No CrossRef data available.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 06 March 2019
1 (2006).Google Scholar
2 For a relatively positive assessments of regional trade regimes and the benefits of protectionist policies with respect to trade in the United States, see Robert Z. Lawrence and Robert E. Litan, Saving Free Trade: A Pragmatic Approach (1986); For the complimentary association between regional trade agreements and multilateral trade regimes see Echandi, Roberto, Regional Trade Integration in the 1990s: Reflections of Some Trends and Their Implication for the Multilateral Trade System, 4 Journal of International Economic Law 367 (2001); For a stinging critique of regional trade agreements and their incompatibilities with the multilateral trade regime, see Jagdish Natwarlal Bhagwati, The World Trading System at Risk (1991), Regionalism versus Multilateralism, 15 The World Economy 535 (1992) as well as Arvind Panagariya & T. N. Srinivasan, The New Regionalism: A Benign or Malign Growth?, in The Uruguay Round and Beyond: Essays in Honor of Arthur Dunkel 221 (Jagdish Natwarlal Bhagwati et al. eds., 1998); For the challenges associated with multilateralism more generally see Zampetti, Americo Beviglia, A Rough Map of Challenges to the Mulitlateral Trading System at the Millennium, in Efficiency, Equity, and Legitimacy: The Multilateral Trading System at the Millennium 34 (Roger B. Porter, ed., 2001); For the classic economic treatment of the subject see Joseph Viner, The Customs Union Issue (1950).Google Scholar
3 For a background, compare Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage (Peter A. Hall & David Soskice, eds. 2001).Google Scholar
4 Supra note 1, at 11.Google Scholar
5 Id. at 197.Google Scholar
6 Id. at 74-88.Google Scholar
7 Id. 67-74.Google Scholar
8 Porta, Rafael La, Florencio Lopez-de-Silane, Shleifer, Andrei & Vishny, Robert W., Legal Determinants of External Finance, 52 Journal of Finance 1131 (1997).Google Scholar
9 See, in that respect, the constructive contributions by Pistor, Katharina, Berkowitz, Daniel & Richard, Jean-François, The Transplant Effect, 51 American Journal of Comparative Law 163 (2003).Google Scholar
10 Conflicting Law in a Common Market? The NAFTA Experiment, 76 Chicago-Kent Law Review 1789 (2001).Google Scholar
11 See, for example, Joerges, Christian, The Challenges of Europeanization in the Realm of Private Law: A Plea for a New Legal Discipline (EUI Working Paper LAW No. 12, 2004) available at http://www.iue.it/PUB/law04-12.pdf.Google Scholar
12 Supra note 1, at 100.Google Scholar
13 See for example, the work by Stephan, Paul B., Regulatory Cooperation and Competition: The Search for Virtue, in Transatlantic Regulatory Cooperation: Legal Problems and Political Prospects 167 (George A. Bermann et al., eds., 2000).Google Scholar
14 Supra note 1, at 91.Google Scholar
15 Id. at 91-92.Google Scholar
16 Id. at 110-113.Google Scholar
17 Id. at 129.Google Scholar
18 Id. at 194-195.Google Scholar
You have
Access