Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T20:57:31.907Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Kyrgyz Republic v. Petrobart Limited

Sweden, Svea Court of Appeal..  19 January 2007 .

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2021

Get access

Abstract

Arbitration — Challenge to validity of arbitral award — Whether valid arbitration agreement between parties — Section 34 of Swedish Arbitration Act — Whether sale and purchase agreement for condensed gas constituting investment under Energy Charter Treaty, 1994 — Whether administrative errors affecting outcome of case — Whether Swedish court to set aside Arbitral Award II

Treaties — Energy Charter Treaty, 1994 (“ECT”) — Interpretation — ECT provisionally applicable to Gibraltar — Gibraltar not mentioned in ratification instrument — Whether ECT applicable to Gibraltar

Foreign investment — Definition of investment — Energy Charter Treaty, 1994, Article 1(5) and (6) — Whether condensed gas agreement constituting an investment under the ECT

Costs — Litigation costs — Whether requested amount reasonable — Interest

Type
Case Report
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)