Published online by Cambridge University Press: 24 February 2017
The social reconstructionist educators within the progressive education movement were only one of the many groups to emerge in response to the depression of the thirties with the promise that their plan would regenerate society. Compared to Upton Sinclair's “End Poverty in California” program, the Minnesota Farmer-Labor Party and the large followings of Huey Long, Father Coughlin and Francis Townsend, their movement seemed insignificant indeed. Yet they were taken seriously by political groups on both the Left and the Right. This was in marked contrast to the large body of classroom teachers, who remained indifferent to the Promethean role they were being called upon to perform. The extreme Left was forced to consider the social reconstructionists because the revolutionary role they assigned to the school represented a direct challenge to the orthodox Marxist position. Conservative groups responded to the program of the social reconstructionists out of fear that the minds of the young were being filled with un-American ideas and values. While the latter created a louder clamor, it was the Communists who were most deeply affected by social reconstructionism.
1. This group included, among others, Counts, George S., Kilpatrick, William H., Rugg, Harold, Bruce Raup, R., Childs, John L., Dewey, John and Watson, Goodwin.Google Scholar
2. Communist Party of the United States of America, The Way Out: A Program for American Labor (New York: Workers Library, Publishers, 1934), p. 13.Google Scholar
3. Progressive Education Association's Committee on Social-Economic Problems, A Call to the Teachers of the Nation, p. 19.Google Scholar
4. Browder, Earl, “Education-An Ally in the Workers' Struggle,” Social Frontier, I, No. 4 (January 1935), 23.Google Scholar
5. Ibid.Google Scholar
6. Ibid., p. 24.Google Scholar
7. Ibid.Google Scholar
8. Langford, Howard D., Education and the Social Crisis (New York: The Macmillan Company, 1936), p. x.Google Scholar
9. Ibid., pp. xviii-xix.Google Scholar
10. Ibid., p. 14.Google Scholar
11. Ibid., p. 84.Google Scholar
12. Ibid., p. 94.Google Scholar
13. Ibid., pp. 96-97.Google Scholar
14. Ibid., p. 124.Google Scholar
15. Ibid., p. 123.Google Scholar
16. Ibid., p. 148.Google Scholar
17. Ibid., p. 149.Google Scholar
18. Ibid., p. 150.Google Scholar
19. Ibid., p. 191.Google Scholar
20. Slesinger, Zalman, Education and the Class Struggle (New York: Covici-Friede, Publishers, 1937), p. 5.Google Scholar
21. Ibid., p. 259.Google Scholar
22. Ibid., p. 293.Google Scholar
23. Ibid., p. 294.Google Scholar
24. Frank, Richard, “The Schools and the People's Front,” The Communist, XVI, No. 5 (May 1937), 432.Google Scholar
25. Ibid., p. 433.Google Scholar
26. Ibid., p. 435.Google Scholar
27. Ibid., p. 437.Google Scholar
28. Ibid., p. 441.Google Scholar
29. Dilling, Elizabeth, The Red Network: A Who's Who and Handbook of Radicalism for Patriots (Milwaukee: C. N. Casper Company, 1934), pp. 216–17.Google Scholar
30. Steele, Walter S., “School Reds and Immortality,” National Republic, XXIII (September 1935), 31.Google Scholar
31. Ibid., “Education and Revolutions,” National Republic, XXIII (April 1936), 15-16.Google Scholar
32. Summary of the Proceedings of the First National Convention of the American Legion (Minneapolis, 1919), p. 39.Google Scholar
33. “The American Legion and the Alleged Teaching of Communism,” School and Society, 40 (September 1934), 273–74.Google Scholar
34. LeRoy Baldridge, Cyrus, Americanism: What Is It? (New York: Farrar and Rinehart, Inc., 1936).Google Scholar
35. Gellermann, William, The American Legion as Educator (New York: Teachers College, Columbia University, 1938), p. 77.Google Scholar
36. Kyne, Peter B., “That Boy Belgrano,” The American Legion Monthly, 18 (January 1935), 15.Google Scholar
37. Belgrano, Frank N. Jr., “The Legion Way is the American Way” The American Legion Monthly, 18 (February 1935), 16.Google Scholar
38. Ibid., pp. 17 and 67.Google Scholar
39. Armstrong, O. K., “Treason in the Textbooks,” The American Legion Monthly, 29 (September 1940), 8.Google Scholar
40. Ibid.Google Scholar
41. Ibid., p. 51.Google Scholar
42. “Editorial: The Battle of the Books,” The American Legion Monthly, 29 (November 1940), 68.Google Scholar
43. Ibid.Google Scholar
44. Worth Shumaker, R., “No ‘New Order’ for Our Schools,” American Legion, 30 (April 1941), 6.Google Scholar
45. The New York Times, April 19, 1941, p. 4.Google Scholar
46. Gilbert, Dan W., “Un-Americanism in Textbooks,” National Republic, XXIX (January 1942), 31.Google Scholar
47. Ibid.Google Scholar
48. Rudd, Augustin J., “Education for ‘New Social Order,’” National Republic, XXX (May 1942), 20 and 30.Google Scholar
49. Rugg, Harold, That Men May Understand (New York: Doubleday, Doran and Company, Inc., 1941), p. 48.Google Scholar
50. Cleveland Press, April 1940.Google Scholar
51. Binghamton Herald, December 13, 1939.Google Scholar
52. Quoted in Myers, Alonzo F., “The Attacks on the Rugg Books,” Frontiers of Democracy, 7 (October 1940), 21.Google Scholar
53. Ibid., p. 19.Google Scholar
54. Rugg, Harold, That Men May Understand p. 17.Google Scholar
55. Childs, John L., Education and Morals (New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, Inc., 1950), p. 271.Google Scholar
56. Counts, G. S., Education and the Promise of America (New York: The Macmillan Company, 1945), pp. 78–79.Google Scholar
57. Longacre, C. S., “Communism in Public Schools,” Liberty, 36, No. 2 (1941), 32.Google Scholar
58. Worth Shumaker, R., “Not to Collectivism,” American Legion, 35 (September 1943), 22.Google Scholar