Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T03:59:10.022Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Unionist Party and Social Policy 1906–1914

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 February 2009

D. J. Dutton
D. J. Dutton
Affiliation:
University of Liverpool
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

It is generally agreed that the body of legislation passed by the Liberal governments after 1905 represented a uniquely important contribution to the problems of social policy in the twentieth century. The attitude of the Unionist opposition of these years to such matters has, however, received little attention. Yet the posture taken by the Unionists was, it will be suggested, of crucial importance in the development of the party in this period, playing a major part in the determination of its electoral fortunes. An appropriate starting point for this study is the reaction of the Unionist leader, Arthur Balfour, to the electoral disaster of 1906, in which he personally had lost his parliamentary seat. ‘What is going on here’, he argued, ‘is the faint echo of the same movement which has produced massacres in St Petersburg, riots in Vienna and Socialist processions in Berlin… We are face to face (no doubt in a milder form) with the Socialist difficulties which loom so large on the Continent. Unless I am greatly mistaken, the Election of 1906 inaugurates a new era.’

Type
Articles
Information
The Historical Journal , Volume 24 , Issue 4 , December 1981 , pp. 871 - 884
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 A stimulating recent exception, Sykes, A., Tariff reform in British politics, 1903–1913 (Oxford, 1979) appeared after this paper was written. I hope to take up some of the important issues raised by Dr Sykes at a later date.Google Scholar

2 Balfour to Lord Knollys, 17 Jan. 1906, Balfour MSS (British Library) Add. MSS 49685.

3 J. A. Ramsden, ‘The organisation of the Conservative and Unionist party in Britain, 1910–1930’ (Oxford D.Phil., 1974), p. 22.

4 Cornford, J. P., ‘The transformation of Conservatism in the late nineteenth century’, Victorian Studies, VII, i, 66.Google Scholar

5 Pelling, H., Popular politics and society in late Victorian Britain (London, 1968), pp. 1–18.Google Scholar

6 Ibid. p. 13.

7 Cecil, Lord Hugh, Conservatism (London, 1912), p. 195.Google Scholar

8 Ramsden, J. A., The age of Balfour and Baldwin (London, 1978), p. 105.Google Scholar

9 Unionist rally at Nottingham, 15 Jan. 1906.

10 Winterton, Lord, Orders of the day (London, 1953), p. 4.Google Scholar

11 J. Chamberlain to A. Salvidge, 17 Feb. 1906, Salvidge, S., Salvidge of Liverpool (London, 1934), p. 71; Chamberlain to W. A. S. Hewins, 16 Feb. 1906, Hewins MSS, University of Sheffield, 49/32.Google Scholar

12 Fraser, P., Joseph Chamberlain (London, 1966), p. 311.Google Scholar

13 Webb, B., Our partnership (London, 1948), p. 331. Interestingly enough, Chamberlain himself appears to have doubted whether ‘the principles of socialism [had] made or [were] likely to make, much way with the English working classes’, Chamberlain to Lord Northcote, 14 Sept. 1907, Northcote MSS, P.R.O. 30/56.Google Scholar

14 Semmel, B., Imperialism and social reform (London, 1960), p. 26.Google Scholar

15 National Union Gleanings, Dec. 1907.

16 B. B. Gilbert, ‘David Lloyd George: land, the budget and social reform’, American Historical Review (1976), p. 1058.

17 B. Semmel, Imperialism, pp. 164–5.

18 Churchill, R. S., Lord Derby: ‘king of Lancashire’ (London, 1959), p. 147.Google Scholar

19 See, for example, Lord George Hamilton to Strachey, 23 Jan. 1910, Strachey MSS, House of Lords Record Office, S/8/4/3.

20 K. D. Brown, ‘The Trade Union Tariff Reform Association, 1904–13’, Journal of British Studies, XI, 2 (May 1970).

21 Mackail, J. W. and Wyndham, G., Life and letters of George Wyndham, 11 (London, 1924), 520.Google Scholar

22 Balfour of Burleigh to Long, 5 Dec. 1907, Balfour of Burleigh MSS, 30 (in possession of Lord Balfour of Burleigh).

23 Cecil to Balfour of Burleigh, 2 May 1910, Ibid. 37; Pembroke to Akers-Douglas, 5 Feb. 1906, Akers-Douglas MSS, Kent County Record Office, C425/11.

24 Thomas, J. A., The House of Commons, 1906–1911 (Cardiff, 1958), p. 46.Google Scholar

25 Jenkins, R., Mr. Balfour’spoodle (London, 1954), p. 7.Google Scholar

26 J. Ramsden, Balfour and Baldwin, p. 104, Organisation, pp. 181–2.

27 Clarke, P. F., Lancashire and the new liberalism (Cambridge, 1971), p. 333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

28 Butler, Lord (ed.), The Conservatives (London, 1977), pp. 239–40.Google Scholar

29 Balfour to J. S. Sandars, 26 Jan. 1906, Sandars MSS (Bodleian Library), C751/124; Balfour to Steel-Maitland, 8 Sept. 1911, Ibid. C764/21.

30 Viscount Cecil of Chelwood, All the way (London, 1949), p. 109.Google Scholar

31 St John Broderick to Selborne, 10 Nov. 1905, Selborne MSS (Bodleian Library), 2/108.

32 Page Croft to Hood, 12 Sept. 1910, Sandars MSS C761/67.

33 A. Chamberlain to Balfour, 24 Oct. 1907, Balfour MSS 49736.

34 Lord Butler (ed.), The Conservatives, p. 240.

35 Parker Smith to Balfour, 28 Jan. 1907, Balfour MSS 49859.

36 R. S. Churchill, Lord Derby, p. 44; Hewins, W. A. S., The apologia of an imperialist (London, 1929), 1, 304.Google Scholar

37 A. Chamberlain to Balfour, 24 Oct. 1907, Balfour MSS 49736.

38 Yorkshire Post, 18 March 1911; see also Lord George Hamilton to Salisbury, 2 Jan. 1911, Salisbury MSS (in possession of marquis of Salisbury), 69/3 for a criticism of Balfour's cursory and ill-considered reaction to the deliberations of the poor law commission.

39 Maxse to Bonar Law, 11 Nov. 1911, Bonar Law MSS (House of Lords Records Office), 24/3/9.

40 Peele, G. and Cook, C. (eds.), The politics of reappraisal, 1918–39 (London, 1975), p. 16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

41 Bonar Law to Salisbury, 3 May 1912, Bonar Law MSS 33/4/34.

42 Memorandum by Selborne, Sept. 1911, Selborne MSS 76/162.

43 Dicey to Strachey, 7 Jan. 1912, Strachey MSS S/5/6/2.

44 Blake, R., The unknown prime minister (London, 1955), p. 140.Google Scholar

45 W. Hewins, Apologia, pp. 302–3.

46 Bridgeman diary entry 10 Aug. 1914, in possession of Lord Bridgeman.

47 Page Croft to Bonar Law 8 Nov. 1913, Bonar Law MSS, 30/4/17. As Lord Lansdowne was warned: ‘however strongly we may endeavour to force the electors to vote on the Home Rule issue only, they will not be deterred from supporting a candidate who promises them speedy relief from a position of financial injustice, while the other candidate refuses to recognise… that they have any grievances for which any remedy can be found’. W. Hayes Fisher to Lansdowne, 16 Dec. 1913, Long MSS (Wiltshire County Record Office), 947/441.

48 The accuracy of this analysis of the party’s electoral fortunes is open to question. See Pelling, Popular politics, p. 8.

49 Amery to Deakin, 10 Jan. 1913, Amery MSS (in possession of Mr Julian Amery), D.45.

50 Z. Layton-Henry, ‘Democracy and reform in the Conservative party’, Journal of Contemporary History (1978), p. 667.

51 Cecil, Lord Hugh, Conservatism (London, 1912).Google Scholar

52 J. Ramsden, Balfour and Baldwin, p. 30.

53 Long to Blumenfeld, 7 Sept. 1910, Blumenfeld MSS (House of Lords Record Office), LONG/W5.

54 Gollin, A. M., The Observer and J. L. Garvin, 1908–14 (London, 1960), p. 326; Gwynne to Bonar Law, 4 Oct. 1912, Bonar Law MSS 27/3/7.Google Scholar

55 Garvin to Northcliffe, 4 Aug. 1909, copy Sandars MSS C759/64.

56 Salisbury to Selborne, 20 Sept. 1907, Selborne MSS 5/189.

57 Ibid. 3 Oct. 1907, Ibid. 5/195.

58 Undated memorandum by Steel-Maitland, Steel-Maitland MSS (Scottish Record Office), GD 193/108/3.

59 J. Ramsden, Balfour and Baldwin, p. 76.

60 Hills, J. W., Ashley, W. J. and Woods, M., Industrial unrest: a practical solution (London, 1914).Google Scholar

61 The Times, 16 June 1914.

62 Gleanings, July 1914.

63 Lord Winterton, Orders, p. 60.

64 Winterton, Lord, Prewar (London, 1932), p. 248; H. M. Hyndman to Blumenfeld, 5 Nov. 1913, Blumenfeld MSS HY/3.Google Scholar

65 J. Ramsden, Balfour and Baldwin, p. 77.

66 See correspondence between Long and Collings, Long MSS 947/438.

67 Long on Bonar Law, 8 Aug. 1912, Bonar Law MSS 27/1/28.

68 Undated memorandum by Steel-Maitland on the Land Question, Steel-Maitland MSS GD 193/119/5; J. F. Hope to Steel-Maitland, 1 Jan. 1914, Bonar Law MSS 31/2/3. See also complaints of E. G. Pretyman, President of the Land Union, Pretyman to Bonar Law, 28 Oct. 1913, Ibid. 30/3/64.

69 Taylor, A. J. P. (ed.), Lloyd George: twelve essays (London, 1971), p. 54.Google Scholar

70 Note by Lansdowne, 13 April 1913, Long MSS 947/439.

71 S. Baldwin, P. Lloyd-Graeme, E. Wood and others to Bonar Law, 8 Nov. 1913, Bonar Law MSS 30/4/12.

72 Gilbert, B. B., ‘David Lloyd George: the reform of British landholding and the budget of 1914’, Historical Journal, XXI, I (1978), 129; Steel-Maitland to Bonar Law and Lansdowne, 23 June 1914, Bonar Law MSS 39/4/40.Google Scholar

73 Memorandum on Land Policy by Lord Milner 1913, Curzon MSS (India Office Library), F 112/93.

74 Milner to Steel-Maitland, 29 Oct. 1913, Steel-Maitland MSS GD 193/119/5.

75 W. L. Arnstein, ‘Edwardian politics: turbulent spring or Indian summer?’ in O’Day, A. (ed.), The Edwardian age (London, 1979), p. 78.Google Scholar

76 P. F. Clarke, Lancashire, pp. 403–4.

77 Fortescue Flannery to Bonar Law, 2 April 1914, Bonar Law MSS 32/2/5.

78 Undated memorandum on ‘the necessity, the method and the limits of social reform’, Steel-Maitland MSS GD 193/80/5.