Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T04:05:35.008Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Clericals, Anticlericals and the Women's Movement in France under the Third Republic

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 February 2009

James F. McMillan
James F. McMillan
Affiliation:
University of York
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Most historians of modern France would agree that the quarrel between clericals and anticlericals was one of the most significant political issues in French politics between 1870 and 1914, especially in the period before the passing of the law which separated Church and State in 1905. The charges brought against the Catholic Church by the anticlericals were many, but until recently few students of nineteenth-century France have commented on the fact that one of their most serious allegations was that the Church oppressed women. Perhaps the most celebrated formulation of this theory came from the pen of the historian Michelet who, in a virulent polemic entitled Priests, women and the family, bitterly attacked the powers which priests were reputed to exercise over the female mind through the institution of the confessional, to the great detriment of marital life and family unity.

Type
Articles
Information
The Historical Journal , Volume 24 , Issue 2 , June 1981 , pp. 361 - 376
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 For a good general introduction see McManners, J., Church and state in France1870–1914 (London, 1972).Google Scholar

2 On the development of the anticlerical movement, see Rémond, R., L'anticléricalisme en France de 1815 à nos jours (Paris, 1975)Google Scholar. Also, Zeldin, T., France 1848–1945. 11, Intellect, taste and anxiety (Oxford, 1977), 1024–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

3 Michelet, J., Du priêtre, de la femme et de la famille (Paris, 1845)Google Scholar, discussed by Zeldin, T., ‘The conflict of moralities’ in Zeldin, T. (ed.), Conflicts in French society: anticlericalism, education and morals in the nineteenth century (London, 1970).Google Scholar

4 Ferry, J., Discours sur l'égaliti de I'education (Paris, 1870).Google Scholar

5 Bidelman, P. K., ‘The feminist movement in France: the formative years 1858–1889’, Ph.D thesis (Michigan State University, 1975).Google Scholar

6 Evans, R. J., The feminists: women's emancipation movements in Europe, America and Australasia 1840–1920 (London, 1977), p. 124.Google Scholar

7 Bidelman, ‘Feminist movement’, p. 14.

8 Ruether, R. R. (ed.), Religion and sexism. Images of women in the Jewish and Christian Traditions (New York, 1974)Google Scholar; Noonan, J. T., Contraception. A history of its treatment by the catholic theologians and canonists (Harvard, 1965).Google Scholar

9 Encyclical Rerum novarum, reproduced in Fremantle, A. (ed.), The social teachings of the Catholic Church (New York, 1963), pp. 20–56.Google Scholar

10 Pope Benedict XV, letter of 27 Dec. 1917, quoted in Monks of Solesmes (ed.), Papal teachings, The woman in the modern world (Boston, 1959), p. 27.Google Scholar

11 Zeldin, ‘The conflict of moralities’.

12 Proudhon, P. J., De la justice dans la Révolution et dans L'Eglise (Paris, 1858)Google Scholar; idem, La pornocratie m lesfemmes dans les temps modernes (Paris, 1875)Google Scholar. The formula ‘courtisane ou ménagère’ is used in Contradictions économiques. La propriété, 11 (Paris, 1846), 197.Google Scholar

13 Simon, J., La femme au vingtième siècle (Paris, 1892), p. 67.Google Scholar

14 Naquet, A., Le divorce (Paris, 1877).Google Scholar

15 Acomb, E. M., The French laic laws 1879–1889: the first anticlerical campaign of the Third Republic (New York, 1941), pp. 193–202.Google Scholar

16 Ibid. p. 196.

17 Zeldin, T., France 1848–1945. 1, Ambition, love and politics (Oxford, 1973), 357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

18 Pelletier, M., L'émancipation sexuelle de la femme (Paris, 1911)Google Scholar; idem, La désegrégation de la famille (Paris, n.d.)Google Scholar; idem, Vamour el la maternité (Paris, n.d.).Google Scholar

19 In the feminist society associated with the newspaper La Française, only 27 out of 121 members were single and of these only one by deliberate choice. (La Française, 22 Sept. 1907.)

20 Congrès international de la condition el des droits desfemmes: compte-rendu (Paris, 1901), pp. 215 ff.Google Scholar

21 Conges national des droits civils et du suffrage des femmes, 26–28 juin 1908, compte-rendu par Mme Oddo-Deflou (Paris, 1911), p. 90.Google Scholar

22 Ibid. pp. 95 ff.

23 Dupanloup, Mgr F., M. Duruy et l'éducation des files: lettre à un de ses collègues (Paris, 1867)Google Scholar; idem, Seconde lettre sur M. Duruy et l'éducation des files (Paris, 1867)Google Scholar. See also Horvath, S. A., ‘Victor Duruy and the controversy over secondary education for girls’, French Historical Studies, VIII (1975).Google Scholar

24 Dupanloup, Mgr F., Lettres sur l'éducation des files et sur les etudes qui conviennent aux femmes dans lemonade, 2nd edn (Paris, 1879).Google Scholar

25 Archives nationales (AN) F 17 8755.

26 Sée, C., Lycées et collèges de jeunes filles (Paris, 1884).Google Scholar

27 For the fullest discussion to date of the secondary education of girls see Mayeur, F., l'enseignement secondaire des jeunes filles sous la Troisième République (Paris, 1977).Google Scholar

28 For example Mile Marguérite Clément of the UFSF, who taught at the girls’ lycée at Versailles.

29 Mayeur, Enseignement secondaire, pp. 388 ff.

30 The Fédération Féministe Universitaire was largely the creation of Marie Guérin, a primary teacher, who started a campaign in 1903 for equal pay for women teachers. Its newspaper was L;Action Féministe.

31 Mayeur, Enseignement secondaire, pp. 553 ff.

32 Coireault, G., ‘Les cinquantes premières années de l'enseignement secondaire féminine 1880–1930, thèse complémentaire (Poitiers, 1940), pp. 129–30.Google Scholar

33 Marichy, J.-P., La deuxième chambre dans la vie politique française depuis 1875 (Paris, 1969) pp. 618 ff.Google Scholar

34 Impressions Sénat (1919), vol. 5, no. 564 and Journal Officiel (J.O.) Senat (7 Nov. 1922).

35 Albistur, M. and Armogathe, D., Histoire du féminisme français du moyen âge à nos jours (Paris, 1977) P. 381.Google Scholar

36 Goguel, F., La politique des partis sous la Troisime République 1871–1939, 3rd edn (Paris, 1958), pp. 222–3.Google Scholar

37 Abbé de, Gibergues, Les devoirs des hommes envers les femmes (Paris, 1903), p. 178.Google Scholar

38 Ibid. pp. 187–8.

39 Naudet, Abbé P., Pour la femme: études féminists (Paris, 1903).Google Scholar

40 Abbé de, Sertillanges, Féminisms et christianisme (Paris, 1921), p. 337.Google Scholar

41 Ibid. p. 171.

42 Semaines sociales de France. La femme dans la société (Nancy, 1927), p. 121.Google Scholar

43 Ibid. pp. 55 ff.

44 Félix-Faure-Goyau, L., La femme au foyer et dans la cité (Paris, 1917).Google Scholar

45 Semaines socials. Rigaud, Cf. L., Les droits de la femme (Paris, 1927).Google Scholar

46 Barthélemy, J., Le vote des femmes (Paris, 1920).Google Scholar

47 Bidelman, ‘Feminist movement’, p. 106.

48 J. O. Chambre, 15 May 1919

49 J. O. Serial, 7 Nov. 1922.

50 Grinberg, S., Historie du mouvement suffragiste depuis 1848 (Paris, 1926).Google Scholar

51 Lecomte, G., La femme dans la société moderne (lecture organized by the Ligue Frariçaise: Paris, 1925).Google Scholar

52 Sowerwine, C., Les femmes et le socialisme: une siècle d'histoire (Paris, 1978).Google Scholar

53 Delatour, Y., ‘Les effets de la guerre sur la situation de la Française d'après la presse feminine 1914–1918', diplôme d'études supérieures (Paris, 1965), p. 23.Google Scholar

54 Archives de la Préfecture de Police (A.P.P.) B/a 1651, correspondance, 13 Feb. 1935.

55 Rollet, H., Andrée Butillard et leféminisme chrétien (Paris, 1960).Google Scholar

56 Fletcher, M., Christian Feminism: a charter of rights and duties (London, 1915)Google Scholar; M. Turmann, Initiatives féminines (Paris, 1903.)Google Scholar

57 Bidelman, ‘Feminist movement’, p. 92. Evans, The feminists, p. 134.

58 Brault, E., La franc-maçonnerie et l'émancipation des femmes (Paris, 1954).Google Scholar

59 Pelletier, M., L'admission des femmes dans la franc-maçonnerie (Paris, 1905).Google Scholar

60 Mellor, A., La vie quotidienne de lafranc-maçonnerie française de xviiie siècle à nos jours (Paris, 1973), pp. 205–7.Google Scholar

61 I discuss the development of organized feminism in my forthcoming book, Housewife or harlot: the place of women in French society1870–1940 (Harvester Press).Google Scholar

62 Information on these literary feminists may be obtained in two books by Edith Thomas, Les pétroleuses (Paris, 1963Google Scholar) and Louise Michel (Paris, 1971).Google Scholar

63 Bidelman, P. K., ’The politics of French feminism: Léon Richer and the Ligue Française pour le Droit des Femmes 1882–1891’, Historical Reflexions, III (1976), p. 106.Google Scholar

64 Bibliothèque Marguerite Durand (BMD): dossier Jeanne Schmall.

65 B.M.D.: dossier Jeanne Oddo-Deflou.

66 Bidelman, ‘Feminist movement’, p. 81.

67 Ibid. p. 105.

68 Exposition universelle internationale de 1889: Actes du congrès international des œuvres el institutions féminines (Paris, 1890).Google Scholar

69 Deuxième congrès international des œceuvres et institutions féminines: compte-rendu des travaux, 4 vols. (Paris, 1902).Google Scholar

70 B.M.D.: dossier Conseil National des Femmes Françaises. See also AN F 713226: dossier La propagande féminine en faveur de la paix.

71 La Française, 9 May 1914.

72 Bidelman, ‘Feminist movement’, p. 91.

73 BMD: dossier Sarah Monod.

74 BMD: dossier Mme Siegfried.

75 BMD: dossier Mme de Witt-Schlumberger.

76 Cf. Bogelot, I., Trente arts de solidarité 1877–1908 (Paris, 1908).Google Scholar

77 BMD: dossier Avril de Sainte-Croix.