Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T04:08:01.587Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Unproctored Internet-Based Tests of Cognitive Ability and Personality: Magnitude of Cheating and Response Distortion

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 January 2015

Winfred Arthur Jr ,
Ryan M. Glaze ,
Anton J. Villado  and
Jason E. Taylor
Winfred Arthur Jr*
Affiliation:
Texas A&M University
Ryan M. Glaze
Affiliation:
Texas A&M University
Anton J. Villado
Affiliation:
Texas A&M University
Jason E. Taylor
Affiliation:
People Answers, Inc.
*
E-mail: w-arthur@tamu.edu, Address: Department of Psychology, Texas A&M University, 4235 TAMU, College Station, TX 77843-4235
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Commentaries
Information
Industrial and Organizational Psychology , Volume 2 , Issue 1 , March 2009 , pp. 39 - 45
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology 2009 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Department of Psychology, Texas A&M University

References

Arthur, W. Jr., Glaze, R. M., Villado, A. J., & Taylor, J. E. (2009). The magnitude and extent of cheating and response distortion effects on unproctored internet-based tests of cognitive ability and personality. Manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar
Birkeland, S. A., Manson, T. M., Kisamore, J. L., Brannick, M. T., & Smith, M. A. (2006). A meta-analytic investigation of job applicant faking on personality measures. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 14, 317–335.Google Scholar
Cizek, G. J. (1999). Cheating on tests: How to do it, detect it, and prevent it. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Edens, P. S., & Arthur, W. Jr. (2000). A meta-analysis investigating the susceptibility of self-report inventories to distortion. Paper presented at the 15th annual conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, New Orleans, LA.Google Scholar
Ellingson, J. E., Sackett, P. R., & Connelly, B. S. (2007). Personality assessment across selection and development contexts: Insights into response distortion. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 386–395.Google Scholar
Griffith, R. L., Chmielowski, T., & Yoshita, Y. (2007). Do applicants fake? An examination of the frequency of applicant faking behavior. Personnel Review, 36, 341–355.Google Scholar
Hausknecht, J. P., Halpert, J. A., Di Paolo, N. T., & Moriarty-Gerrard, M. O. (2007). Retesting in selection: A meta-analysis of coaching and practice effects for tests of cognitive ability. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 373–385.Google Scholar
Hogan, J., Barrett, P., & Hogan, R. (2007). Personality measurement, faking, and employment selection. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 1270–1285.Google Scholar
Hough, L. M. (1998). Effects of intentional distortion in personality measurement and evaluation of suggested palliatives. Human Performance, 11, 209–244.Google Scholar
Nye, C. D., Do, B., Drasgow, F., & Fine, S. (2008). Two-step testing in employee selection: Is score inflation a problem? International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 16, 112–120.Google Scholar
Tippins, N. T. (2009). Internet alternatives to traditional proctored testing: Where are we now? Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 2, 2–10.Google Scholar
Viswesvaran, C., & Ones, D. S. (1999). Meta-analyses of fakability estimates: Implications for personality measurement. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 59, 197–210.Google Scholar
Whitley, B. E. (1998). Factors associated with cheating among college students: A review. Research in Higher Education, 39, 235–274.Google Scholar