legal authority, legitimacy and public regulation of economic activity. The pace at which these developments occur is set by a coalescence of multiple regime changes, predominantly in commercial law areas, but also in the field of internet governance, corporate law and labor law, where the rise to prominence of private actors has become a defining feature of the emerging transnational regulatory landscape. One of the most belabored fields, the transnational law merchant or, lex mercatoria, has gained the status of a poster child, as it represents a laboratory for the exploration of “private” contractual governance in a context, in which the assertion of public or private authority has itself become contentious. The ambiguity surrounding many forms of today's contractual governance in the transnational arena echoes that of the far-reaching transformation of public regulatory governance, which has been characteristic of Western welfare states over the last few decades. What is particularly remarkable, however, is the way in which the depictions of “private instruments” and “public interests” in the post-welfare state regulatory environment have given rise to a rise in importance of social norms, self-regulation and a general anti-state affect in the assessment of judicial enforcement or administration of contractual arrangements. A central challenge resulting from case studies such as the transnational law merchant is from which perspective we ought to adequately study and assess the justifications, which are being offered for a contractual governance model, which prioritizes and seeks to insulate “private” arrangements from their embeddedness in regulated market contexts, on both the national and transnational level.

Type
Articles
Information
German Law Journal , Volume 13 , Issue 12: 5Th CLPE Comparative Research in Law and Political Economy Network: Transnational Private Regulatory Governance: Regimes, Dialogue, Constitutionalization , 01 December 2012 , pp. 1269 - 1281
Copyright
Copyright © 2011 by German Law Journal GbR 

References

1 See for example, Tim Büthe & Walter Mattli, The New Global Rulers. The Privatization of Regulation in the World Economy (2012).Google Scholar

2 Abrams, Philip, Notes on the Difficulty of Studying the State, 1 J. of Hist'l Socio. 58 (1988); Michel-Rolph Trouillot, The Anthropology of the State in the Age of Globalization: Close Encounters of the Deceptive Kind, 42 Current Anthropology, 125 (2001).Google Scholar

3 Willke, Helmut, Smart Governance. Governing the Global Knowledge Society (2007).Google Scholar

4 Zumbansen, Peer, Law After the Welfare State: Formalism, Functionalism and the Ironic Turn of Reflexive Law, 56 Amer. J. of Comp. L. 769-805 (2008).Google Scholar

5 Luhmann, Niklas, Die Weltgesellschaft, 57 Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie 1 (1970), reprinted in Luhmann, Soziologische Aufklärung 2 (2nd ed., 2005) 51-71, at 55: “Kognitives Erwarten sucht sich selbst, normatives Erwarten sucht sein Objekt zu ändern. Lernen oder Nichtlernen – das ist der Unterschied.”Google Scholar

6 Ladeur, Karl-Heinz, Die rechtswissenschaftliche Methodendiskussion und die Bewältigung des gesellschaftlichen Wandels, 64 RabelsZ 60-103 (2000); id., Constitutionalism and the State of the ‘Society of Networks’: The Design of a New ‘Control Project’ for a Fragmented Legal System, 2:4 Transnational Legal Theory 463-476 (2011). See also Luhmann, Weltgesellschaft, supra, note 5, at 57: “Offensichtlich ist mit Hilfe der normativen Mechanismen, vor allem des Rechts, auf der Ebene politisch konstituierter Regionalgesellschaften eine evolutionär unwahrscheinliche Hochleistung stabilisiert und damit erwartbar gemacht worden – nämlich die verlässliche Motivation zu nahezu beliebig spezialisierbarem Handeln. […] Es könnte sein, daß diese eigentümliche Kombination von Recht und Politik gerade in ihrer besonderen Leistungsfähigkeit eine Fehlspezialisierung der Menschheitsentwicklung war, die sich, vorläufig jedenfalls, nicht auf das System der Weltgesellschaft übertragen lässt.”Google Scholar

7 For more background and discussion, see Peer Zumbansen, Lochner Disembedded: The Anxieties of Law in a Global Context, Ind'a J. of Glob. Leg. Stud. (2012), forthcoming, available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2174017 (last accessed: 1 December 2012).Google Scholar

8 For a fine analysis of the transnational realm, see Daniela Caruso, Private Law and State-Making in the Age of Globalization, 39 NYU J. of Int'l L. & Pol. 1-74 (2006).Google Scholar

9 Reich, Robert, Supercapitalism. The Transformation of Business, Democracy, and Everyday Life (2007); Sol Picciotto, Constitutionalizing Multilevel Governance? 6 Int'l J. of Const'l L. 457-479 (2008).Google Scholar

10 Johnson, Simon & Kwak, James, 13 Bankers. The Wall Street Takeover and the Next Financial Meltdown (2010).Google Scholar

11 Teubner, Gunther, Regulatory Law: Chronicle of a Death Foretold, 1 Social & Legal Studies 451-475 (1992) [orig.: Gunther Teubner, ‘Regulatorisches Recht: Chonik eines angekündigten Todes', (1992) ARSP Beiheft 54 140-161]; hereto, see Peer Zumbansen, Post-regulatorisches Recht: Chronik einer angekündigten Karriere, in Soziologische Jurisprudenz. Festschrift für Gunther Teubner zum 65. Geburtstag (Gralf-Peter Calliess, Andreas Fischer-Lescano, Dan Wielsch and Peer Zumbansen eds., 2009), English version: Post-regulatory Law: Chronicle of a Career Foretold, Faculty Seminar Presentation, McGill University, Faculty of Law, 18 February 2009, available at: http://www.mcgill.ca/files/legal-theory-workshop/PZumbansen_Post-Regulatory-Law.pdf (last accessed: 1 December 2012).Google Scholar

12 Teubner, Gunther, Autopoiesis in Law and Society: A Rejoinder to Blankenburg, 18 L. & Soc. Rev. 291-301 (1984).Google Scholar

13 See e.g. Schmidt-Preuss, Matthias, Verwaltung und Verwaltungsrecht zwischen gesellschaftlicher Selbstregulierung und staatlicher Steuerung, 56 Veröffentlichungen der Vereinigung der Deutschen Staatsrechtslehrer 160-234 (1996); The Province of Administrative Law (Alfred Aman Jr., Administrative Law for a New Century, in Michael Taggart ed., 1997); Thomas Vesting, Zwischen Gewährleistungsstaat und Minimalstaat: Zu den veränderten Bedingungen der Bewältigung öffentlicher Aufgaben in der ‘Informations- oder Wissensgesellschaft’, in Verwaltungsrecht in der Informationsgesellschaft (Wolfgang Hoffmann-Riem and Eberhard Schmidt-Assmann eds., 2000).Google Scholar

14 Wiethölter, Rudolf, Die Wirtschaftspraxis als Rechtsquelle, in Das Rechtswesen – Lenker oder Spiegel der Gesellschaft? (Paul Bockelmann ed., 1971); Rudolf Wiethölter, Recht-Fertigungen eines Gesellschafts-Rechts, in Rechtsverfassungsrecht. Recht-Fertigung zwischen Privatrechtsdogmatik und Gesellschaftstheorie (Christian Joerges and Gunther Teubner eds., 2003).Google Scholar

15 See Amstutz, Marc, Ibi Societas, Ibi lus: The Conundrum of the Concept of World Law. Comments on Calliess & Zumbansen, Rough Consensus and Running Code: A Theory of Transnational Private Law (Hart: 2010, paperback 2012), Manuscript for Rough Consensus and Running Code Workshop, European University Institute, Florence, 13 May 2011, at 7.Google Scholar

16 Sornarajah, Muthucumaraswamy, Power and Justice: Third World Resistance in International Law, 10 Sing. Yearbk. of Int'l L. 19-57 (2006); Gus Van Harten/Martin Loughlin, Investment Treaty Arbitration as a Species of Global Administrative Law, 17 Eur. J. of Int'l L. 121-150 (2006).Google Scholar

17 See e.g. the description of transnational financial regulation by Julia Black/David Rouch, The development of global markets as rule-makers: engagement and legitimacy, Law and Financial Markets Review 218-233 (2008).Google Scholar

18 See e.g. Larry Catá Backer, The OECD Guidelines for Multinational Corporations: Using Soft Law to Operationalize a Transnational System of Corporate Governance, (2009) Law at the End of the Day (Blog), available at: http://lcbackerblog.blogspot.com/2009/03/oecd-guidelines-for-multinational.html (last accessed: 1 December 2012), and Gregory Shaffer, On Terence C. Halliday and Bruce G. Carruthers, Bankrupt: Global Lawmaking and Systemic Financial Crisis. Stanford, Stanford University Press, 2010 Panel at the SASE 2010 Annual Meeting, Philadelphia, USA', 1-24 Socio-Economic Review 1-24 (2011).Google Scholar

19 Rittich, Kerry, Functionalism and Formalism: Their latest Incarnations in Contemporary Development and Governance Debates, 55 Univ. of Tor. L. J. 853-868 (2005), and Sundhya Pahuja, Decolonising International Law (2011).Google Scholar

20 See e.g. César Rodríguez-Garavito, Ethnicity.gov. Global Governance, Indigenous Peoples, and the Right to Prior Consultation in Social Minefields 18 (1)Ind'a J. of Glob. Leg. Stud. 263 (2011); see also Kamphuis and Seck, in this issue.Google Scholar

21 Zumbansen, Peer, Review of Niklas Luhmann, Law as a Social System, 15(3) Social & Legal Studies 453 (2006).Google Scholar

22 Kamphuis, Seck, Sukdeo, this issue.Google Scholar

23 See Rodríguez-Garavito, supra note 20; see also Boaventura de Sousa Santos, Beyond Abyssal Thinking (2007) Eurozine, available at: http://www.eurozine.com/articles/2007-06-29-santos-en.html (last accessed: 1 December 2012).Google Scholar

24 An illustration of this continues to be the debate between H.L.A. Hart and L. Fuller. See Herbert Lionel Adolphus Hart, Positivism and the Separation of Law and Morals, 71 Harv. L. Rev. 593 (1957/8), and Lon Luvois Fuller, Positivism and Fidelity to Law – A Reply to Professor Hart, 71 Harv. L. Rev. 630 (1957/8). See the essays concerning this debate in The Hart-Fuller Debate in the Twenty-First Century (Peter Cane ed., 2010).Google Scholar

25 For an insightful scrutiny, see Gunther Teubner, Constitutional Fragments. Societal Constitutionalism and Globalization (2012); see the comprehensive engagement with this work by Karl-Heinz Ladeur, The evolution of the law and the possibility of a “global law” extending beyond the sphere of the state – simultaneously, a critique of the “self-constitutionalisation” thesis”, Ancilla Iuris (2012), available at: http://www.anci.ch/_media/beitrag/ancilla2012_220_ladeur.pdf (last accessed: 1 December 2012).Google Scholar

26 See Pistor, Katharina, Towards a Legal Theory of Finance, Columbia Public Law Research Paper No. 12-323 (2012), available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2178000; John Biggins, “Targeted Touchdown” and “Partial Liftoff”: Post-Crisis Dispute Resolution in the OTC Derivatives Markets and the Challenge for ISDA, 13(12) Germ. L. J. 1297 (2012), available at: http://germanlawjournal.com/pdfs/Vol13-No12/PDF_Vol_13_No_12_1297-1325_Articles_Biggins.pdf (last accessed: 1 December 2012); Colin Scott, Beyond Taxonomies of Private Authority in Transnational Regulation, 13(12) Germ. L. J. 1326 (2012), available at: http://germanlawjournal.com/pdfs/Vol13-No12/PDF_Vol_13_No_12_1326-1335_Articles_Scott.pdf (last accessed: 1 December 2012).Google Scholar

27 Mikadze, Kirsten, Public Participation in Global Environmental Governance and the Equator Principles: Potentials and Pitfalls, 13(12) Germ. L. J. 1383 (2012), available at: http://germanlawjournal.com/pdfs/Vol13-No12/PDF_Vol_13_No_12_1383-1408_Articles_Mikadze.pdf (last accessed: 1 December 2012); Sara Seck, Home State Regulation of Environmental Human Rights Harms as Transnational Private Regulatory Governance, 13(12) Germ. L. J. 1360 (2012), available at: http://germanlawjournal.com/pdfs/Vol13-No12/PDF_Vol_13_No_12_1360-1382_Articles_Seck.pdf (last accessed: 1 December 2012); Andrian Lozinski, The Equator Principles: Evaluating the Exposure of Commercial Lenders to Socio-Environmental Risk, 13(12) Germ. L. J. 1487 (2012), available at: http://germanlawjournal.com/pdfs/Vol13-No12/PDF_Vol_13_No_12_1487-1507_Articles_Lozinski.pdf (last accessed: 1 December 2012); Gail Henderson, Institutional Investors as Transnational Environmental Regulators? The Limits of Responsible Investing as Environmental Regulation, 13(12) Germ. L. J. 1409 (2012), available at: http://germanlawjournal.com/pdfs/Vol13-No12/PDF_Vol_13_No_12_1409-1434_Articles_Henderson.pdf (last accessed: 1 December 2012).Google Scholar

28 Sarro, Douglas, Do Lenders Make Effective Regulators? An assessment of the Equator Principles on project finance, 13(12) Germ. L. J. 1522 (2012), available at: http://germanlawjournal.com/pdfs/Vol13-No12/PDF_Vol_13_No_12_1522-1555_Articles_Sarro.pdf (last accessed: 1 December 2012).Google Scholar

29 Janczuk-Gorywoda, Agnieszka, Public-Private Hybrid Governance for Electronic Payments in the European Union, 13(12) Germ. L. J. 1435 (2012), available at: http://germanlawjournal.com/pdfs/Vol13-No12/PDF_Vol_13_No_12_1435-1455_Articles_Janzcuk-Gorywoda.pdf (last accessed: 1 December 2012).Google Scholar

30 Porter, Tony, Transnational Private Regulation and the Changing Media of Rules, 13 Germ. Law Journal 1508 (2012), available at: http://germanlawjournal.com/pdfs/Vol13-No12/PDF_Vol_13_No_12_1508-1521_Articles_Porter.pdf (last accessed: 1 December 2012); Matthew Chan, Psychological Actors – Behavioral Analysis of Equator Principles Adoption, 13(12) Germ. L. J. 1336 (2012), available at: http://germanlawjournal.com/pdfs/Vol13-No12/PDF_Vol_13_No_12_1336-1359_Articles_Chan.pdf (last accessed: 1 December 2012).Google Scholar

31 See Scott, , supra note 26, and Porter, supra note 30, both in this issue.Google Scholar

32 Koskenniemi, Martti & Leino, Paivo, Fragmentation of International Law: Post-modern Anxieties, Leiden J. of Int'l L. 553-579 (2002)Google Scholar

33 Bhatia, Amar, 'In a Settled Country, Everyone Must Eat': Four Questions About Transnational Private Regulation, Migration and Migrant Work, 13(12) Germ. L. J. 1282 (2012), available at: http://germanlawjournal.com/pdfs/Vol13-No12/PDF_Vol_13_No_12_1282-1296_Articles_Bhatia.pdf (last accessed: 1 December 2012).Google Scholar

34 Kamphuis, Charis, Canadian Mining Companies and Domestic Law Reform: A Critical Legal Account, 13(12) Germ. L. J. 1456 (2012), available at: http://germanlawjournal.com/pdfs/Vol13-No12/PDF_Vol_13_No_12_1456-1486_Articles_Kamphuis.pdf (last accessed: 1 December 2012).; Vanisha Sukdeo, Transnational Governance Models: Codes of Conduct, and Monitoring Agencies as Tools to Increase Workers’ Rights, 13(12) Germ. L. J. (2012), available at: http://germanlawjournal.com/pdfs/Vol13-No12/PDF_Vol_13_No_12_1556-1567_Articles_Sukdeo.pdf (last accessed: 1 December 2012).Google Scholar

35 Leibfried, Stephan & Zürn, Michael eds., Transformations of the State? (2005); Peer Zumbansen, Law after the Welfare State: Formalism, Functionalism and the Ironic Turn of Reflexive Law, 56 Amer. J. of Comp. L. 769-805 (2008), available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1128144 (last accessed: 1 December 2012); reprinted in Nils Jansen & Ralf Michaels eds., Beyond the State – Rethinking Private Law 349-386 (2008).Google Scholar

36 Shaffer, Gregory, Transnational Legal Process and State Change, 37 Law & Social Inquiry 229 (2011).Google Scholar

37 Berman, Paul Schiff, From International Law to Law and Globalization, 43 Col. J. of Transnational L. 485-556 (2005); Ulrich Sieber, Rechtliche Ordnung in einer Globalen Welt, 41 Rechtstheorie 151-198 (2010).Google Scholar

38 Michaels, Ralf, Global Legal Pluralism, Duke Public Law & Legal Theory Research Paper No. 259 (2009), available online at: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1430395 (last accessed: 1 December 2012); Paul Schiff Berman, Global Legal Pluralism, 80 South. Cal. L. Rev. 1155-1237 (2007).Google Scholar

39 Jessup, Philip, Transnational Law (1956); Clive Schmitthoff, Nature and Evolution of the Transnational Law of Commercial Transactions, in The Transnational Law of International Commercial Transactions (Norbert Horn and Clive Schmitthoff eds., 1982); Christian Tietje & Karsten Nowrot, Laying Conceptual Ghosts of the Past to rest: The Rise of Philip C. Jessup's ‘Transnational Law’ in the Regulatory Governance of the International Economic System, 50 Essays in Transnational Law (2006).Google Scholar

40 Aman, Alfred & Zumbansen, Peer, Transnational Law: Actors, Norms, Processes (2013) (forthcoming). Google Scholar