Published online by Cambridge University Press: 24 February 2017
General histories of the Progressive Era have by and large ignored educational reform even though it was an integral part of the Progressive Movement. Lawrence Cremin, who has done much to remedy this oversight, has described Progressivism in education as “a many-sided effort to use the schools to improve the lives of individuals.” To the Progressives, according to Cremin, this meant “broadening the program and the function of the school to include direct concern for health, vocation, and the quality of family and community life … applying in the classroom the pedagogical principles derived from new scientific research in psychology and the social sciences … [and] tailoring instruction more and more to the different kinds and classes of children who were being brought within the purview of the school.”
1. Cremin, Lawrence A. The Transformation of the School, Progressivism in American Education, 1876-1957 (New York: Vintage Books, A Division of Random House, 1961), p. viii. For a study of educational reform in New York City, see Sol Cohen, Progressives and Urban School Reform, The Public Education Association of New York City (New York: Teachers College, Columbia University, 1964).Google Scholar
2. Cremin, op. cit., p. 169.Google Scholar
3. Smith, Timothy L. “Progressivism in American Education, 1880-1900,” Harvard Educational Review, XXXI (Spring 1961), 168–93.Google Scholar
4. Pittsburgh Teachers Association, A Review of Teachers’ Salary Conditions in Pittsburgh, 1869-1906 (Pittsburgh: Pittsburgh Teachers Association, 1906), p. 2. This work (hereafter cited as Review) was invaluable, for it contained the documents of the salary campaign. See also Clarissa A. Moffitt, “Sketch of the Pittsburgh Teachers Association,” Pittsburgh School Bulletin, IV (March 1911), 11-14. Pittsburgh School Bulletin will hereafter be cited as PSB. Google Scholar
5. Review, p. 2; also City of Pittsburgh, Reports Concerning the Public Schools (1905-1906), pp. 10-16. (Hereafter cited as Reports.)Google Scholar
6. Review, p. 10.Google Scholar
7. Ibid. Google Scholar
8. Ibid., pp. 10-16.Google Scholar
9. Ibid., pp. 17-22; also Clarissa Moffit, op. cit., p. 11.Google Scholar
10. The campaign for a retirement fund was described in PSB, I (June 1907), 4-6.Google Scholar
11. Ibid., p. 1.Google Scholar
12. PSB, II (April 1909), back cover.Google Scholar
13. PSB, I (June 1907), 1.Google Scholar
14. Ibid., pp. 1-2.Google Scholar
15. PSB, I (September 1907), 2.Google Scholar
16. Ibid., p. 3.Google Scholar
17. Ibid., p. 4.Google Scholar
18. PSB, I (January 1908), 4.Google Scholar
19. PSB, II (November 1908), 3-4.Google Scholar
20. PSB, I (February 1908), 1-2.Google Scholar
21. Ibid., pp. 5-10.Google Scholar
22. PSB, I (March 1908), 5.Google Scholar
23. PSB, I (May 1908), 4-9.Google Scholar
24. PSB, I (June 1908), 2-3.Google Scholar
25. PSB, III (December 1909), 3.Google Scholar
26. PSB, IV (December 1910), 7.Google Scholar
27. PSB, III (March 1910), 12-14.Google Scholar
28. PSB, III (May 1910), 24.Google Scholar
29. Ibid., p. 25.Google Scholar
30. PSB, IV (March 1911), 2.Google Scholar
31. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, General Assembly, Legislative Record, 1907, p. 2475.Google Scholar
32. PSB, I (May 1908), 17-18; also V (November 1911), 3.Google Scholar
33. PSB, V (November 1911), 3.Google Scholar
34. Ibid., pp. 3-5.Google Scholar
35. PSB, IV (June 1911), 2.Google Scholar
36. Ibid., p. 5.Google Scholar
37. Ibid. Google Scholar
38. Ibid., p. 4.Google Scholar
39. Ibid., p. 10.Google Scholar
40. Ibid., PP. 11, 12; Ibid., p. 23.Google Scholar
41. Pittsburgh Board of Public Education, First Annual Report, School District of Pittsburgh, for the year ending December 31, 1912, pp. 2-8.Google Scholar
42. Hays, Samuel P. “The Politics of Reform in Municipal Government in the Progressive Era,” Pacific Northwest Quarterly, LV (October 1964), 157–69.Google Scholar