No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Kyrgyz Republic v. Petrobart Limited
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 January 2021
Abstract
Arbitration — Challenge to validity of arbitral award — Whether valid arbitration agreement between parties — Section 34 of Swedish Arbitration Act — Whether sale and purchase agreement for condensed gas constituting investment under Energy Charter Treaty, 1994 — Whether administrative errors affecting outcome of case — Whether Swedish court to set aside Arbitral Award II
Treaties — Energy Charter Treaty, 1994 (“ECT”) — Interpretation — ECT provisionally applicable to Gibraltar — Gibraltar not mentioned in ratification instrument — Whether ECT applicable to Gibraltar
Foreign investment — Definition of investment — Energy Charter Treaty, 1994, Article 1(5) and (6) — Whether condensed gas agreement constituting an investment under the ECT
Costs — Litigation costs — Whether requested amount reasonable — Interest
- Type
- Case Report
- Information
- Copyright
- © Cambridge University Press 2008