Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T04:36:43.767Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

MODERNISM, THE ENGLISH PAST, AND CHRISTIANITY: HERBERT BUTTERFIELD AND THE STUDY OF HISTORY

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2008

JULIA STAPLETON
JULIA STAPLETON
Affiliation:
DURHAM UNIVERSITY
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review Article
Information
The Historical Journal , Volume 51 , Issue 2 , June 2008 , pp. 547 - 557
Copyright
Copyright © 2008 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Smith, R. B., ‘R. G. Collingwood's definition of historical knowledge’, History of European Ideas, 33 (2007), pp. 362–3Google Scholar.

2 P. B. M. Blaas, Continuity and anachronism: parliamentary and constitutional development in whig historiography and in the anti-whig reaction between 1890 and 1930 (The Hague, 1978); J. W. Burrow, A Liberal descent: Victorian historians and the English past (Cambridge, 1981); R. Jann, The art and science of Victorian history (Columbus, OH, 1985).

3 Murray to Zimmern, 23 Mar. 1944, MS Zimmern 48 (27), Bodleian Library; J. Stapleton, ‘The Classicist as liberal intellectual: Gilbert Murray and Alfred Eckhard Zimmern’, in C. Stray, ed., Gilbert Murray reassessed (Oxford, 2007), pp. 261–92.

4 C. Binfield, So down to prayers: studies in English nonconformity, 1780–1920 (London, 1977), pp. 24, 26–7, 207.

5 Stapleton, J., ‘Ernest Barker: classics, England-Britain, and Europe, 1906–1960’, Polis, 23 (2006), p. 214.Google Scholar

6 See his review of Arthur Bryant's The age of elegance, 1812–1822 (London, 1950), in [Anon.], ‘Portrait of an age’, Times Literary Supplement, 17 Nov. 1950, p. 726; although Bryant was effusive in his praise of Butterfield's History and human relations (1951) in Sunday Times. See McIntyre, p. 209.

7 On receiving a copy of the review, Barker reinforced Butterfield's negative view of Rowse: ‘I confess that he gets on my nerves. I have admired some of his work. But the ipse behind the work – what a lot of that ipse there is!’ Barker to Butterfield, 27 July 1949, Butterfield papers, Cambridge University Library.

8 H. Butterfield, ‘The teach yourself history library’, History (Oct. 1948), pp. 193–202.

9 Illustrated London News, ‘Our notebook’, 25 Nov. 1922, p. 836.

10 Anon. [A. F. Pollard], ‘Mr. Chesterton's latter-day pamphlet’, Times Literary Supplement, 22 Nov. 1917.

11 F. M. Powicke, review of Butterfield's Christianity in History, ‘Two books about history, History (Oct. 1950), pp. 196–7.

12 Reviewing was a different matter. For example, Keith Feiling, Hugh Trevor-Roper, and D. C. Somervell reviewed an extensive range of history books for national newspapers, and on a regular basis.

13 As part of his Bibliography, McIntire gives the full list of Butterfield's failed projects and missed opportunities, including an invitation by Rowse in 1973 to contribute a political biography of an eighteenth-century figure to a popular series, ‘Men and their times’ (pp. 485–6).