Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T19:08:34.639Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Value of Virtue: An Organizational Approach to the Challenges of Workplace Disabilities

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 January 2015

Jason D. Whitt ,
Brian D. Cawley ,
Julie E. Yonker  and
Danielle C. Polage
Jason D. Whitt
Affiliation:
Baylor University
Brian D. Cawley*
Affiliation:
Calvin College
Julie E. Yonker
Affiliation:
Calvin College
Danielle C. Polage
Affiliation:
Central Washington University
*
E-mail: bcawley@calvin.edu, Address: Department of Business, Calvin College, Grand Rapids, MI 49546
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Commentaries
Information
Industrial and Organizational Psychology , Volume 7 , Issue 2 , June 2014 , pp. 265 - 269
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barclay, L. A., Markel, K. S., & Yugo, J. (2012). Virtue theory and organizations: Considering persons with disabilities. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 27(4), 330–346.Google Scholar
Cameron, K. S. (2008). Positively deviant organizational performance and the role of leadership values. The Journal of Values Based Leadership, 1(1), 67–83.Google Scholar
Cameron, K. S. (2011). The effects of virtuous leadership in organizational performance. In Donaldson, S. I., Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Nakamura, J. (Eds.), Applied positive psychology: Improving everyday life, schools, work, health, and society. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cameron, K. S., Bright, D., & Caza, A. (2004). Exploring the relationships between organizational virtuousness and performance. American Behavioral Scientist, 47, 766–790.Google Scholar
Caza, A., Barker, B. A., & Cameron, K. (2004). Ethics and ethos: The buffering and amplifying effects of ethical behavior and virtuousness and performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 52, 169–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cushing, P. (2010). Disability attitudes, cultural conditions, and the moral imagination. In H. S. (Ed.), The paradox of disability: Responses to Jean Vanier and L'Arche communities from theology and the sciences (pp. 75–93). Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans.Google Scholar
Hambrick, D. C., & Mason, P. A. (1984). Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of Management Review, April, 193–206.Google Scholar
Lewis, S. (2011). Positive psychology at work: How positive leadership and appreciative inquiry create inspiring organizations. West Sussex, England: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Louis Harris and Associates (1991). NOD survey of public attitudes toward people with disabilities. Washington, DC: National Organization on Disability.Google Scholar
Makas, E. (1993). Getting in touch: The relationship between contact with and attitudes toward people with disabilities. In Nagler, M. (Ed.), Perspectives on disability (2nd ed., pp. 121–136). Palo Alto, CA: Health Markets Research.Google Scholar
Meyers, M. C., vanWoerkom, M., & Bakker, A. B. (2013). The added value of the positive: A literature review of positive psychology interventions in organizations. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 22(5), 618–632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peterson, C., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2004). Character strengths and virtues: A handbook and classification. Washington, DC: APA Press and Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Santuzzi, A. M., Waltz, P. R., Finkelstein, L. M., & Rupp, D. E. (2014). Invisible disabilities: Unique challenges for employees and organizations. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 7(2), 204–219.Google Scholar
Schneider, B. (1987). The people make the place. Personnel Psychology, 40, 437–454.Google Scholar
U.S. Census Bureau. (2010). 20th anniversary of Americans with Disabilities Act: July 26. Retrieved from http://www.census.gov/newsroom/releases/archives/facts_for_features_special_editions/cb10-ff13.htmlGoogle Scholar