Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T19:33:41.889Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Will Exploring the Darkness Prove Enlightening? Five Questions About the “Maladaptive Big Five”

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 January 2015

Justin A. DeSimone
Justin A. DeSimone*
Affiliation:
University of Nebraska-Lincoln
*
E-mail: jad@unl.edu, Address: Department of Management, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, CBA 263, P.O. Box 880491, Lincoln, NE 68588-0491
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Commentaries
Information
Industrial and Organizational Psychology , Volume 7 , Issue 1 , March 2014 , pp. 126 - 130
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

American Psychiatric Association (APA). (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.Google Scholar
Anderson, C. D., Warner, J. L., & Spector, C. E. (1984). Inflation bias in self-assessment examination: Implications for valid employee selection. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69, 574–580.Google Scholar
Ellingson, J. E., Sackett, P. R., & Connelly, B. S. (2007). Personality assessments across selection and developmental contexts: Insights into response distortion. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 386–395.Google Scholar
Embretson, S. E., & Riese, S. P. (2000). Item response theory for psychologists. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Guenole, N. (2014). Maladaptive personality at work: Exploring the darkness. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 7(1), 85–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haidt, J. (2001). The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychological Review, 108, 814–834.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McClelland, D. C. (1980). Motive dispositions: The merits of operant and respondent measures. In Wheeler, L. (Ed.), Review of personality and social psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 10–41). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
McClelland, D. C., Koestner, R., & Weinberger, J. (1989). How do self-attributed and implicit motives differ? Psychological Review, 96, 690–702.Google Scholar
Morgeson, F. P., Campion, M. A., Dipboye, R. L., Hollenbeck, J. R., Murphy, K., & Schmitt, N. (2007). Reconsidering the use of personality tests in personnel selection contexts. Personnel Psychology, 60, 683–729.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nisbett, R. E., & Wilson, T. D. (1977). Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. Psychological Review, 84, 231–259.Google Scholar
Paunonen, S. V., & Ashton, M. C. (2001). Big five factors and facets and the prediction of behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 524–539.Google Scholar
Whyte, W. H. Jr. (1956). How to cheat on personality tests. In The organization man (pp. 405–410). New York, NY: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar