Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T11:24:15.131Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Hegel and Husserl: Two Phenomenological Reactions to Kant

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 January 2017

Tom Rockmore
Tom Rockmore*
Affiliation:
Peking University, Chinarockmore@pku.edu.cn
Get access

Abstract

The widespread tendency to understand phenomenology on a Husserlian model makes it incomparable with other views. I will use the term ‘phenomenology’ in a wider sense to refer to approaches to cognition based on phenomena. From the latter angle of vision, ’phenomenology’ includes not only Husserl and the Husserlians but also a wider selection of thinkers stretching back to early Greece. Although this will enlarge the scope of what counts as phenomenology, I will not be claiming that everyone is a phenomenologist. I will, however, be arguing that Kant, Hegel and Husserl are phenomenologists, or again phenomenological thinkers, and that Hegel and Husserl can be understood through their different reactions to Kantian phenomenology.

Type
Articles
Information
Hegel Bulletin , Volume 38 , Special Issue 1: Hegel and Phenomenology , May 2017 , pp. 67 - 84
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Hegel Society of Great Britain 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allison, H. E. (2004), Kant’s Transcendental Idealism: An Interpretation and Defense. New Haven: Yale University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bolzano, B. (1972), Theory of Science, ed. R. George. Oxford: Oxford University Press and Berkeley CA: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faye, E. (2007), Heidegger, l’introduction du nazisme dans la philosophie, Autour des séminaires inédits de 1933–1935. Paris: Albin Michel.Google Scholar
Fink, E. (1952), ‘L’analyse intentionelle et le problème de la pensée speculative’, in Problèmes actuels de la phenomenology. Paris: Brouwer.Google Scholar
Forster, M. (1998), Hegel’s Idea of a Phenomenology of Spirit. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Grondin, J. (1985), ‘Review of Phénoménologie et métaphysique ’, ed. J. L. Marion and G. Planty-Bonjour. Paris: P. U. F., coll. Épiméthée, 1984, Laval théologique et philosophique 41:2: 274–276.Google Scholar
Grondin, J. (2003), Hans-Georg Gadamer: A Biography , trans. J. Weinsheimer. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. (2010), The Science of Logic, trans. G. di Giovanni. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Heidegger, M. (1992), History of the Concept of Time, trans. T. Kisiel. Bloomington IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Husserl, E. (1954), Die Krisis der europäischen Wissenschaften und die transzendentale Phänomenologie. Eine Einleitung in die phänomenologische Philosophie, ed. W. Biemel (Husserliana VI). The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Husserl, E. (1965), Philosophy and the Crisis of Humanity, trans. Q. Lauer. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
Husserl, E. (1970), Logical Investigations, trans. J. N. Findlay, 2 vols. New York: Humanities Press.Google Scholar
Husserl, E. (1970), The Crisis of European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology, trans. D. Carr. Evanston IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Husserl, E. (1974), L’Origine de la géométrie, trans. J. Derrida. Paris: P. U. F.Google Scholar
Husserl, E. (1990), On the Phenomenology of the Consciousness of Internal Time (1893–1917), trans. J. B. Brough. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Husserl, E. (1999), Cartesian Meditations, trans. D. Cairns. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Kant, I. (1910ff), Akademie-Ausgabe. Berlin: Königlich Preußische Akademie der Wissenschaften.Google Scholar
Kant, I. (1999), Correspondence, trans. and ed. A. Zweig. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kern, I. (1964), Husserl und Kant. The Hague: Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Kohák, E. (1978), Ideas and Experience: Edmund Husserl’s Project of Phenomenology in Ideas I. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kojève, A. (1947), Introduction à la lecture de Hegel, ed. R. Queneau. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Kosok, M. (1978), ‘The Formalization of Hegel’s Dialectical Logic’, in A. MacIntyre (ed.), Hegel: A Collection of Critical Essays. Garden City NY: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Kosok, M. (2003), ‘The Logic of Negation’, in D. Henrich, Between Kant and Hegel: Lectures on German Idealism, ed. D. S. Pacini. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Kusch, M. (1995), Psychologism: A Case Study in the Sociology of Philosophical Knowledge. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Mohanty, J. N. (1997), Phenomenology: Between Essentialism and Transcendental Phenomenology. Evanston IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Moran, D. (2000), Introduction to Phenomenology. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Natanson, M. (1974), Edmund Husserl: Philosopher of Infinite Tasks. Evanston IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Orth, E. W. (1982), ‘Der Terminus Phänomenologie bei Kant und Lambert und seine Verbindbarkeit mit Husserls Phänomenologiebegriff’, Archiv für Begriffsgeschicte 2: 231–249.Google Scholar
Sokolowski, R. (1970), The Formation of Husserl’s Concept of Constitution. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Souche-Dagues, D. (1990), Hégélianisme et dualisme. Réflexions sur le phénomène. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
Spiegelberg, H. (1960), The Phenomenological Movement: A Historical Introduction. 2 vols. The Hague: Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Spiegelberg, H. (1982), The Phenomenological Movement: A Historical Introduction. Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Welton, D. (2000), The Other Husserl: The Horizons of Transcendental Phenomenology. Bloomington IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar