Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T05:34:30.506Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

It Is Not Yet Time to Dismiss Dimensions in Assessment Centers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 January 2015

Klaus G. Melchers*
Affiliation:
Universität Zürich
Cornelius J. König
Affiliation:
Universität Zürich
*
E-mail: k.melchers@psychologie.uzh.ch, Address: Psychologisches Institut, Universität Zürich, Binzmühlestrasse 14/12, CH-8050 Zürich, Switzerland

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Commentaries
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology 2008 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Psychologisches Institut, Universität Zürich

References

Bowler, M. C., & Woehr, D. J. (2006). A meta-analytic evaluation of the impact of dimension and exercise factors on assessment center ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 11141124.10.1037/0021-9010.91.5.1114Google Scholar
Gaugler, B. B., Rosenthal, D. B., Thornton, G. C., & Bentson, C. (1987). Meta-analysis of assessment center validity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 72, 493511.10.1037/0021-9010.72.3.493Google Scholar
Kleinmann, M. (1993). Are rating dimensions in assessment centers transparent for participants? Consequences for criterion and construct validity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 988993.10.1037/0021-9010.78.6.988Google Scholar
König, C. J., Melchers, K. G., Richter, G. M., Kleinmann, M., & Klehe, U.-C. (2007). The ability to identify criteria in nontransparent selection procedures: Evidence from an assessment center and a structured interview. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 15, 283292.10.1111/j.1468-2389.2007.00388.xGoogle Scholar
Lance, C. E., Foster, M. R., Gentry, W. A., & Thoresen, J. D. (2004). Assessor cognitive processes in an operational assessment center. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 2235.10.1037/0021-9010.89.1.22Google Scholar
Lance, C. E. (2008). Why assessment centers do not work the way they are supposed to. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 1, 8497.10.1111/j.1754-9434.2007.00017.xGoogle Scholar
Lievens, F. (2001). Assessors and use of assessment centre dimensions: A fresh look at a troubling issue. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22, 203221.10.1002/job.65Google Scholar
Lievens, F. (2002). Trying to understand the different pieces of the construct validity puzzle of assessment centers: An examination of assessor and assessee effects. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 675686.10.1037/0021-9010.87.4.675Google Scholar
Preckel, D., & Schüpbach, H. (2005). Zusammenhänge zwischen rezeptiver Selbstdarstellungskompetenz und Leistung im Assessment Center [Correlations between receptive self-presentation competence and performance in an assessment center]. Zeitschrift für Personalpsychologie, 4, 151158.10.1026/1617-6391.4.4.151Google Scholar
Roth, P. L., Bobko, P., & McFarland, L. A. (2005). A meta-analysis of work sample test validity: Updating and integrating some classic literature. Personnel Psychology, 58, 10091037.10.1111/j.1744-6570.2005.00714.xGoogle Scholar
Schleicher, D. J., Day, D. V., Mayes, B. T., & Riggio, R. E. (2002). A new frame for frame-of-reference training: Enhancing the construct validity of assessment centers. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 735746.10.1037/0021-9010.87.4.735Google Scholar
Woehr, D. J., & Arthur, W. (2003). The construct-related validity of assessment center ratings: A review and meta-analysis of the role of methodological factors. Journal of Management, 29, 231258.10.1177/014920630302900206Google Scholar