Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T09:52:50.408Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A European Initiative: Irigaray, Marx, and Citizenship

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2020

Alison Martin
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article presents Irigaray as a philosopher committed to sociopolitical change by discussing her political thought and her engagement with the European Parliament. It traces her recent work with the ex-Communist Party in Italy back to her early critique of Marx and her subsequent attraction to Hegel's civil definition of the person. The failure of her European Parliament initiative suggests that her thinking is in advance of its possible realization.

Type
Research Article
Information
Hypatia , Volume 19 , Issue 3 , Summer 2004 , pp. 20 - 37
Copyright
Copyright © 2004 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arendt, Hannah. 1977. Between past and future. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
de Beauvoir, Simone. 1954. The second sex. Trans. Parshley, H. M.New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
Cavarero, Adriana. 1995. In spite of Plato: A feminist rewriting of ancient philosophy. Trans. Anderlini‐D'Onofrio, Serena and O'Healy, Aine. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Deleuze, Gilles, and Guattari, Felix. 1972. Capitalisme et schizophrénie, vol. 1, L'antiædipe. Paris: Minuit.Google Scholar
Deutscher, Penelope. 2002. A politics of impossible difference: The later work of Luce Irigaray. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Deutscher, Penelope. 2003. Between east and west and the politics of “cultural ingénuité”: Irigaray on cultural difference. Theory, Culture and Society 20 (3) 65–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engels, Frederick. 1971. The origin of the family, private property and the state. New York: International Publishers.Google Scholar
Goux, Jean‐Joseph. 1973. Économic et symbolique: Freud, Marx. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
Goux, Jean‐Joseph. 1994. Luce Irigaray versus the utopia of the neutral sex. In Engaging with Irigaray, ed. Burke, Carolyn, Schor, Naomi, and Whitford, Margaret. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Hegel, G.W.F. 1942. Philosophy of right. Trans. Knox, T. M.Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martín. 1975. Poetry, language, thought. Trans. Hofstadter, Albert. New York: Harper 6k Row.Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martín. 1980. Being and time. Trans. Macquarrie, John and Robinson, Edward. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Irigaray, Luce. 1981. Le corps‐à‐corps avec la mère. Ottowa: Les éditions de la pleine lune.Google Scholar
Irigaray, Luce. 1985a. Speculum of the other woman. Trans. Gill, Gillian C.Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Irigaray, Luce. 1985b. This sex which is not one. Trans. Porter, Catherine. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Irigaray, Luce. 1987. “Égales àqui?” Critique, May (480): 420–37.Google Scholar
Irigaray, Luce. 1990. Une attention au souffle dans la vie, la pensée, I'amour. Paris: Irigaray.Google Scholar
Irigaray, Luce. 1993a. An ethics of sexual difference. Trans. Burke, Carolyn and Gill, Gillian C.London: Athlone Press.Google Scholar
Irigaray, Luce. 1993b. Je, tu, nous: Toward a culture of difference. Trans. Martín, Alison. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Irigaray, Luce. 1996. I love to you. Trans. Martín, Alison. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Irigaray, Luce. 2000. Democracy begins between two. Trans. Anderson, Kirsteen. London: Athlone Press.Google Scholar
Irigaray, Luce. 2001. To be two. Trans. Rhodes, Monique M. and Cocito‐Monoc, Marco F.New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Irigaray, Luce. 2002. Between east and west: From singularity to community. Trans. Pluhácek, Stephen. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Irigaray, Luce. 2003. The way of love. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Jagose, Annamarie. 1994. Lesbian utopics. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lyotard, Jean‐François. 1974. Economic libidinale. Paris: Minuit.Google Scholar
Martín, Alison. 2000. Luce Irigaray and the question of the divine. Leeds: Maney Publishing for the MHRA.Google Scholar
Marx, Karl. 1970. Capital. Vol. 1. Trans. Moore, S. and Aveling, E.London: Lawrence & Wishart.Google Scholar
Marx, Karl. 1972. Early texts. Trans. and ed. McLellan, David. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Plant, Raymond. 1991. Social rights and the reconstruction of welfare. In Citizenship, ed. Andrews, Geoff. London: Lawrence and Wishart.Google Scholar
Plaza, Monique. 1978. “Phallomorphic power” and the psychology of “woman.” 32 4: 4–36.Google Scholar
Stetson, Dorothy McBride. 1987. Women's rights in France. New York and London: Greenwood.Google Scholar