Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T03:53:37.513Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Devil Is in the Details (and the Context): A Call for Care in Discussing the Uniform Guidelines

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 January 2015

Paul J. Hanges ,
Juliet R. Aiken  and
Elizabeth D. Salmon
Paul J. Hanges*
Affiliation:
University of Maryland
Juliet R. Aiken
Affiliation:
Georgetown Law Center
Elizabeth D. Salmon
Affiliation:
University of Maryland
*
E-mail: hanges@psyc.umd.edu, Address: Department of Psychology, University of Maryland, 1147 Biology/Psychology Building, College Park, MD 20742
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Commentaries
Information
Industrial and Organizational Psychology , Volume 4 , Issue 4 , December 2011 , pp. 562 - 565
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology 2011 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Asbury, K., Wachs, T. D., & Plomin, R. (2005). Environmental moderators of genetic influence on verbal and nonverbal abilities in early childhood. Intelligence, 33, 643–661. Google Scholar
Ceci, S. J., & Papierno, P. B. (2005). The rhetoric and reality of gap closing: When “have-nots” gain but the “haves” gain even more. American Psychologist, 60, 149–160. Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C.Google Scholar
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Civil Service Commission, Department of Labor, & Department of Justice. (1978). Uniform guidelines on employee selection procedures. Federal Register, 43, 38290–39315. Google Scholar
Ganzach, Y. (2000). Parents' education, cognitive ability, educational expectations and educational attainment: Interactive effects. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 70, 419–441. Google Scholar
Grant, M. D., Kremen, W. S., Jacobson, K. C., Franz, C., Xian, H., Eisen, S. A., Lyons, M. J. (2010). Does parental education have a moderating effect on the genetic and environmental influences of general cognitive ability in early adulthood. Behavioral Genetics, 40, 438–446. Google Scholar
Griggs v. Duke Power Co. (1971). 401 U.S. 424.Google Scholar
Harden, K. P., Turkheimer, E., & Loehlin, J. C. (2006). Gene by environment interaction in adolescents' cognitive aptitude. Behavioral Genetics, 37, 273–283. Google Scholar
Johnson, W., Deary, I. J., & Iacono, W. G. (2009). Genetic and environmental transactions underlying educational attainment. Intelligence, 37, 466–478. Google Scholar
Magnuson, K. A., Ruhm, C., & Waldfogel, J. (2004). Does prekindergarten improve school preparation and performance? Economics of Education Review, 26, 33–51. Google Scholar
McDaniel, M. A., Kepes, S., Banks, G. C. (2011). The Uniform Guidelines are a detriment to the field of personnel selection. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 4, 494–514.Google Scholar
van den Oord, E., & Rowe, D. C. (1998). An examination of genotype-environment interactions for academic achievement in a U.S. longitudinal survey. Intelligence, 25, 205–219. Google Scholar
Rowe v. General Motors Corp. (1972). 457 F.2d 348().Google Scholar
Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology (SIOP). (2003). Principles for the validation and use of personnel selection procedures (4th ed.). Bowling Green, OH: Author. Google Scholar
Teachman, J. D. (1987). Family background, educational resources and educational attainment. American Sociological Review, 52, 548–557. Google Scholar
Turkheimer, E., Haley, A., Waldron, M., D’Onofrio, B., & Gottesman, I. I. (2003). Socioeconomic status modifies heritability of IQ in young children. Psychological Science, 14, 623–628. Google Scholar