No CrossRef data available.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 03 November 2011
To an increasing number of people the idea that a religion which means to be something more than an heroic moral idealism has any significant place in the modern world seems open to grave doubts. Moreover, a large body of traditional metaphysical doctrines and systems are being subjected to much the same sort of criticism which religion is called upon to face. Three general arguments are used to show that both traditional religion and traditional metaphysics are no longer able to do what clear thinking and enlightened practice demand.
1 Taylor, A. E.. The Problem of Conduct, p. 471Google Scholar.
2 Dewey, and Tufts, , Ethics, p. 422Google Scholar.
3 Quoted by Inge, W. R. in Contentio Veritatis, p. 309Google Scholar.
4 Sabatier, Outlines of a Philosophy of Religion, p. 325.
5 Caird, , The Critical Philosophy of Immanuel Kant, vol. ii, p. 620Google Scholar.
6 Royce, , The Religious Aspect of Philosophy, p. 193Google Scholar.