Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-29T07:01:02.597Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Metalclad Corporation v. United Mexican States

ICSID (Arbitration Tribunal).  30 August 2000 .

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2021

Get access

Abstract

State responsibility — nafta Article 201(2) — State internationally responsible for acts of local or provincial governments — Exemptions of Article 1108(1) do not extend to states or local governments

Expropriation — nafta Article 1105 — Requirement of fair and equitable treatment — Duty to ensure “transparency” — nafta Article 1110 — Prohibition of expropriation — Deliberate and acknowledged takings — Applies equally to outright seizure or covert or incidental interference — Effect to deprive owner of use or expected benefit of property — Measure tantamount to expropriation — Permitting or tolerating conduct of municipality — Participation or acquiescence in deprivation of rights — Indirect expropriation — Reliance on representations of federal government — Absence of substantive basis for denial of permit — Subsequent Ecological Decree barring operation of landfill

Municipal law — Limited extent of municipal authority — Denial of permit improper — Municipality acting outside authority

Damages — Arising under nafta Articles 1105 and 1110 — Compensation for complete frustration of meaningful return on investment — nafta Article 1135 — Award of monetary damages and applicable interest for violation of Chapter 11 — Claim for negative effect on other business operations — Causal relationship too remote and uncertain — Expenses — Evidential weight of tax returns and independent audit documents — Difficulty in verifying expense items does not invalidate claims

Valuation — Fair market value of a going concern — History of profitable operation — Estimate of future profits subject to discounted cash flow analysis — nafta Article 1110(2) — Fair market value of investment immediately before expropriation — Valuation based on going concern value, asset value including declared tax value of tangible property and other criteria — Expenses from different projects aggregated and allocated to another project — Concept of “bundling” not applicable in the circumstances

Remediation — Requirement of remediation accounted for in calculation of damages

Interest — nafta Article 1135(1) — Inclusion of interest in calculation of damages — Integral part of compensation — Interest to run from date when international responsibility engaged — Selection of appropriate date from which to impose interest

Type
Case Report
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)