Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T12:06:05.142Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Morality of Feminism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 March 2020

Selma L. Sevenhuijsen
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Inaugural lecture as Professor of Women's Studies in the Social Science Faculty at the University of Utrecht.

Type
Archive
Information
Hypatia , Volume 6 , Issue 2 , Summer 1991 , pp. 173 - 191
Copyright
Copyright © 1991 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ainley, A. 1990. The ethics of sexual difference. In Abjection, melancholia and love. The work of Julia Kristeva. Fletcher, J. and Benjamin, A. eds. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Alcoff, Linda. 1988. Cultural feminism versus post‐structuralism: The identity crisis in feminist theory. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 13(3): 405–36.10.1086/494426CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Almond, Brenda. 1988. Women's right: Reflections on ethics and gender. In Feminist perspectives in philosophy. Griffiths, Morwenna and Whitford, Margaret, eds. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press; Houndsmill: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Arnault, L. S. 1989. The radical future of a classical moral theory. In Gender/body/knowledge: Feminist reconstructions of being and knowing. Jaggar, Alison and Bordo, Susan R., eds. New Brunswick, NJ and London: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
Assiter, Alison. 1988. Autonomy and pornography. In Feminist perspectives in philosophy. Griffiths, Morwenna and Whitford, Margaret, eds. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press; Houndsmill: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Baier, Annette C. 1987. Hume, the women's moral theorist? In Eva Feder Kittay and Diana T. Meyers, Women and moral theory. Totowa, N.J.: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Baier, Annette C. 1989. Trust and antitrust. Ethics 96: 231–60.Google Scholar
Benhabib, Seyla. 1987. The generalized and the concrete other: The Kohlberg‐Gilligan controversy and feminist theory. In Feminism as critique. Essays on the politics of gender in late‐capitalist societies. Benhabib, Seyla and Cornell, Drucilla, eds. Oxford: Polity Press; Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Bosch, M. 1988. Een vrouwenhegemonie in Baarn. Professor dr. Johanna Westerdijk, directrice van het Laboratorium Willie Commelin Scholten. In Geleerde vrouwen. Neqende jaarboek voor vrouwengeschiedenis. Van Loosbroek, T.et al., eds. Nijmegen: SUN.Google Scholar
Braidotti, Rosi. 1989. The politics of ontological difference. In Between feminism and psychoanalysis. Brennan, T., ed. New York: Routledge; Oxford: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Clark, Lorene M. G., and Lange, Lynda. 1979. The sexism of social and political theory: Women and reproduction from Plato to Nietzsche. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Code, Lorraine. 1987. Epistemic responsibility. Hanover, N.H.: University Press of New England/Brown University Press.Google Scholar
Code, Lorraine. 1988a. Experience, knowledge and responsibility. In Feminist perspectives in philosophy. Griffiths, Morwenna and Whitford, Margaret, eds. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press; Houndsmill: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Code, Lorraine. 1988b. Credibility: a double standard. In Feminist perspectives. Philosophical essays on method and morals. Code, Lorraineet al, eds. Toronto: Toronto University Press.Google Scholar
Code, Lorraine et al, eds. 1988. Feminist perspectives: Philosophical essays on method and morals. Toronto: Toronto University Press.Google Scholar
Cohen, Cheryl H. 1986. The feminist sexuality debate: Ethics and politics. Hypatia 1(2): 71–86.10.1111/j.1527-2001.1986.tb00838.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coole, D. 1988. Women in political theory: From ancient misogyny to contemporary feminism. Boulder, CO: L. Reinner Publishers; Brighton: Wheatsheaf Books.Google Scholar
Dalley, G. 1988. Ideologies of caring. Rethinking community and collectivism. Houndsmill and London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Davis, Kathy. 1991. Toward a feminist rhetoric: The Gilligan debate revisited. Women's Studies International Forum. In press.Google Scholar
De Vries, I. et al, eds. 1989. Ongewenste intimiteiten, gewenste rechten. Alphen aan den Rijn: Samson/Tjeenk Willink.Google Scholar
Elshtain, Jean Bethke. 1981. Public man, private woman. Women in social and political thought. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Elshtain, Jean Bethke. 1986. Kant and rational politics: Woman as a suspect category. In Meditations on modem political thought. Masculine and feminine themes from Luther to Arendt. Elshtain, Jean Bethke, ed. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Fraser, Nancy. 1987. What's critical about critical theory? The case of Habernaas and gender. In Feminism as critique. Essays on the politics of gender in late‐capitalist societies, Benhabib, Seyla and Cornell, Drucilla, eds. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press; Oxford: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Fraser, Nancy. 1989. Talking about needs: Interpretive contests as political conflicts in welfare state societies. Ethics 99: 291–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, Marilyn. 1988. Beyond caring: The de‐moralization of gender. Canadian Journal of Philosophy.Google Scholar
Fraser, Nancy and Nicholson, Linda. 1988. Social criticism without philosophy: An encounter between feminism and postmodernism. Theory, Culture and Society 5(2/3): 373–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilligan, Carol. 1980. In a different voice: Women's conceptions of self and morality. In The Future of Difference, Eisenstein, Hester and Jardine, Alice, eds. New Brunswick, NJ and London: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
Gilligan, Carol. 1982. In a different voice: Psychological theory and women's development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Gilligan, Carol. 1987. Moral orientation and moral development. In Women and moral theory. Feder Kittay, Eva and Meyers, Diana T. Totowa, NJ: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Griffiths, Morwenna. 1988. Feminism, feelings and philosophy. In Feminist perspectives in philosophy. Griffiths, Morwenna and Whitford, Margaret (eds). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press; Houndsmill: Macmillan.10.1007/978-1-349-19079-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grimshaw, Jean. 1986. Feminist philosophers: Women's perspectives on philosophical traditions. Brighton: Wheatsheaf Books. U.S. edition Feminism and Philosophy. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Grimshaw, Jean. 1988. Autonomy and identity in feminist thinking. In Feminist perspectives in philosophy. Griffiths, Morwenna and Whitford, Margaret (eds). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press and Houndsmill: Macmillan. Press.Google Scholar
Hagemann‐White, C. 1989. Geslacht en gedrag. In Socialisties‐feministiese teksten 11. Sevenhuijsen, Selmaet al., eds. Baarn: Ambo.Google Scholar
Haraway, Donna. 1988. Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Feminist Studies 14(3): 575–599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harding, Sandra. 1986a. The science question in feminism. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Harding, Sandra. 1986b. Feminism and methodology. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Held, Virginia. 1987. Feminism and moral theory. In Women and moral theory. Kittay, Eva Feder and Meyers, Diana T., eds. Totowa, NJ: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Held, Virginia. 1989a. Birth and death. Ethics 99: 362–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Held, Virginia. 1989b. Liberty and equality from a feminist perspective. In Enlightenment, rights and revolution. MacCormick, N. and Bankowski, Z. eds. Aberdeen: Aberdeen University Press.Google Scholar
Himmelweit, S. 1988. More than “A woman's right to choose”? Feminist Review 29:38–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodge, J. 1988. Subject, body and the exclusion of women from philosophy. In Feminist perspectives in philosophy. Griffiths, Morwenna and Whitford, Margaret, eds. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press; Houndsmill: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Houston, Barbara. 1988. Gilligan and the politics of a distinctive women's morality. In Feminist perspectives: Philosophical essays on method and morals. Code, Lorraineet al., eds. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Irigaray, Luce. 1989. Droits et devoirs pour les deux sexes. In Le temps de la difference. Pour une revolution pacifique. Irigaray, Luce, ed. Paris: Le livre de poche.Google Scholar
Jackson, K. 1989. And justice for all? Human nature and the feminist critique of liberalism. In Women and a new academy: Gender and cultural contexts. O'Barr, Jean, ed. Madison, WI: The University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Jaggar, Alison M. 1983. Feminist politics and human nature. Totowa, NJ: Rowman and Allanheld.Google Scholar
Jaggar, Alison M. 1989. Love, knowledge, and emotion in feminist epistemology. In Gender/body/knowledge: Feminist reconstructions of being and knowing. Jaggar, Alison M. and Bordo, Susan R., eds. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
Kennedy, Ellen and Mendus, Susan, eds. 1987. Women in Western political philosophy. Brighton: Wheatsheaf Books; New York: St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar
Kittay, Eva Feder and Meyers, Diana T., eds. 1987. Women and moral theory. Totowa, NJ: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Komter, A. 1989a. Lof der zorgzaamheid: Carol Gilligan en de ethic of care. Psychologie en Maatschappij 13(2): 316–21.Google Scholar
Komter, A. 1989b. Onder omstandigheden zelfs met geweld. Oude en nieuwe denkbeelden over “zedelijkheid” in de context van de machtsrelatie tussen vrouwen en mannen. In Ongewenste intimiteiten, gewenste rechten. De Vries, I.et al., eds. Alphen aan den Rijn: Samson/Tjeenk Willink.Google Scholar
Komter, A. 1990. De macht van de dubbele moraal. Beschouwingen en onderzoek over macht, moraal en sekse. Amsterdam: Van Gennep.Google Scholar
Landes, Joan. 1988. Women and the public sphere in the age of the French Revolution. Ithaca, NJ and London: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
de Lauretis, Teresa. 1986. Feminist studies/critical studies: Issues, terms, contexts. In Feminist studies/critical Studies. de Lauretis, Teresa, ed. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lloyd, Genevieve. 1984. The man of reason. “Male” and “Female” in Western Philosophy. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press; London, Methuen.Google Scholar
MacGregor Davies, P. 1988. Pornographic harms. In Feminist perspectives. Philosophical essays on method and morals. Code, Lorraineet al., eds. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Maihofer, A. 1988. Ansatze zur Kritik des moralischen Universalismus. Zur moraltheoretischen Diskussion um Gilligans Thesen zu einer “weiblichen” Moralauffassung. Feministische Studien 6: 1.10.1515/fs-1988-0105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, Emily. 1987. The woman in the body. A cultural analysis of reproduction. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Morgan, Kathryn Pauly. 1988. Women and moral madness. In Feminist Perspectives. Philosophical Essays on Method and Morals.Google Scholar
Code, Lorraineet al., eds. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Mullett, Sheila. 1988. Shifting perspective: a new approach to ethics. In Feminist perspectives. Philosophical essays on method and morals. Code, Lorraineet al., eds. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Okin, Susan Moller. 1979. Women in Western political thought. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Okin, Susan Moller. 1982. Women and the making of the sentimental family. Philosophy and Public Affairs 11: 65–88.Google Scholar
Okin, Susan Moller. 1987. Justice and gender. Philosophy and Public Affairs 1: 42–72.Google Scholar
Okin, Susan Moller. 1989. Reason and feeling in thinking about justice. Ethics 99: 229–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Neill, Onora. 1989. The great maxims of justice and charity. In Enlightenment, rights and revolution. MacCormick, N. and Bankowski, Z. eds. Aberdeen: Aberdeen University Press.Google Scholar
Outshoorn, J. 1989. Een irririterend onderwerp. Inaugurele rede Rijksuniversiteit Leiden. Nijmegen: SUN.Google Scholar
Pateman, Carole. 1988. The sexual contract. Oxford: Polity Press; Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Pateman, Carole. 1990. The disorder of women: Democracy, feminism and political theory. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press; Oxford: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Prins, B. 1988. Moeten vrouwen volwassen worden? Feministische ethiek en vrouwelijke moraal. Lover 4: 278–85.Google Scholar
Prins, B. 1989. Women, morality and the problem of exclusion. A critical enquiry into the ethical theories of Jürgen Habermas and Nel Noddings. Doctoral thesis, University of Groningen.Google Scholar
Ruddick, Sara. 1980. Maternal thinking. Feminist Studies 6(2): 343–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruddick, Sara. 1987. Remarks on the sexual politics of reason. In Women and moral theory. Kittay, Eva Feder and Meyers, Diana T., eds. Totowa, NJ: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Ruddick, Sara. 1989. Maternal thinking. Toward a politics of peace. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Sawicki, Jana. 1988. Identity politics and sexual freedom: Foucault and feminism. In Feminism and Foucault. Reflections on resistance. Diamond, Irene and Quinby, Lee, eds. Boston: Northeastern University Press.Google Scholar
Schiebinger, Londa. 1989. The mind has no sex? Women in the origins of modem science. Cambridge and London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Scott, Joan W. 1986. Gender: A useful category of historical analysis. American Historical Review 91: 1053–1075.10.2307/1864376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, Joan W. 1988. Deconstructing equality versus difference. Feminist Studies 14(1): xxxxx.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sevenhuijsen, Selma L. 1987. De orde van het vaderschap. Politieke debatten over huwelijk. Ongehuwd moederschap en afstamming in Nederland 1870–1900. Amsterdam: IISG‐Beheer.Google Scholar
Sevenhuijsen, Selma L. 1988. Vrouwelijkheid als bron van politieke wijsheid. Amerikaanse politieke filosofen over het moederschap. Amsterdams Sociologisch Tijdschrift 15(2): 208–34.Google Scholar
Sevenhuijsen, Selma L. 1989. Gelijkheid en rechtvaardigheid. Feminisme en de politieke theorie van John Rawls. Recht en Kritiek 15(2): 137–60.Google Scholar
Sevenhuijsen, Selma L. 1991. Justice, morality and the politics of child custody. In Equality Politics and Gender. Meehan, E. and Sevenhuijsen, S. eds. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Smart, Carol. 1989. Feminism and the power of the law. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Spelman, Elizabeth V. 1989. Inessential woman. Problems of exclusion in feminist thought. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Tronto, Joan. 1987. Beyond gender difference to a theory of care. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Sosiety, 12(4): 644–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tronto, Joan. 1989. Women and caring: What can feminists learn about morality from caring?. In Gender/body/knowledge. Feminist reconstructions of being and knowing. Jaggar, Alison M. and Bordo, Susan R., eds. New Brunswick, NJ and London: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
Thornton, M. 1986. Sex equality is not enough for feminism. In Feminist challenges. Social and political theory. Pateman, Carole and Gross, Elizabeth, eds. Sydney, London and Boston: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Van Der Haegen, R. 1989. In het spoor van seksuele differentie. Nijmegen: SUN.Google Scholar
Waerness, K. 1987. On the rationality of caring. In Women and the State. Showstack Sassoon, A., ed. London: Hutchinson.Google Scholar
Woodhull, W. 1988. Sexuality, power and the question of rape. In Feminism and Foucault. Reflections on Resistance. Diamond, Irene and Quinby, Lee, eds. Boston: Northeastern University Press.Google Scholar
Young, Iris Marion. 1987. Impartiality and the civic public: Some implications of feminist critiques of moral and political theory. In Feminism as critigue. Essays on the politics of gender in late capitalist societies. Benhabib, Seyla and Cornell, Drucilla, eds. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press; Oxford: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Young, Iris Marion. 1989. Polity and group difference: A critique of the ideal of universal citizenship. Ethics 99: 250–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar