Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T01:45:53.616Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Spatiotemporal clustering of in-hospital Clostridioides difficile infection

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2020

Shreyas Pai ,
Philip M. Polgreen Open the ORCID record for Philip M. Polgreen [Opens in a new window] ,
Alberto Maria Segre ,
Daniel K. Sewell ,
Sriram V. Pemmaraju  and
for the CDC MInD-Healthcare group
Shreyas Pai
Affiliation:
Department of Computer Science, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa
Philip M. Polgreen*
Affiliation:
Departments of Internal Medicine and Epidemiology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa
Alberto Maria Segre
Affiliation:
Department of Computer Science, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa
Daniel K. Sewell
Affiliation:
Department of Biostatistics, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa
Sriram V. Pemmaraju
Affiliation:
Department of Computer Science, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa
*
Author for correspondence: Philip M. Polgreen, E-mail: Philip-polgreen@uiowa.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective:

To determine whether Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) exhibits spatiotemporal interaction and clustering.

Design:

Retrospective observational study.

Setting:

The University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics.

Patients:

This study included 1,963 CDI cases, January 2005 through December 2011.

Methods:

We extracted location and time information for each case and ran the Knox, Mantel, and mean and maximum component size tests for time thresholds (T = 7, 14, and 21 days) and distance thresholds (D = 2, 3, 4, and 5 units; 1 unit = 5–6 m). All tests were implemented using Monte Carlo simulations, and random CDI cases were constructed by randomly permuting times of CDI cases 20,000 times. As a counterfactual, we repeated all tests on 790 aspiration pneumonia cases because aspiration pneumonia is a complication without environmental factors.

Results:

Results from the Knox test and mean component size test rejected the null hypothesis of no spatiotemporal interaction (P < .0001), for all values of T and D. Results from the Mantel test also rejected the hypothesis of no spatiotemporal interaction (P < .0003). The same tests showed no such effects for aspiration pneumonia. Our results from the maximum component size tests showed similar trends, but they were not consistently significant, possibly because CDI outbreaks attributable to the environment were relatively small.

Conclusion:

Our results clearly show spatiotemporal interaction and clustering among CDI cases and none whatsoever for aspiration pneumonia cases. These results strongly suggest that environmental factors play a role in the onset of some CDI cases. However, our results are not inconsistent with the possibility that many genetically unrelated CDI cases occurred during the study period.

Type
Original Article
Information
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology , Volume 41 , Issue 4 , April 2020 , pp. 418 - 424
Copyright
© 2020 by The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America. All rights reserved

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

PREVIOUS PRESENTATION: The work described in this manuscript was presented in part as poster #509, “Spatio-Temporal Clustering of CDI Cases at the University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics,” at IDWeek 2018 on October 4, 2018, in San Francisco, California.

References

Magill, SS, Edwards, JR, Bamberg, W, et al.Multistate point-prevalence survey of health care-associated infections. N Engl J Med 2014;370:1198–1208.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Evans, CT, Safdar, N. Current trends in the epidemiology and outcomes of Clostridium difficile infection. Clin Infect Dis 2015;60 suppl 2:S66–S71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kwon, JH, Olsen, MA, Dubberke, ER. The morbidity, mortality, and costs associated with Clostridium difficile infection. Infect Dis Clin N Am 2015;29:123–134.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kyne, L, Hamel, MB, Polavaram, R, Kelly, CP. Healthcare costs and mortality associated with nosocomial diarrhea due to Clostridium difficile. Clin Infect Dis 2002;34:346–353.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stevens, V, Dumyati, G, Fine, LS, Fisher, SG, van Wijngaarden, E. Cumulative antibiotic exposures over time and the risk of Clostridium difficile infection. Clin Infect Dis 2011;53:42–48.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brown, KA, Khanafer, N, Daneman, N, Fisman, DN. Meta-analysis of antibiotics and the risk of community-associated Clostridium difficile infection. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2013;57:2326–2332.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McDonald, LC, Owings, M, Jernigan, DB. Clostridium difficile infection in patients discharged from US short-stay hospitals, 1996–2003. Emerg Infect Dis 2006;12:409–415.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pepin, J, Valiquette, L, Cossette, B. Mortality attributable to nosocomial Clostridium difficile–associated disease during an epidemic caused by a hypervirulent strain in Quebec. CMAJ 2005;173:1037–1042.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Campbell, RR, Beere, D, Wilcock, GK, Brown, EM. Clostridium difficile in acute and long-stay elderly patients. Age Ageing 1988;17:333–336.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Howell, MD, Novack, V, Grgurich, P, et al.Iatrogenic gastric acid suppression and the risk of nosocomial Clostridium difficile infection. Arch Intern Med 2010;170:784–790.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dubberke, ER, Reske, KA, Olsen, MA, et al.Evaluation of Clostridium difficile–associated disease pressure as a risk factor for C. difficile–associated disease. Arch Intern Med 2007;167:1092–1097.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miller, AC, Polgreen, LA, Cavanaugh, JE, Polgreen, PM. Hospital Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) incidence as a risk factor for hospital-associated CDI. Am J Infect Control 2016;44:825–829.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gerding, DN, Johnson, S, Peterson, LR, Mulligan, ME, Silva, J, Jr . Clostridium difficile–associated diarrhea and colitis. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1995;16:459–477.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kim, KH, Fekety, R, Batts, DH, et al.Isolation of Clostridium difficile from the environment and contacts of patients with antibiotic-associated colitis. J Infect Dis 1981;143:42–50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bobulsky, GS, Al-Nassir, WN, Riggs, MM, Sethi, AK, Donskey, CJ. Clostridium difficile skin contamination in patients with C. difficile–associated disease. Clin Infect Dis 2008;46:447–450.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sethi, AK, Al-Nassir, WN, Nerandzic, MM, Bobulsky, GS, Donskey, CJ. Persistence of skin contamination and environmental shedding of Clostridium difficile during and after treatment of C. difficile infection. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2010;31:21–27.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Landelle, C, Verachten, M, Legrand, P, Girou, E, Barbut, F, Brun-Buisson, C. Contamination of healthcare workers’ hands with Clostridium difficile spores after caring for patients with C. difficile infection. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2014;35:10–15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shrestha, SK, Sunkesula, VC, Kundrapu, S, Tomas, ME, Nerandzic, MM, Donskey, CJ. Acquisition of Clostridium difficile on hands of healthcare personnel caring for patients with resolved C. difficile infection. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2016;37:475–477.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shaughnessy, MK, Micielli, RL, DePestel, DD, et al.Evaluation of hospital room assignment and acquisition of Clostridium difficile infection. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2011;32:201–206.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McDonald, LC, Gerding, DN, Johnson, S, et al.Clinical practice guidelines for Clostridium difficile infection in adults and children: 2017 update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) and Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America (SHEA). Clin Infect Dis 2018;66:e1–e48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eyre, DW, Cule, ML, Wilson, DJ, et al.Diverse sources of C. difficile infection identified on whole-genome sequencing. N Engl J Med 2013;369:1195–1205.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tschudin–Sutter, S, Carroll, KC, Tamma, PD, et al.Impact of toxigenic Clostridium difficile colonization on the risk of subsequent C. difficile infection in intensive care unit patients. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2015;36:1324–1329.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bruminhent, J, Wang, ZX, Hu, C, et al.Clostridium difficile colonization and disease in patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Biol Blood Marrow Transpl 2014;20:1329–1334.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, CM, Le Comber, SC, Fry, H, Bull, M, Leach, S, Hayward, AC. Spatial methods for infectious disease outbreak investigations: systematic literature review. Euro Surveill 2015;20.Google ScholarPubMed
Curtis, DE, Hlady, CS, Kanade, G, Pemmaraju, SV, Polgreen, PM, Segre, AM. Healthcare worker contact networks and the prevention of hospital-acquired infections. PloS One 2013;8:e79906.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Knox, G. The detection of space–time interactions. Applied Statistics 1964;13:25–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Takaguchi, T, Masuda, N, Holme, P. Bursty communication patterns facilitate spreading in a threshold-based epidemic dynamics. PloS One 2013;8:e68629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Akbarpour, M, Jackson, MO. Diffusion in networks and the virtue of burstiness. Proc Nat Acad Sci U S A 2018;115:e6996–e7004.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cao, J. Th size of the connected components of excursion sets of X2, t and F fields. Adv in Appl Prob 1999;31:579–595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mantel, N. The detection of disease clustering and a generalized regression approach. Cancer Res 1967;27:209–220.Google Scholar
Bartlett, JG. How important are anaerobic bacteria in aspiration pneumonia: when should they be treated and what is optimal therapy. Infect Dis Clin N Am 2013;27:149–155.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ottosen, J, Evans, H. Pneumonia: challenges in the definition, diagnosis, and management of disease. Surg Clin N Am 2014;94:1305–1317.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bowerman, TJ, Zhang, J, Waite, LM. Antibacterial treatment of aspiration pneumonia in older people: a systematic review. Clin Intervent Aging 2018;13:2201–2213.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Polgreen, PM, Yang, M, Bohnett, LC, Cavanaugh, JE. A time-series analysis of Clostridium difficile and its seasonal association with influenza. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2010;31:382–387.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stiller, A, Salm, F, Bischoff, P, Gastmeier, P. Relationship between hospital ward design and healthcare-associated infection rates: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control 2016;5:51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dettenkofer, M, Seegers, S, Antes, G, Motschall, E, Schumacher, M, Daschner, FD. Does the architecture of hospital facilities influence nosocomial infection rates? A systematic review. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2004;25:21–25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rexach, CE, Tang-Feldman, YJ, Cohen, SH. Spatial and temporal analysis of Clostridium difficile infection in patients at a pediatric hospital in California. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2005;26:691–696.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hornbeck, T, Naylor, D, Segre, AM, Thomas, G, Herman, T, Polgreen, PM. Using sensor networks to study the effect of peripatetic healthcare workers on the spread of hospital-associated infections. J Infect Dis 2012;206:1549–1557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Pai et al. supplementary material

Pai et al. supplementary material

Download Pai et al. supplementary material(File)
File 83.2 KB