Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-cphqk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-14T10:18:10.306Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Other Mothers: Toward an Ethic of Postmaternal Practice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 March 2020

Meredith W. Michaels
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This essay attempts a deliberately perverse interpretation of die new reproductive practices (e.g., contract pregnancy, in vitro fertilization, etc.) in an effort to rethink maternal subjectivity and the bodies that might accompany it.

Type
Research Article
Information
Hypatia , Volume 11 , Issue 2 , Spring 1996 , pp. 49 - 70
Copyright
Copyright © 1996 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allen, Jeffner. 1984. Motherhood: The annihilation of women. In Mothering: Essays in feminist theory, ed. Joyce, . Totowa, NJ: Rowman and Allanheld.Google Scholar
Atwood, Margaret. 1986. The handmaid's tale. New York: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Babbitt, Susan. 1994. Identity, knowledge, and Toni Morrison's Beloved: Questions about understanding racism. Hypatia 9(3): 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Beauvoir, Simone. 1974. The second sex. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
Biddick, Kathleen. 1993. Stranded histories: Feminist allegories of artificial life. Research in Philosophy and Technology 13(1): 165–82.Google Scholar
Braidotti, Rosi. 1989. Organs without bodies. Differences 1(1): 147–61.Google Scholar
Butler, Octavia. 1987. Dawn. New York: Warner.Google Scholar
Chesler, Phyllis. 1988. Sacred bond: The legacy of Baby M. New York: Times Books.Google Scholar
Collins, Patricia Hill. 1991. Block feminist thought. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Corea, Gena. 1986. The mother machine: Reproductive technologies from artificial insemination to artificial wombs. New York: Harper and Row.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cornell, Drucilla. 1991. Beyond accomodation: Ethical feminism, deconstruction and the law. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
De Lauretis, Teresa. 1986. Feminist studies/Critical studies: Issues, terms and contexts. In Feminist studies/Critical studies, ed. De Lauretis, Teresa. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deleuze, Giles and Guattari, Felix. 1983. Anti‐Oedipus: Capitalism and schizophrenia. Trans. Hurley, R.Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Doane, Janice and Hodges, Devon. 1989. Risky business: Familial ideology and the case of Baby M. Differences 1(1): 67–81.Google Scholar
Dworkin, Andrea. 1983. Right‐wing women. London: Wideview Perigree.Google Scholar
Firestone, Shulamith. 1970. The dialectic of sex. New York: William Morrow.Google Scholar
Frank, Diana and Vogel, Marta. 1988. The baby makers‐ New York: Carroll and Graf.Google Scholar
Gilligan, Carol. 1982. In a different voice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Gilman, Charlotte Perkins. 1979. Herland. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
Ginsburg, Faye. 1989. Contested lives: The abortion debate in an American community. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Gordon, Linda. 1982. Why nineteenth‐century feminists did not support “birth control” and twentieth‐century feminists do: Feminism, reproduction, and the family. In Rethinking the family, ed. Thome, Barrie and Marilyn, . New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Haitnes, Erica. 1990. Recreating the family? Policy considerations relating to the “new” reproductive technologies. In The new reproductive technologies, ed. McNeil, Maureen, Varcoe, Ian, and Steven, . New York: St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar
Hall, Stuart. 1991. Ethnicity, identity, and difference. Radical America 23(4): 9–20.Google Scholar
Haraway, Donna. 1991. Simians, cyborgs, and women: The reinvention of nature. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hartouni, Valerie. 1991. Reproductive discourse in the 1980s. In Technocuiture, ed. Penley, Constance and Andrew, . Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Holmes, Helen Berquaert ed., 1994. Issues in reproductive technology. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Lasker, Judith N. and Borg, Susan. 1989. In search of parenthood: Coping with infertility and high‐tech conception. London: Pandora.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lorde, Audre. 1983. The master's tools will never dismantle the master's house. In This bridge called my back, ed. Moraga, Cherrie and Gloria, . New York: Kitchen Table Press.Google Scholar
Luker, Kristin. 1984. Abortion and the politics of motherhood. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Michaels, Meredith. 1992. Conflicting rights, conflicting conceptions: The case of surrogate motherhood. In Thirteen questions in ethics, ed. Lee Bowie, G., Michaels, Meredith W., and Higgins, Kathleen W.New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
Collective, Milan Bookstore. 1990. Sexual difference: A theory of social‐symbolic practice. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Miller, Nancy K. 1991. Getting personal. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Modleski, Tania. 1991. Feminism without women. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Nelson, Hilde Lindemann. 1994. Scrutinizing surrogacy. In Issues in reproductive technology, ed. Holmes, Helen Berquaert. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Penley, Constance and Ross, Andrew. 1991. Cyborgs at large: Interview with Donna Haraway. In Technoculture, ed. Penley, Constance and Andrew, . Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Piercy, Marge. 1976. Woman on the edge of time. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
Purdy, Laura. 1994. Another look at contract pregnancy. In Issues in reproductive technology, ed. Holmes, Helen Berquaert. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Raymond, Janice. 1993. Women as wombs: Reproductive technologies and the battle over women's freedom. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
Rosier, Martha. 1988. Martha Rosier reads the strange case of Baby S/M. New York: Paper Tiger Television.Google Scholar
Rothman, Barbara Katz. 1989. Recreating motherhood: Ideology and technology in a patriarchal society. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
Ruddick, Sara. 1982. Maternal thinking. In Rethinking the family, ed. Thorne, Barrie and Marilyn, . New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Ruddick, Sara. 1989. Maternal thinking: Toward a politics of peace. Boston: Beacon.Google Scholar
Sawicki, Jana. 1991. Disciplining Foucault: Feminism, power and the body. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Singer, Linda. 1989. Bodies—pleasures—owers. Differences 1(1): 45–65.Google Scholar
Stabile, Carole A. 1994. Feminism and the technological fix. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Stanworth, Michelle. 1990. Birth pangs: Contraceptive technologies and the threat to motherhood. In Conflicts in feminism, ed. Hirsch, Marianne and Keller, Evelyn Fox. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Troester, Rosalie Riegle. 1986. Turbulence and tenderness: Mothers, daughters, and “othermothers” in Paule Marshall's Brown girl, brownstones. Sage: A Scholarly Journal on Black Women 1(2): 13–16.Google Scholar
Turim, Maureen. 1991. Viewing/reading Born to be sold: Martha Rosier reads the strange case of Baby S/M or motherhood in the age of technological reproduction. Discourse 13(2): 21–38.Google Scholar
Warnock, Mary. 1985. A question of life: The Wamock report on human fertilization and embryology. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Williams, Raymond. 1980. Problems in materialism and culture. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Wittig, Monique. 1980. The straight mind. Feminist Issues 1(1): 103–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar