Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T11:21:25.718Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Triangulation Across Methodologies: All Signs Point to Persistent Stereotyping and Discrimination in Organizations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 January 2015

Lisa M. Leslie ,
Eden B. King ,
Jill C. Bradley  and
Michelle R. Hebl
Lisa M. Leslie*
Affiliation:
University of Minnesota
Eden B. King
Affiliation:
George Mason University
Jill C. Bradley
Affiliation:
California State University
Michelle R. Hebl
Affiliation:
Rice University
*
E-mail: lmleslie@umn.edu, Address: Carlson School of Management, Department of Psychology, University of Minnesota, 321, 19th Avenue South, Suite 3-300, Minneapolis, MN 55455
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Commentaries
Information
Industrial and Organizational Psychology , Volume 1 , Issue 4 , December 2008 , pp. 399 - 404
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology 2008 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Carlson School of Management, Department of Psychology, University of Minnesota

**

Department of Psychology, George Mason University

***

Craig School of Business, California State University

References

Allport, G. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Oxford, UK: Addison Wesley.Google Scholar
Bertrand, M., & Mullainathan, S. (2004). Are Emily and Greg more employable than Lakisha and Jamal? A field experiment on labor market discrimination. American Economic Review, 94, 991–1013.Google Scholar
Black, V. (1955). Laboratory versus field research in psychology and the social sciences. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 5, 319–330.Google Scholar
Blau, F. D., & Kahn, L. M. (2007). The gender pay gap: Have women gone as far as they can? Academy of Management Perspectives, 21, 7–23.Google Scholar
Cameron, J. A., & Trope, Y. (2004). Stereotype-biased search and processing of information about group members. Social Cognition, 22, 650–672.Google Scholar
Coleman, M. G. (2003). Job skill and Black male wage discrimination. Social Science Quarterly, 84, 892–906.Google Scholar
Correll, S. J., Benard, S., & Paik, I. (2007). Getting a job: Is there a motherhood penalty? American Journal of Sociology, 112, 1297–1338.Google Scholar
Fix, M., & Turner, M. A. (1998). A national report card on discrimination in America: The role of testing. Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.Google Scholar
Fugazza, M. (2003). Racial discrimination: Theories, facts and policy. International Labour Review, 142, 507–541.Google Scholar
Glick, P., Zion, C., & Nelson, C. (1988). What mediates sex discrimination in hiring decisions? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 178–186.Google Scholar
Hebl, M., Foster, J. M., Mannix, L. M., & Dovidio, J. F. (2002). Formal and interpersonal discrimination: A field study examination of applicant bias. Personality and Social Psychological Bulletin, 28, 815–825.Google Scholar
Hebl, M. R., King, E. B., Glick, P., Singletary, S., & Kazama, S. (2007). Hostile and benevolent reactions to pregnant women: Complementary interpersonal punishments and rewards that maintain traditional gender roles. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 1499–1511.Google Scholar
Heilman, M. E. (2001). Description and prescription: How gender stereotypes prevent women’s ascent up the organizational ladder. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 657–674.Google Scholar
Kahn, L. M., & Sherer, P. D. (1988). Racial differences in professional basketball players’ compensation. Journal of Labor Economics, 6, 40–61.Google Scholar
King, E., Shapiro, J. L., Hebl, M., Singletary, S., & Turner, S. (2006). The stigma of obesity in customer service: A mechanism for remediation and bottom-line consequences of interpersonal discrimination. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 579–593.Google Scholar
Landy, F. J. (2008). Stereotypes, bias, and personnel decisions: Strange and stranger. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 1, 379–392.Google Scholar
Lykken, D. T. (1968). Statistical significance in psychological research. Psychological Bulletin, 70, 151–159.Google Scholar
Martell, R. F., Lane, D. M., & Emrich, C. (1996). Male-female differences: A computer simulation. American Psychologist, 56, 157–158.Google Scholar
Neumark, D. M. (1996). Sex discrimination in restaurant hiring: An audit study. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 111, 915–941.Google Scholar
Shapiro, J., King, E. B., & Quiñones, M. (2007). Expectations of obese trainees: How stigmatized trainee characteristics influence training effectiveness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 239–249.Google Scholar
Sherman, J. W., Stroessner, S. J., Conrey, F. R., & Azam, O. A. (2005). Prejudice and stereotype maintenance processes: Attention, attribution, and individuation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 607–622.Google Scholar
Singletary, S. L. B., & Hebl, M. (in press). Compensatory strategies for reducing interpersonal discrimination: The effectiveness of acknowledgment, increased positivity, and individuating information. Journal of Applied Psychology.Google Scholar