Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T10:15:35.607Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Combat Exclusion and the Role of Women in the Military

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2020

Judith Wagner Decew
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

I first discuss reasons for feminists to attend to the role of women in the military, despite past emphasis on antimilitarism. I then focus on the exclusion of women from combat duty, reviewing its sanction by the U.S. Supreme Court and the history of its adoption. I present arguments favoring the exclusion, defending strong replies to each, and demonstrate that reasoning from related cases and feminist analyses of equality explain why exclusion remains entrenched.

Type
Research Article
Information
Hypatia , Volume 10 , Issue 1: Special Issue: Feminist Ethics and Social Policy, Part 1 , Winter 1995 , pp. 56 - 73
Copyright
Copyright © 1995 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

D'Amico, Francine. 1990. Women at arms: The combat controversy. Minerva: Quarterly Report on Women and the Military 8(2): 1–35.Google Scholar
Elshtain, Jean Bethke and Tobias, Sheila. 1990. Women, militarism, and war: Essays in history, politics, and social history. Lanhan, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Enloe, Cynthia. 1983. Does khaki become you? The militarization of women's lives. Boston: South End Press.Google Scholar
Gordon, Marilyn A. and Ludvigson, Mary Jo. 1991. A constitutional analysis of the combat exclusion for air force women. Minerva: Quarterly Report on Women and the Military 9(2): 1–34. First published in different form in U.S. Air Force Journal of Legal Studies 1(1990), and The Naval Law Review 1(1990).Google Scholar
Harris, Adrienne and King, Ynestra eds., 1989. Rocking the ship of state. Boulder, CO: Westview.Google Scholar
Hartsock, Nancy. 1989. Masculinity, heroism, and the making of war. In Rocking the ship of state. See Harris and King 1989.Google Scholar
Held, Virginia. 1993. Feminist morality. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Katzenstein, Mary Fainsod. 1993. The right to fight. The Women's Review of Books 11(2): 30–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Catharine, MacKinnon. 1989. Toward a feminist theory of the state. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Minnow, Martha. 1991. Equalities. The Journal of Philosophy 88(11): 635–644.Google Scholar
Mitchell, B. 1989. Weak link: Feminization of the American military. Washington, DC: Regnery Gateway.Google Scholar
Muir, Kate. 1993. Arms and the woman. London: Hodder and Stroughton.Google Scholar
Reardon, Betty. 1985. Sexism and the war system. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
Ruddick, Sara. 1980. Maternal thinking. Feminist Studies 6: 342–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stiehm, Judith. 1983. The protected, the protector, the defender. In Women's and men's wars. New York: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Stiehm, Judith Hicks. 1989. Arms and the enlisted woman. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Swerdlow, Amy. 1989. Pure milk, not poison: Women strike for peace and the test ban treaty of 1963. In Rocking the ship of state. See Harris and King 1989.Google Scholar
The combat exclusion laws: An idea whose time has gone. 1991. The Association of the Bar of the City of New York Committee on Military Affairs and Justice. Minerva: Quarterly Report on Women and the Military 9(4): 1–55.Google Scholar
Tuten, Jeff M. 1982. The argument against female combatants. In Female soldiers‐combatants or noncombatants: Historical and contemporary perspectives, ed. Goldman, Nancy Loring. Westport, CT: Greenwood.Google Scholar
Williams, Bernard. 1981. What is equality? Pt. 1 of Equality of welfare. Philosophy and Public Affairs 10(3): 185–224.Google Scholar
Yarborough, J. 1985. Sex and the military: The feminist mistake. Current, 27–32.Google Scholar