Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T12:24:30.983Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

SIOP as Advocate: Developing a Platform for Action

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 January 2015

Douglas H. Reynolds  and
Deirdre J. Knapp
Douglas H. Reynolds*
Affiliation:
Development Dimensions International
Deirdre J. Knapp
Affiliation:
Human Resources Research Organization
*
E-mail: Doug.Reynolds@DDIWorld.com, Address: Development Dimensions International, 1225 Washington Pike, Bridgeville, PA 15017
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Commentaries
Information
Industrial and Organizational Psychology , Volume 4 , Issue 4 , December 2011 , pp. 540 - 544
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology 2011 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education. (1999). Standards for educational and psychological testing (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association. Google Scholar
Berry, J. M. (2004). A needless silence: American nonprofits and the right to lobby. The International Journal of Not-for-Profit Law, 6. Retrieved from http://www.icnl.org/knowledge/ijnl/vol6iss2/special_6.htm.Google Scholar
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Civil Service Commission, Department of Labor, & Department of Justice. (1978). Uniform guidelines on employee selection procedures. Federal Register, 43, 38290–39315. Google Scholar
McDaniel, M. A. (2011, April). Abolish the Uniform Guidelines. Panel discussion at the 26th Annual Conference of the Society of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Chicago.Google Scholar
McDaniel, M. A., Kepes, S., & Banks, G. C. (2011). The Uniform Guidelines are a detriment to the field of personnel selection. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 4, 494–514.Google Scholar
Reilly, J. F., & Allen, B. A. B. (2003). Political campaign and lobbying activities of IRC 501(c)(4), (c)(5), and (c)(6) organizations. IRS publication. Retrieved from http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-tege/eotopicl03.pdf.Google Scholar
Reynolds, D. H. (2004). EEOC and OFCCP guidance on defining a job applicant in the internet age: SIOP's response. The Industrial-Organizational Psychologist, 42, 127–138. Google Scholar
Reynolds, D. H. (2006). OFCCP's guidance on defining a job applicant in the internet age: The final word? The Industrial-Organizational Psychologist, 43, 107–113.Google Scholar
Reynolds, D. H., & Dunleavy, E. M. (2011). SIOP recommends review of Uniform Guidelines. The Industrial-Organizational Psychologist, 49, 38–41. Google Scholar
Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology (SIOP). (2003). Principles for the validation and use of personnel selection procedures (4th ed.). Bowling Green, OH: Author.Google Scholar