Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T12:02:02.327Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Hegel, Mind, and Mechanism: Why Machines Have No Psyche, Consciousness, or Intelligence

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 June 2015

Richard Dien Winfield
Richard Dien Winfield*
Affiliation:
University of Georgia, winfield@uga.edu
Get access

Abstract

The rise of computers and robots, heralded in science fiction and pervading ever more daily experience, has fostered a rampant temptation to model mind as a mechanism and expect machines one day to simulate all mental reality. This temptation reflects more than technological developments, however. It arises from the perennial dilemma of two complementary approaches to mind that proceed from the assumption of a mind/body duality: one conceiving mind to be wholly immaterial and the other reducing mind to inanimate matter. Exploring the difficulties of these views puts us in a position to evaluate the relation of mind and machine, helped along the way by key insights from Hegel.

The notion that mind cannot be material seems confirmed in every moment of self-consciousness, whose purely temporal flow of mental content testifies to the apparent nonspatial existence of mind. Yet so long as mind is construed as immaterial, it lacks the resources to have any temporal ordering, possess any unity, or retain any specifically mental character. Deprived of materiality, mental life is hardly distinguishable from a succession of logical categories that exhibit determinacy in general rather than anything particular to mind. The possibilities of any non-logical content are excluded. Lacking any embodiment, mind has nothing with which passively to receive content in the manner of sensibility, or to retrieve and refashion any such sensible content in images. Mind could perhaps generate conceptual content, but this would be indistinguishable from the thoughts that logic produces in its thinking of thinking.

Type
Articles
Information
Bulletin of the Hegel Society of Great Britain , Volume 30 , Issue 1-2: number 59/60 , 2009 , pp. 1 - 18
Copyright
Copyright © The Hegel Society of Great Britain 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aristotle, (1984), Metaphysics in The Complete Works of Aristotle, Volume Two, ed. Barnes, Jonathan. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Dennett, Daniel C. (1996), Kinds of Minds: Toward an Understanding of Consciousness. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Dreyfus, H. L. (1992), What Computers Still Can't Do: A Critique of Artificial Reason. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Harris, E. E. (1993), The Foundations of Metaphysics in Science. Atlantic Highlands: Humanities Press.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. (1971), Philosophy of Mind: Part Three of the Encyclopaedia of the Philosophical Sciences (1830), trans. Wallace, William. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. (1975), Logic: Being Part One of the Encyclopaedia of the Philosophical Sciences (1830), trans. Wallace, William. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. (1976), Science of Logic, trans. Miller, A. V.. New York: Humanities Press.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. (1977), Phenomenology of Spirit, trans. Miller, A. V.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Husserl, E. (1960), Cartesian Meditations: An Introduction to Phenomenology, trans. Cairns, Dorion. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.10.1007/978-94-017-4952-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, I. (1998), Critique of Pure Reason, trans. Guyer, Paul & Wood, Allen W.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Penrose, R. (1989), The Emperor's New Mind: Concerning Computers, Minds, and the Laws of Physics. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plato, (1997), Republic, in Complete Works, ed. Cooper, John M.. Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar
Searle, J. R. (1998), Mind, Language and Society: Philosophy in the Real World. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Spinoza, (2002), Ethics, in Complete Works, trans. Shirley, Samuel. Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar
Taylor, C. (1985), Human Agency and Language: Philosophical Papers 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winfield, R. D. (2006), From Concept to Objectivity: Thinking Through Hegel's Subjective Logic. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L. (1953), Philosophical Investigations, 3 rd ed., trans. Anscombe, G. E. M.. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar