Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T09:52:15.908Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Sexual Difference and Decolonization: Oyĕwùmí and Irigaray in Dialogue about Western Culture

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2020

Azille Coetzee  and
Annemie Halsema
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this article we aim to show the potential of cross‐continental dialogues for a decolonizing feminism. We relate the work of one of the major critics of the Western metaphysical patriarchal order, Luce Irigaray, to the critique of the colonial/modern gender system by the Nigerian feminist scholar Oyĕrónké Oyĕwùmí. Oyĕwùmí's work is often rejected based on the argument that it is empirically wrong. We start by problematizing this line of thinking by providing an epistemological interpretation of Oyĕwùmí's claims. We then draw Irigaray and Oyĕwùmí into conversation, and show how this bolsters and helps to further illuminate and contextualize Oyĕwùmí's critique of gender. But the dialogue between these thinkers also reveals significant limitations of Irigaray's philosophy, namely her presumption of the priority of sexual difference, its rigid duality, and her failure to take into account the inextricable intertwinement of gender and race in the Western patriarchal order. Relating Irigaray's critique of Western culture's forgetting of sexual difference to Oyĕwùmí's critique hence demonstrates to what extent Irigaray's philosophy remains typically Western and how she therefore fails to escape the paradigm that she is so critical of.

Type
Articles
Information
Hypatia , Volume 33 , Issue 2 , Spring 2018 , pp. 178 - 194
Copyright
Copyright © 2018 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bakare‐Yusuf, Bibi. 2003. “Yorùbás don't do gender”: A critical review of Oyèrónké Oyěwùmí's The invention of women: Making an African sense of western gender discourses. African Identities 1 (1): 121–42.Google Scholar
Braidotti, Rosi. 1992. On the female feminist subject, or: From “she‐self” to “she‐other.” In Beyond equality and difference: Citizenship, feminist politics and female subjectivity, ed. Bock, Gisela and James, Susan. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Braidotti, Rosi. 2002. Metamorphoses: Towards a materialist theory of becoming. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Butler, Judith. 1990. Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Butler, Judith, Cornell, Drucilla, with Cheah, Pheng and Grosz, Elizabeth. 1998. The future of sexual difference: An interview with Judith Butler and Drucilla Cornell. Diacritics 28 (1): 19–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deutscher, Penelope. 2002. A politics of impossible difference: The later work of Luce Irigaray. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Escobar, Arturo. 2007. Worlds and knowledges otherwise. Cultural Studies 21 (2–3): 179–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grosz, Elizabeth. 2012. The nature of sexual difference. Angelaki 17 (2): 69–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halsema, Annemie. 2008. Phenomenology in the feminine: Irigaray's relationship to Merleau‐Ponty. In Intertwinings: Interdisciplinary encounters with Merleau‐Ponty, ed. Weiss, Gail. Albany: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
Hom, Sabrina L. 2013. Between races and generations: Materializing race and kinship in Moraga and Irigaray. Hypatia 28 (3): 419–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Irigaray, Luce. 1985a. Speculum of the other woman. Trans. Gillian C. Gill. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Irigaray, Luce. 1985b. This sex which is not one. Trans. Catherine Porter. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Irigaray, Luce. 1993a. An ethics of sexual difference. Trans. Carolyn Burke and Gillian C. Gill. New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Irigaray, Luce. 1993b. Sexes and genealogies. Trans. Gillian C. Gill. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Irigaray, Luce. 1996. I love to you: Sketch of a possible felicity in history. Trans. Alison Martin. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Irigaray, Luce. 2001. Democracy begins between two. Trans. Kirsteen Anderson. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Jacobs, Sue‐Ellen, Wesley, Thomas, and Lang, Sabine. 1997. Two‐spirit people: Native American gender identity, sexuality, and spirituality. Urbana‐Champaign: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Lugones, María. 2007. Heterosexualism and the colonial/modern gender system. Hypatia 22 (1): 186–209.Google Scholar
Mama, Amina. 2001. Challenging subjects: Gender and power in African contexts (plenary address, Nordic Africa Institute Conference: ‘Beyond identity: Rethinking power in Africa’, Upsala, October 4–7). African Sociological Review 5 (2): 63–73.Google Scholar
Mbembe, Achille. 2001. On the postcolony. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
McClintock, Anne. 1995. Imperial leather: Race, gender and sexuality in the colonial contest. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Mohanty, Chandra Talpade. 1986. Under western eyes: Feminist scholarship and colonial discourses. Boundary 2 12 (3): 333–58.Google Scholar
Mohanty, Chandra Talpade. 2002. “Under western eyes” revisited: Feminist solidarity through anticapitalist struggles. Signs 28 (2): 499–535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nzegwu, Nkiru. 1994. Gender equality in a dual‐sex system: The case of Onitsha. Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 7 (1): 73–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nzegwu, Nkiru. 2005. Feminism and Africa: Impact and limits of the metaphysics of gender. In A companion to African philosophy, ed. Wiredu, Kwasi. Malden, Mass.: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
Nzegwu, Nkiru. 2006. Family matters: Feminist concepts in African philosophy of culture. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Olajubu, Oyeronke. 2004. Seeing through a woman's eye: Yorùbá religious tradition and gender relations. Journal of Feminist Studies in Religion 20 (1): 41–60.Google Scholar
Olupona, Jacob K. 2002. Imagining the power of the goddess: Gender in Yorùbá religious traditions and modernity. Lecture, Princeton University, Princeton.Google Scholar
Oyĕwùmí, Oyĕrónké. 1997. The invention of women: Making an African sense of western gender discourses. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Oyĕwùmí, Oyĕrónké. 2002. Conceptualizing gender: The Eurocentric foundations of feminist concepts and the challenge of African epistemologies. JENdA: A Journal of Culture and African Women Studies 2 (1): 1–9.Google Scholar
Oyĕwùmí, Oyĕrónké. 2011. Gender epistemologies in Africa: Gendering traditions, spaces, social institutions, and identities. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oyĕwùmí, Oyĕrónké. 2016. What gender is motherhood? Changing Yorùbá ideals of power, procreation, and identity in the age of modernity. New York: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Peel, John D. Y. 2002. Gender in Yorùbá religious change. Journal of Religion in Africa 32 (2): 136–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sandoval, Chela. 2000. Methodology of the oppressed. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Sharpe, Jenny. 1993. Allegories of empire: The figure of woman in the colonial text. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Spivak, Gayatri C. 1988. Can the subaltern speak? In Marxism and the interpretation of culture, ed. Nelson, Cary and Grossberg, Lawrence. Basingstoke, UK: Macmillan Education.Google Scholar
Spivak, Gayatri C. 1992. French feminism revisited: Ethics and politics. In Feminists theorize the political, ed. Butler, Judith and Scott, Joan W.New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Stone, Alison. 2006. Luce Irigaray and the philosophy of sexual difference. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wieringa, Saskia E. 2010. Gender variance in Asia: Discursive contestations and legal implications. Gender, Technology and Development 14 (2): 143–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar