Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T05:18:34.602Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Press and the Suez Crisis: A Myth Re-Examined

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 February 2009

Ralph Negrine
Ralph Negrine
Affiliation:
City of London Polytechnic
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Communications
Information
The Historical Journal , Volume 25 , Issue 4 , December 1982 , pp. 975 - 983
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Parmentier, G., ‘The British press in the Suez crisis’, Historical Journal, xxiii, 2 (1980), 435–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

2 Ibid. p. 435.

3 Ibid. p. 438.

4 Ibid. p. 435.

5 Ibid. p. 436.

6 Ibid. p. 438.

7 Ibid. p. 438.

8 King, C., Strictly personal (London, 1969)Google Scholar. Also Hirsch, P. and Gordon, F., Newspaper money (London, 1975)Google Scholar; Edelman, M., The Daily Mirror: A political history (London, 1966)Google Scholar; Westergaard, J. and Resler, H., Class in a capitalist society (London, 1977), p. 269. See below for fuller references.Google Scholar

9 King, Strictly personal, p. 131.

10 Parmentier, ‘British press’, p. 436.

11 Parmentier, ‘British press’, p. 438.

12 The Observer, 5 Aug. 1956. Dates of newspapers henceforth refer to 1956.

13 The Observer, 5 Aug.

14 The Manchester Guardian, 14 Aug.

15 The New Statesman, 18 Aug.

16 F. Williams, ‘Fleet Street notebook’, The New Statesman, 25 Aug.

17 The Manchester Guardian, quoted in Williams, The New Statesman, 8 Aug.

18 F. Williams, The New Statesman, 8 Sept.

19 The Sunday Times, 9 Sept.

20 The Daily Mirror, 12 Sept.

21 The Daily Mirror, 12 Sept. and The New Statesman, 15 Sept. See also Owen, J., Public Opinion Quarterly, xxi (1957).Google Scholar

22 The Sunday Times, 4 Nov.

23 Parmentier, ‘British press’, p. 447 n.

24 Edelman, M., The Daily Mirror: a political history (London, 1966), p. 159.Google Scholar

25 Cudlipp, H., At your peril (London, 1962), p. 112.Google Scholar

26 Seymour-Ure, C. K., The press, politics and the public (London, 1968), p. 57.Google Scholar

27 Hirsch and Gordon, Newspaper money, p. 21.

28 Ibid.

29 The Observer, 18 Nov.

30 The Observer, 25 Nov.

31 The Manchester Guardian, 18 Aug.

32 The Sunday Times, 11 Nov.

33 C. King, personal communication to the author, autumn 1979.

34 Hobson, H., Knightley, P. and Russell, L., The pearl of days: an intimate memoir of The Sunday Times (London, 1972), p. 296.Google Scholar

35 Grundy, B., Inside the press (London, 1976), p. 52.Google Scholar

36 David Astor, personal communication, summer 1979. My emphasis.

37 David Astor, personal communication, summer 1979.

38 Martin, G., ‘The press’, in Thompson, D. (ed.), Discrimination and popular culture (London, 1973), p. 90.Google Scholar