Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T21:24:17.055Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Tradex Hellas SA v. Republic of Albania

ICSID (Arbitration Tribunal).  24 December 1996 ; 29 April 1999 .

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2021

Get access

Abstract

Applicable law — Bilateral investment treaty — Interpretation of applicable domestic legislation

Municipal law — Interpretation — Definition of “investor” — Date of entry into force — Retroactive application of substantial and procedural provisions — Succession of new legislation providing for different methods of dispute settlement — Unilateral consent to icsid jurisdiction by Contracting State in its national laws — Consent effective when claim filed

Jurisdiction — Consent — Unilateral consent given by Contracting State in its law — Requirement of prior good faith effort to settle dispute amicably

Procedure — Ruling allowing parties four weeks to file post-hearing memoranda, but no new documents to be submitted — Party’s attempt to submit additional correspondence rejected

Procedure — Witness testimony based on forged documents — Testimony allowed but Tribunal to assess probative value after cross-examination — Objections to evidence not relevant to merits of claim

Procedure — Burden of proof on Claimant — Articles 33 to 37 of the icsid Convention — Evidentiary value of unsworn witness statement

Foreign investment — Burden of proof — Broad definition in the applicable law — Sources of finance irrelevant for this purpose

Expropriation — Indirect taking or measure of tantamount effect — Compulsory transfer of property rights — Privatization of farming co-operatives — Government decision in principle to transfer and privatize land — Invasion of property by villagers while decision pending — Alleged damage by animals and occupation leading to failure of joint venture — Dissolution of joint venture — Combined impact of incidents did not constitute expropriation

Costs — Claim not frivolous in view of the difficult issues of fact and law — No order for costs

Type
Case Report
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)