Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T02:21:03.207Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Good work, poor work? We need to go far beyond capitalism to answer this question

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 January 2020

Daniela M. Andrei Open the ORCID record for Daniela M. Andrei [Opens in a new window] ,
Anja Van den Broeck  and
Sharon K. Parker
Daniela M. Andrei*
Affiliation:
Curtin University
Anja Van den Broeck
Affiliation:
KU Leuven
Sharon K. Parker
Affiliation:
Curtin University
*
*Corresponding author. Email: Daniela.andrei@curtin.edu.au
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Commentaries
Information
Industrial and Organizational Psychology , Volume 12 , Issue 4 , December 2019 , pp. 463 - 468
Copyright
© Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

This research was funded by an Australian Research Council Laureate Fellowship award to the third author, FL160100033. The second author would like to acknowledge grant support from KU Leuven (VKH-C9278-StG/14/035).

References

Campion, M. A., & Stevens, M. J. (1991). Neglected questions in job design: How people design jobs, task-job predictability, and influence of training. Journal of Business and Psychology, 6(2), 169–191. doi: 10.1007/BF01126707CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cirillo, V., & Molero Zayas, J. (2019). Digitalizing industry? Labor, technology and work organization: An introduction to the Forum. Journal of Industrial and Business Economics, 46(3), 313–321. doi: 10.1007/s40812-019-00126-wCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clegg, C., & Spencer, C. (2007). A circular and dynamic model of the process of job design. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 80, 321–339. doi: 10.1348/096317906X113211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frey, C. B., & Osborne, M. A. (2017). The future of employment: How susceptible are jobs to computerisation? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 114, 254–280. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2016.08.019CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodge, J. H., Andrei, D. M., & Klonek, F. E. (2019). The influence of psychological distance on work design behavior. Paper Presented at the 19th Congress of the European Association of Work and Organisational Psychology (EAWOP). Turin, Italy, May 29–June 1.Google Scholar
Holman, D. (2013). An explanation of cross-national variation in call centre job quality using institutional theory. Work, Employment and Society, 27(1), 21–38. doi: 10.1177/0950017012460309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holman, D., Clegg, C., & Waterson, P. (2002). Navigating the territory of job design. Applied Ergonomics, 33(3), 197–205. doi: 10.1016/S0003-6870(02)00015-7CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Holman, D., Lamare, R., Grimshaw, D., Holdsworth, L., & Marchington, M. (2012). The diffusion of ‘good’ HR practices across the supply chain. London, UK: Advisory, Conciliation & Arbitration Service.Google Scholar
Kompier, M., Fekke Ybema, J., Janssen, J., & Taris, T. (2009). Employment contracts: Cross-sectional and longitudinal relations with quality of working life, health and well-being. Journal of Occupational Health, 51, 193–203.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liao, Y., Deschamps, F., Loures, E. de F. R., & Ramos, L. F. P. (2017). Past, present and future of Industry 4.0—a systematic literature review and research agenda proposal. International Journal of Production Research, 55(12), 3609–3629. doi: 10.1080/00207543.2017.1308576CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McIlroy, T. (2016). When power corrupts: The effects of power, dehumanisation and perspective-taking on work design strategies. Perth, WA, Australia: University of Western Australia.Google Scholar
Mumby, D. K. (2019). Work: What is it good for? (Absolutely nothing)—a critical theorist’s perspective. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 12(4), 429–443.Google Scholar
Parker, S. K. (2014). Beyond motivation: Job and work design for development, health, ambidexterity, and more. Annual Review of Psychology, 65(1), 661–691. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115208CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Parker, S. K., Andrei, D. M., & Van den Broeck, A. (2019). Poor work design begets poor work design: Capacity and willingness antecedents of individual work design behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 104(7), 907–928. doi: 10.1037/apl0000383CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Parker, S. K., & Grote, G. (in press). Automation, algorithms, and beyond: Why work design matters more than ever in a digital world. Applied Psychology.Google Scholar
Parker, S. K., Morgeson, F. P., & Johns, G. (2017). One hundred years of work design research: Looking back and looking forward. Journal of Applied Psychology, 102(3), 403–420. doi: 10.1037/apl0000106CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Parker, S. K., Van Den Broeck, A., & Holman, D. (2017). Work design influences: A synthesis of multilevel factors that affect the design of jobs. Management Annals, 11(1), 267–308. doi: 10.5465/annals.2014.0054CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pfeiffer, S. (2017). Industrie 4.0 in the making–discourse patterns and the rise of digital despotism. In Briken, K., Chillas, S., Krzywdzinski, M., & Marks, A. (Eds.), The new digital workplace : How new technologies revolutionise work (pp. 21–41). London, UK: Macmillan International Higher Education.Google Scholar
Rudolph, C. W., Katz, I. M., Lavigne, K. N., & Zacher, H. (2017). Job crafting: A meta-analysis of relationships with individual differences, job characteristics, and work outcomes. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 102, 112–138. doi: 10.1016/j.jvb.2017.05.008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van den Broeck, A., Andrei, D. M., & Parker, S. K. (2019). What predicts top down job design behaviors: A focus on managers. Paper Presented at the 19th Congress of the European Association of Work and Organisational Psychology (EAWOP). Turin, Italy, May 29–June 1.Google Scholar
Vedam, S., Stoll, K., Schummers, L., Rogers, J., & Paine, L. L. (2014). Home birth in North America: Attitudes and practice of US certified nurse-midwives and Canadian registered midwives. Journal of Midwifery & Women’s Health, 59, 141–152.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed