Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T07:18:15.441Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Being Dismissed: The Politics of Emotional Expression

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 March 2020

Sue Campbell
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

My intent is to bring a key group of critical terms associated with the emotions—bitterness, sentimentality, and emotionality—to greater feminist attention. These terms are used to characterize emoters on the basis of how we express ourselves, and they characterize us in ways that we need no longer be taken seriously. I analyze the ways in which these terms of emotional dismissal can be put to powerful political use.

Type
Research Article
Information
Hypatia , Volume 9 , Issue 3 , Summer 1994 , pp. 46 - 65
Copyright
Copyright © 1994 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alcott, Louisa May. 1968. Little women or Mego, Beth, and Amy. Boston: Little Brown and Co.Google Scholar
Bartky, Sandra. 1990. Shame and gender. In Femininity and domination: Studies in the phenomenology of oppression. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Campbell, Sue. 1987. The Aristotelian mean and the vices of gender. Eidos 6(2): 177–200.Google Scholar
Campbell, Sue. 1992. Expression and the individuation of feeling. Doctoral dissertation. University of Toronto.Google Scholar
Dickey, James. 1978. Review of To bedlam and part way back. In Anne Sexton: The poet and her critics, ed.McClatchy, J.D.Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Frye, Marilyn. 1983. A note on anger. In The politics of reality: Essays in feminist theory. Trumansburg, N.Y.: The Crossing Press.Google Scholar
Jaggar, Alison. 1989. Love and knowledge: Emotion in feminist epistemology. Inquiry 32:151–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, William. 1950. The principles of psychology, 2 vols. New York: Dover.Google Scholar
Jefferson, Mark. 1983. What is wrong with sentimentality? Mind 92: 519–529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. 1983. Of the distinction of the beautiful and sublime in the interrelations of the two sexes. In Observations on the feeling of the beautiful and the sublime. Excerpted in Mahowald.Google Scholar
LaRoque, Emma. 1990. Prefaceto Writing the circle, ed.Perreault, Jeanne and Vance, Silvia. Edmonton: NeWest Publishers.Google Scholar
Lorde, Audre. 1984a. The uses of anger: Women responding to racism. In Sister outsider. Trumansburg, NY: The Crossing Press.Google Scholar
Lorde, Audre. 1984b. Eye to eye: Black women, hatred, and anger. In Audre Lorde, Sister outsider. Trumansburg, NY: The Crossing Press.Google Scholar
Mahowald, Mary, ed. 1983. Philosophy of women. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing.Google Scholar
McFall, Lynne. 1991. What's wrong with bitterness? In Feminist ethics, ed.Card, Claudia. Lawrence: University of Kansas Press.Google Scholar
Midgley, Mary. 1979. Brutality and sentimentality. Philosophy 54: 385–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rorty, Amelie. 1980. Introduction to Explaining emotions, ed.Rorty, Amelie. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Scheman, Naomi. 1980. Anger and the politics of naming. In Women and language in literature and society, ed.McConnell Ginet, Sally, Borker, Ruth and Foreman, Nelly. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Solomon, Robert. 1990. In defense of sentimentality. Philosophy and Literature 14: 304–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spelman, Elizabeth. 1989. Anger and insubordination. In Women, knowledge and reality, ed.Garry, Ann and Pearsall, Marilyn. Boston: Unwin Hyman.Google Scholar
Tanner, Michael. 1976-77. Sentimentality. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 77: 125–47.Google Scholar
Thorp, William, ed. 1968. Great short works of the American renaissance. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar