Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T03:30:55.995Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Constitutions old and new: Henrion de Pansey before and after the French revolution*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 February 2009

J. H. M. Salmon
J. H. M. Salmon
Affiliation:
Bryn Mawr College
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Henrion de Pansey (1742–1829) is an important but neglected constitutional historian whose views on the French past served as a commentary on the unwritten and written constitutions of his own age. A feudal lawyer before the revolution and an appeal judge under Napoleon and the restored Bourbons, he published a variety of works combining liberal sentiment with judicial traditionalism. His career illustrates the shift of moderate conservative opinion across the revolutionary divide. The alteration in his political thought is best understood through its conjunction with the three historical modes prevalent in his time: a discontinuous approach, accepting the past as a series of different regimes interrupted by revolutions; a developmental view, charting the progressive growth of institutions from seeds planted in antiquity; and a fundamentalist habit of thought that saw change as decline from pristine perfection. The jurists of sixteenth-century France remained Henrion's most admired models, and he used his roseate vision of the early modern French monarchy as a sometimes critical commentary on the constitutions designed in his own day. In prerevolutionary days he recast the ideas of the sixteenth-century rationalizer of feudalism, Charles Dumoulin, into Enlightenment terms. After the revolution, De l'Autoritéjudiciaire (1810) depicted the moderating role of the judiciary as defenders of past constitutions, and formed an oblique commentary on Napoleon's civil code. Des Pairs et de l'ancienne constitution (1816) appraised the charter of 1814. It accepted a measure of popular participation in government, but held judicial expertise essential in legislation. Des Assemblées nationales (1826) shifted the emphasis from judicial oversight to the separation of powers and representative government, although Henrion, like Guizot and the doctrinaires, remained critical of popular democracy.

Type
Articles
Information
The Historical Journal , Volume 38 , Issue 4 , December 1995 , pp. 907 - 931
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Mcllwain, Charles Howard, Constitutionalism: ancient and modem (Ithaca, N.Y., 1947 [1940]), pp. 1–2Google Scholar. Mcllwain's schema was completed by his student, Church, William Farr, in Constitutional thought in sixteenth-century France (Cambridge, Mass., 1941)Google Scholar. The idea of a fundamental constitutional shift in early modern France had also been that of Henrion de Pansey.

2 Pocock, J. G. A., The ancient constitution and the feudal law (Cambridge, 1985 [1957]), pp. 257–8.Google Scholar

3 Montesquieu, , De l'Esprit des lois (ed. Gonzague, True, 2 vols., Paris, 1944 [1748]), I, 174 [XI: vi], I, 90 [VI: X], II, 256 [XXX: i].Google Scholar

4 Robert, Badinter (ed.), Une autre justice: contributions à l'histoire de la justice sous la révolution française (Paris, 1989), pp. 22, 57–68.Google Scholar

5 Antoine, Loisel, Pasquier ou dialogue des advocats (ed. André, Dupin, Paris, 1844), p. 158.Google Scholar

6 Pansey, P.-P.-N. Henrion de, Oeuvres judiciaires (ed. Louis, Rozet, Paris, 1843)Google Scholar; Choix de mémoires et de plaidoyers de M M. Henrion de Pansey et Henrion de Saint-Amand (ed. Taillandier, A., Paris, n.d. [c. 1825])Google Scholar; Un Mot sur les contentieux du conseil d'état: entretien de M. le premier président…publié par M. Cotelle (Paris, 1830).Google Scholar

7 Mackrell, J. Q. C., The attack on ‘feudalism’ in eighteenth-century France (London, 1973), pp. 54–5Google Scholar; Church, William F., ‘The decline of the French jurists as political theorists, 1660–1789’, French Historical Studies, V (1967), 1–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

8 Kelley, Donald R., Historians and the law in postrevolutionary France (Princeton, 1984), pp. 60–3.Google Scholar

9 André, Jardin, Histoire de la libéralisme politique de la crise de l'absolutisme à la constitution de 1875 (Paris, 1985), pp. 265–6.Google Scholar

10 A thèse en droit that considers Henrion's works in general is Renée, Laude'sHenrion de Pansey (1742–1820) (Lille, 1941)Google Scholar, but this concentrates on the technical aspects of his treatment of feudal and administrative law. Carcassonne's, E.Montesquieu et le problème de la constitution française au XVIIIe siècle (Paris, 1927)Google Scholar briefly mentions Henrion's early and later books as influenced by Montesquieu (pp. 198, 390). Two passages in Fitzsimmons's, Michael P.The Parisian order of barristers and the French revolution (Cambridge, Mass., 1987, pp. 19, 120)Google Scholar described Henrion's reputation before 1789 as ‘a distinguished scholar and author whose talents were regarded as exceptional’, and, after the revolutionary era, as ‘one of the most brilliant jurists in all of France’.

11 See below, pp. 929–30.

12 I owe this idea to Donald Kelley. See n. 8 above.

13 Eloge de Dumoulin par M. Henrion de Pensey [sic] avocat au parlement (Geneva, 1769).Google Scholar

14 Jean-Louis, Thireau, Charles Du Moulin (1500–1566) (Geneva, 1980), pp. 102–3, 257–61).Google Scholar

15 Eloge de Dumoulin, pp. 8, 6, 9.

16 E.g. Henrion's plea on behalf of the comte de Rennepont against the villages of Roche, Cultru and Betaincourt over the use of woods and pasturage. See also his Examen de la question de savoir si les domaines congéables de la Bretagne, et particulièrement ceux de la vicomté de Rohan, peuvent être assimilés à la main-morte (n.p., n.d. [1789]).

17 Eloge de Dumoulin, p. 7.

18 Plaidoyer pour Roc, nègre: contre le sieur Poupet in Choix de mémoires, pp. 51, 55.Google Scholar

19 Traité des fiefs de Dumoulin (Paris, 1773), préface, p. i.Google Scholar

20 ibid. p. 3.

21 ibid. p. 17. Cf. Eloge de Dumoulin, p. 32.

22 Traité des fiefs, pp. 576–9.

23 De l'Esprit des lois, II, 264–9 [XXVIII: XXXVIII–XXXIX] on the reforms of Saint-Louis; 1, 19–20 [II: iv] on intermediary bodies; 1, 174–5 [XI; vii] on the distribution rather than the separation of powers.

24 Traité des fiefs, préface p. ii. Cf. Daguesseau, , Oeuvres (13 vols., Paris, 1759–1789), I, 365.Google Scholar

25 Eloge de Mathieu Molé: discours prononcé à la rentrée de la conférence publique des avocats au Parlement de Paris le 13 Janvier 7775 in Choix de mémoires, p. 93.

26 ibid. p. 86.

27 Cotelle, , Un Mot sur les contentieux, p. 5.Google Scholar

28 Dissertations féodales par M. Henrion de Pansey avocat au Parlement (2 vols., Paris, 1789), I, 29.Google Scholar

29 ibid. pp. 256–9.

30 Baker, Keith Michael, Inventing the French revolution (Cambridge, 1990), pp. 31–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

31 Jacob-Nicolas, Moreau, Leçons de morale, de politique et de droit public puisées dans l'histoire de notre monarchic, ou nouveau plan d'étude de l'histoire de France (Paris, 1773), p. 54Google Scholar. On Mably's view see Elie, Carcassonne, Montesquieu, p. 369.Google Scholar

32 Moreau, , Leçons de morale, p. 81.Google Scholar

33 ibid. pp. 85–6.

34 ibid. pp. 126–9.

35 Quoted by Carcassonne, , Montesquieu, p. 407.Google Scholar

36 Baker, , Inventing the French revolution, p. 152.Google Scholar

37 E.g. Dale Van, Kley, The Damiens affair and the unraveling of the ancien régime, 1750–1770 (Princeton, 1984)Google Scholar; ‘Du parti janséniste au parti patriote: l'ultime sécularisation d'une tradition religieuse à l'époque du chancelier Maupeou, 1770–1775’, Jansénisme et révolution (ed. Maire, C., Paris, 1990), pp. 115–30Google Scholar; and Joynes, D. C., ‘Jansenists and ideologues: opposition theory in the parlement of Paris, 1750–1775’ (Ph. D. dissertation, University of Chicago, 1981).Google Scholar

38 Gin, P.-L.-C., Des vrais principes du gouvernement françois (Paris, 1787), pp. 20, 71, 157.Google Scholar

39 Gin, P.-L.-C., Analyse raisonnée du droit françois par la comparaison des dispositions des loix romaines et de celle de la coutume de Paris suivant l'ordre des loix civiles de Domat (Paris, 1782), p. 15.Google Scholar

40 Gin, , Vrais principes, pp. 75–9.Google Scholar

41 de Sibert, Gautier, Variations de la monarchic françoise, dans son gouvernement politique, civil et militaire avec l'examen des causes qui les ont produites (3 vols., Paris, 1765), III, 375.Google Scholar

42 Ibid, III, 1, 2.

43 Simon, Schama, Citizens: a chronicle of the French revolution (New York, 1989), p. 299.Google Scholar

44 Badinter, (ed.), Une autre justice, p. 64Google Scholar

45 Anderson, F. M. (ed.), The constitutions and other select documents illustrative of the history of France, 1789–1901 (Minneapolis, 1904), p. 35.Google Scholar

46 Badinter, (ed.), Une autre justice, p. 60.Google Scholar

47 Kelley, , Historians and the law, p. 54.Google Scholar

48 La Compétence des juges de la paix in Oeuvres judiciaires, p. 1.

49 Jean-Baptiste, Dubos, Histoire critique de l'établissement de la monarchic française dans les Gaules (2 vols., Paris, 1742 [1734]), II, 23–9.Google Scholar

50 Juges de la paix in Oeuvres judiciaires, p. 5.

51 De l'Autorité judiciaire (Paris, 1818 [1810]), p. 122Google Scholar. On the differences between the two editions see below, p. 922. All the references used here are identical in both editions.

52 ibid. pp. 15–16.

53 ibid. p. 70.

54 ibid. p. 30.

55 ibid. p. 1.

56 ibid. pp. 65, 67.

57 Julian, Swann, ‘Parlement, politics and the parti janséniste: the Grand Conseil affair, 1755–1756’, French History, VI (1992), 456Google Scholar. The idea of the increased prestige of the parlement as a result of its association with the cour des pairs seems to have come from Montesquieu, who himself cited a number of sixteenth-century sources (De l'Esprit des lois, II, 169 [XXVIII: xxxix]). To treat the ordinance of 1363 as a fundamental law, however, was inexact. See Jean-Pierre, Labatut, Les Dues et Pairs de France au XVIIe siècle (Paris, 1972), p. 54Google Scholar. See also Sarah, Hanley, The lit de justice of the kings of France (Princeton, 1983), p. 114Google Scholar, where the views of the sixteenth-century antiquarian, Jean Du Tillet, on the peers and the parlement are discussed.

58 De l'Autorité judiciaire, p. 70.

59 De l'Esprit des lois, 164 [XI: vi].

60 De l'Autorité judiciaire, p. 113.

61 Anderson, (ed.), The constitutions and other select documents, p. 457.Google Scholar

62 Des Pairs et de l'ancienne constitution françoise (Paris, 1816), p. 85.Google Scholar

63 ibid. p. 90.

64 ibid. p. 119.

65 ibid. pp. 91–2.

66 ibid. p. 121.

67 ibid. p. 111.

68 ibid. pp. 115–16.

69 ibid. p. 120.

70 ibid. pp. 174–7. Cf. Retz, , Mémoires (ed. Maurice, Allem, Paris, 1956), p. 74.Google Scholar

71 Des Pairs de France, pp. 8–9, 178. Cf. De l'Autorité judiciaire, pp. 126, 64.

72 de Pansey, Henrion, Du Pouvoir municipal, de sa nature, de ses attributions et de ses rapports avec l'autorité judiciaire (Paris, 1820), p. 6.Google Scholar

73 On Henrion's circle see Laude, , Henrion de Pansey, p. 266Google Scholar. Several details of Henrion's personal life and milieu are provided in La Physiologic du goût (1825) by his fellow judge and gourmet, Brillat Savarin. See Giles, Macdonogh, Brillat-Savarin: the judge and his stomach (London, 1992).Google Scholar

74 Cf. Du Pouvoir municipal, p. 6 and Des Assemblées nationales en France (Paris, 1826), p. 32Google Scholar; De l'Autorité judiciaire, p. 48 and Des Assemblées nationales, p. 62.

75 Des Assemblées nationales, p. 5.

76 ibid. p. 12.

77 ibid. p. 16.

78 ibid. p. 80.

79 ibid. p. 82.

80 ibid. pp. 335, 341.

81 ibid. p. 63.

82 ibid. p. 64.

83 ibid. pp. 202–7.

84 ibid. pp. 98–102.

85 ibid. p. 248.

86 ibid. pp. 277–313.

87 Procès-verbal de l'installation de M. le baron Henrion de Pansey en qualité de premier président (Paris, 1828), p. 12.Google Scholar

88 François, Guizot, Histoire des origines du gouvemement représentatif en Europe (2 vols., Paris, 1851 – the lectures of 1820–1822), 93Google Scholar. Cf. Histoire de la civilisation en Europe (ed. Pierre, Rosanvallon, Paris, 1985), pp. 316. 325.Google Scholar

89 Procés-verbal de rentrée de la cour de cassation du 5 novembre 1828 (Paris, 1828), p. 4Google Scholar. Cf. Oeuvres inédites de Michel de L'Hôpital (ed. Dufey, , Paris, 1826), p. 17.Google Scholar

90 Sylvia, Nealy, ‘Michel de L'Hospital and the Traité de la réformation de la justice: a case of misattribution’, French Historical Studies, XIV (1986), 339–66.Google Scholar

91 Procès-verbal de rentrée, p. 5.

92 Mignet, F. A., Histoire de la révolution française depuis 1789 jusqu'en 1814 (2 vols., Paris, 1827 [1824]), I, 4–5.Google Scholar

93 Thiers, A., Histoire de la révolution française (10 vols., Paris, 1857 [vol. I 1823], 1, 3.Google Scholar

94 Augustin, Thierry, Lettres sur l'histoire de France (Paris, 1827).Google Scholar

95 These themes were also to be found in the writings of Gautier de Sibert (see above, pp. 917–18) and the early works of Louis-Pierre Anquetil. Anquetil was pilloried by Thierry for his later Histoire de France, but Thierry followed closely and without acknowledgement his Histoire de Reims (1755) on the revolt of the communes. Cf. Barbara, Whitehead, Bridging the centuries: Louis-Pierre Anquetil and the history of France (Ph.D. dissertation, Bryn Mawr College, 1992), pp. 3–4, 95–105.Google Scholar

96 Guizot, , Histoire des origines du gouvernement représentatif 1, 17, 85.Google Scholar

97 Alexis de, Tocqueville, The state of society in France before the revolution of 1789 [L'ancien régime, 1856] (trs. Henry, Reeve, London, 1888), p. 11.Google Scholar