Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T04:04:15.871Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Political Autobiography and the Art of the Plausible: R. A. Butler at the Foreign Office, 1938–1939

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 February 2009

Paul Stafford
Affiliation:
Christ Church, Oxford

Extract

R. A. Butler has been one of the outstanding figures in twentieth-century British politics. After his death The Times described him as ‘the creator of the modern educational system, the key-figure in the revival of post-war Conservatism, arguably the most successful chancellor since the war and un-questionably a Home Secretary of reforming zeal’. His record of achievement was unequalled by his rivals in the contests for the party leadership in 1957 and in 1963, but on both occasions the leadership eluded him. How and why this happened was understandably of the greatest interest to those who reviewed Rab's memoirs, The art of the possible, which were published in 1971. These memoirs won unanimous praise for their literary excellence, but otherwise met with a rather mixed reception. Enoch Powell, one of Rab's supporters in 1963, described them as ‘a work of astonishing self-revelation [belonging] with the classic Confessions. Augustine and Rousseau were not more unsparing of themselves than Rab…’ The ‘large episodes’ of Rab's career, Powell went on, ‘are treated with a generous vision (including, it need not be added, a generosity to Rab) which leaves the reader with improved understanding and perspective’. Powell's comments were echoed by others on the Right, but the Left was more critical. Anthony Howard noted that ‘what tend…to get wholly left out are the mistakes and blunders’ – the now infamous Villacoublay meeting during the Suez crisis; and Rab's astonishing admission to the journalist George Gale during the 1964 campaign that the election was slipping Labour's way. Harold Wilson, who had offered Rab the mastership of Trinity, was perhaps the least charitable of all. He found The art of the possible disappointing because, he claimed, Rab underwrote the great occasions. Rab's reticence about Suez, however, upset Wilson less than the description of his tribulations at the hands of Labour MPs as government spokesman for the policy of non-intervention during the Spanish Civil War. Here was an issue which could excite the older soldiers of the British Left, and if Wilson was alone among Rab's reviewers in making more than passing reference to Rab's association with appeasement this was why.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 The Times (10 Mar. 1982), p. 14.

2 Powell, Enoch, ‘R.A.B., the greatest of the might-have-beens’, Daily Telegraph (12 07 1971), p. 12Google Scholar.

3 Howard, Anthony, ‘Losing the game’, New Statesman (16 07 1971), pp. 83–4Google Scholar.

4 The Spectator (17 July 1971), pp. 97–9.

5 Ramsden, John, ‘From Churchill to Heath’ in The Conservatives: a history from their origins to 1965, ed. Butler, Lord (London, 1977), p. 443Google Scholar.

6 The art of the possible, p. 85.

7 Ibid. p. 78.

8 Ibid. p. 74.

9 Butler, Lord, The art of memory (London, 1982), p. 38Google Scholar.

10 The art of the possible, p. 75.

11 Ibid. p. 66.

12 Ibid. p. 73.

13 Ibid. pp. 73, 77.

14 Ibid. p. 77.

15 Ibid. p. 79.

16 The art of memory, pp. 46–7.

17 The art of the possible, p. 76.

18 The art of memory, p. 53.

19 Documents on German foreign policy, 1918–1945 (1949–), Series D, I, 128.

20 With invitations to the Fellowship's social gatherings and to speak at its lectures, Nazis could explain the regime's point of view to the influential body of parliamentarians, publicists and businessmen who formed the Fellowship's membership. See Griffiths, Richard, Fellow travellers of the Right (Oxford, 1983), pp. 183–5Google Scholar.

21 Public Record Office, Morton to Nicholls, 17 Feb. 1938, C 1212/18, FO 371 21674. Foreign Office papers quoted in subsequent references are also from the Public Record Office.

22 Lees-Milne, James, Ancestral voices (London, 1975), p. 69Google Scholar.

23 Memorandum of Brocket's visit to Germany, 13–17 Feb. 1939, enclosed in Brocket to Halifax, I Mar. 1939, C 2575/15/18, FO 371/22966.

24 Brocket to Halifax, 27 Mar. 1939, FO 800/315.

25 Ibid.; Brocket to Halifax, 2 Apr., 7 June 1939, FO 800/315.

26 Ogilvie-Forbes to Halifax, 17 Apr., Brocket's memorandum for Halifax on his visit to Berlin, 16–22 Apr. 1939, FO 800/315; The Times (19 Apr. 1939), p. 14.

27 Brocket to Halifax, 7 June 1939, FO 800/315.

28 Hoare to Cadogan, 26 June, Brocket to Halifax, 29 June 1939, FO 800/315; Conwell-Evans to Halifax, 12 July, Brocket to Halifax, 16 July, minute by Halifax, 19 July 1939, FO 800/316.

29 Trinity College, Cambridge, Butler papers, Brocket to Butler, 25 June, 28 July 1939, G 10/48–49.

30 In a speech at Salisbury on 5 Mar. 1938. The Times (7 Mar. 1938), p. 21.

31 Dilks, David (ed.), The diaries of Sir Alexander Cadogan, 1938–1945 (1971) PP. 63–4Google Scholar.

32 James, Robert Rhodes (ed.), Chips: The diaries of Sir Henry Chatmon (1967), p. 167Google Scholar.

33 Butler papers, rule 3 of ‘The Parlour’ handbook, G 9/115.

34 Butler papers, Butler to Wilson, 3 Dec. 1938 G 9/120; Simon to Butler, 13 Dec. 1938, G 9/126.

35 Butler papers, ‘“The Parlour” November 30 1938’, G 9/120–22.

36 Cadogan diaries, p. 152.

37 Butler papers, Butler, to Brabourne, , 17 02 1939, G 10/7985Google Scholar.

38 Documents on British foreign policy 1919–1939 (1949), IV, Appendix I (iii), (iv).

39 Newman, Simon, March 1939: the British guarantee to Poland (Oxford, 1976), p. 100Google Scholar; House of Commons, Debates, 5th series, vol. 345, column 440.

40 Channon diaries, p. 191.

41 Notes by Butler, dated (later) by him ‘about June 1939’. These notes are typed and bear corrections and additions made after the Nazi-Soviet Pact. Butler papers, G 10/26–31.

42 Channon diaries, p. 192.

43 Ibid. p. 193.

44 Ibid. p. 193.

45 Public Record Office, Cabinet conclusions, 18 Mar. 1939, CAB 23/98.

46 Aster, Sidney, 1939: The making of the Second World War (1973), pp. 218–19Google Scholar.

47 Harvey, John (ed.), The diplomatic diaries of Oliver Harvey 1937–1940 (1970), p. 285Google Scholar.

48 Butler papers, F 81/83–4, 93.

49 Channon diaries, pp. 195–6.

50 Cadogan diaries, p. 178.

51 Harvey diaries, p. 286.

52 Channon diaries, p. 199.

53 Birmingham University Library, Neville Chamberlain papers, Neville to Hilda Chamberlain, 28 May 1939, NC 18/1/1101.

54 See the excellent analysis in Aster, , 1939, pp. 243–59Google Scholar.

55 Butler to Halifax, 13 June 1939, FO 800/315.

56 Butler papers, minute by Butler for Halifax, 29 June 1939, G 10/86–8.

57 Memorandum by Butler, 17 July 1939, FO 800/316.

58 Cadogan diaries, p. 190.

59 Aster, , 1939 p. 253Google Scholar; Tennant, Ernest, True account (London, 1957), pp. 216–26Google Scholar.

60 Aster, , 1939, pp. 245–55Google Scholar.

61 Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the USSR, Documents and materials relating to the eve of the Second World War, 2 vols (Moscow, 1948), 11, 20Google Scholar.

62 Aster, , 1939, pp. 255–8Google Scholar.

63 Butler papers, Note by Butler, ‘September 1939’, G 10–110–11.

64 Weinberg, G. L., The foreign policy of Hitler's Germany, II, Starting World War Two 1937–1939 (Chicago, 1980), 636–7Google Scholar.

65 Butler papers, G 10/94–5.

66 Cadogan diaries, p. 202.

67 Channon diaries, pp. 211–14.

68 Ibid. p. 217.

69 I should like to thank Mrs Ernest Tennant for her prompt and helpful replies to inquiries about her husband, and Miss Rosemary Graham of Trinity College, Cambridge, for her assistance with the Butler papers. I also benefited from discussion with Mr Anthony Howard, who is currently writing Rab's biography.