Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-lrblm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-14T00:20:58.070Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Rearranging the deck chairs on the Titanic: What are practitioners to do?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 August 2023

Gerald V. Barrett  and
Dennis Doverspike
Gerald V. Barrett*
Affiliation:
Barrett and Associates Inc, Silver Lake, OH, USA
Dennis Doverspike
Affiliation:
Barrett and Associates Inc, Silver Lake, OH, USA
*
Corresponding author: Gerald V. Barrett; Email: gbarrett@barrett-associates.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Commentaries
Information
Industrial and Organizational Psychology , Volume 16 , Issue 3 , September 2023 , pp. 349 - 352
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arthur, W. Jr., & Villado, A. J. (2008). The importance of distinguishing between constructs and methods when comparing predictors in personnel selection research and practice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(2), 435–442. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.93.2.435.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barrett, G. V. (1972). Research models of the future for industrial and organizational psychology. Personnel Psychology, 25(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1972.tb01086.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barrett, G. V., & Bishop, N. B. (2000). Report on the firefighter selection process and on the development and validation of the Firefighter Personal Preference Inventory (Report prepared for the City of Columbus). Barrett & Associates, Inc.Google Scholar
Barrett, G. V., Polomsky, M. D., & McDaniel, M. A. (1999). Selection tests for firefighters: A comprehensive review and meta-analysis. Journal of Business and Psychology, 13(4), 507–513. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022966820186 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Millard, K. A. (1952). Is how supervise? An intelligence test? Journal of Applied Psychology, 36(4), 221–224. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0057153 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, C. E., & Barrett, G. V. (2008). The coachability and fakability of personality-based selection tests used for police selection. Public Personnel Management, 37(3), 339–351. https://doi.org/10.1177/009102600803700306 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mount, M. K., & Barrick, M. R. (1995). The big five personality dimensions: Implications for research and practice in human resources management. In Ferris, G. R. (Ed.), Research in personnel and human resources management (Vol. 13, pp. 153–200). JAI Press Inc.Google Scholar
Paajanen, G. E., (1988). The prediction of counterproductive behavior by individual and organizational variables. (Doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota). Retrieved from https://www.proquest.com/openview/f059fc693a238ec38e3acbebb94594a4/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=18750&diss=y Google Scholar
Sackett, P. R., Dahlke, J. A., Shewach, O. R., & Kuncel, N. R. (2017). Effects of predictor weighting methods on incremental validity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 102(10), 1421–1434. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000235 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sackett, P. R., Zhang, C., Berry, C. M., & Lievens, F. (2022). Revisiting meta-analytic estimates of validity in personnel selection: Addressing systematic overcorrection for restriction of range. Journal of Applied Psychology, 107 (11), 2040–2068. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000994 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sackett, P. R., Zhang, C., Berry, C. M., & Lievens, F. (2023). Revisiting the design of selection systems in light of new findings regarding the validity of widely used predictors. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 16(3), 283–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (1998). The validity and utility of selection methods in personnel psychology: Practical and theoretical implications of 85 years of research findings. Psychological Bulletin, 124(2), 262–274. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.124.2.262 CrossRefGoogle Scholar