Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T04:32:12.546Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The new age of ethics: University-led education and student-led discussion

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 May 2022

Karyssa A. Courey Open the ORCID record for Karyssa A. Courey [Opens in a new window]  and
Makai A. Ruffin Open the ORCID record for Makai A. Ruffin [Opens in a new window]
Karyssa A. Courey*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychological Sciences, Rice University, Houston, TX, USA
Makai A. Ruffin
Affiliation:
Department of Psychological Sciences, Rice University, Houston, TX, USA
*
*Corresponding author. Email: kac23@rice.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Commentaries
Information
Industrial and Organizational Psychology , Volume 15 , Issue 2 , June 2022 , pp. 250 - 254
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

We thank Fred L. Oswald, Margaret E. Beier, and Felix Y. Wu for their helpful feedback when preparing this commentary.

References

American Psychological Association. (2017). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. http://www.apa.org/ethics/code/index.html Google Scholar
American Psychological Association. (2018). APA guidelines on core learning goals for master’s degree graduates in psychology. http://www.apa.org/about/policy/masters-goals-guidelines.pdf Google Scholar
Banks, G. C., Knapp, D. J., Lin, L., Sanders, C. S., & Grand, J. A. (2022). Ethical decision making in the 21st century: A useful framework for industrial-organizational psychologists. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 15(2), 220–235.Google Scholar
Bayrak, T. (2020). A content analysis of top-ranked universities’ mission statements from five global regions. International Journal of Educational Development, 72, 102–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2019.102130 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bing, M. N., Davison, H. K., Vitell, S. J., Ammeter, A. P., Garner, B. L., & Novicevic, M. M. (2012). An experimental investigation of an interactive model of academic cheating among business school students. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 11(1), 28–48. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2010.0057 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Craft, J. L. (2018). Common thread: The impact of mission on ethical business. A case study. Journal of Business Ethics, 149(1), 127–145. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3034-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dufresne, R. L. (2004). An action learning perspective on effective implementation of academic honor codes. Group & Organization Management, 29(2), 201–218. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601103261472 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fiesler, C., Garrett, N., & Beard, N. (2020, February). What do we teach when we teach tech ethics? A syllabi analysis. SIGCSE ’20, Proceedings of the 51st ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA. https://doi.org/10.1145/3328778.3366825 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffith, S. M., Domenech Rodríguez, M. M., & Anderson, A. J. (2014). Graduate ethics education: A content analysis of syllabi. Training and Education in Professional Psychology, 8(4), 248–252. https://doi.org/10.1037/tep0000036 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCabe, D. L., & Treviño, L. K. (1993). Academic dishonesty: Honor codes and other contextual influence. Journal of Higher Education, 64(5), 522–538. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.1993.11778446 Google Scholar
McCabe, D. L., Treviño, L. K., & Butterfield, K. D. (2001). Dishonesty in academic environments: The influence of peer reporting requirements. Journal of Higher Education, 72(1), 29–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2001.11778863 Google Scholar
Nosek, B. A., Alter, G., Banks, G. C., Borsboom, D., Bowman, S. D., Breckler, S. J., Buck, S., Chambers, C. D., Chin, G., Christensen, G., Contestabile, M., Dafoe, A., Eich, E., Freese, J., Glennerster, R., Goroff, D., Green, D. P., Hesse, B., Humphreys, M., … Yarkoni, T. (2015). Promoting an open research culture. Science, 348(6242), 1422–1425. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aab2374 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nosek, B. A., Spies, J. R., & Motyl, M. (2012). Scientific Utopia: II. Restructuring incentives and practices to promote truth over publishability. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 615–631. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612459058 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rose, S. L., & Pietri, C. E. (2003). Workers as research subjects: A vulnerable population. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 45(1), 3–4. https://doi.org/10.1097/00043764-200301000-00005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology. (2016). Guidelines for education and training in industrial-organizational psychology. https://www.siop.org/Events-Education/Graduate-Training-Program/Guidelines-for-Education-and-Training Google Scholar
Zucchero, R. A. (2008). Can psychology ethics effectively be integrated into introductory psychology? Journal of Academic Ethics, 6(3), 245–257. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-009-9070-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar