Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T10:49:05.787Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Hoover on Harpagmos Reviewed, with a Modest Proposal Concerning Philippians 2:6*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 June 2011

J. C. O'Neill
J. C. O'Neill
Affiliation:
University of Edinburgh
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Notes and Observations
Information
Harvard Theological Review , Volume 81 , Issue 4 , October 1988 , pp. 445 - 449
Copyright
Copyright © President and Fellows of Harvard College 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Novum Testamentum Graece, 26th ed.

2 Hoover, R. W.. “The Harpagmos Enigma: A Philological Solution.” HTR 64 (1971) 95–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar. (Numbers within parentheses in this note refer to pages from Hoover's article, unless otherwise indicated.) The claim for Hoover was made by N. T. Wright.ρπαγμς and the Meaning of Philippians 2:5–11.”, JTS n.s. 37 (1986) 321 –52, esp. 339.

3 Cf. Meyer, H. A. W., Kritisch Exegetisches Handbuch über die Briefe Pauli an die Philipper, Kolosser und an Philemon (4th ed.; Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1874Google Scholar) 72.

4 Professor Moule has always insisted on this as the philological starting point for considering our problem. Moule, C. F. D., “Further Reflections on Philippians 2:5– 11,” in Gasque, W. Ward and Martin, Ralph P., eds., Apostolic History and the Gospel: Biblical and Historical Essays Presented to F. F. Bruce on His 60th Birthday (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1970Google Scholar) 264–76.

5 Jaeger, W. W., “Eine stilgeschichtliche Studie zum Philipperbrief,” Hermes 50 (1915) 537–53Google Scholar.

6 Ibid., 267.

7 Ross, John, “APΠAΓMOΣ (Philippians II 6),” JTS 10 (1909) 573–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

8 Meyer, Exegetisches Handbuch, 71–78, 85–88; Alford, Henry, The Greek Testament (2d ed.; London, 1857Google Scholar) 3. 159: Ross, “APΠAΓMOΣ”: Moule, “Philippians 2:5–11,” 266–68.