Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-05T22:28:01.660Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A comparison of methods for microbiologic environmental sampling

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 December 2022

Sharon C. Thompson Open the ORCID record for Sharon C. Thompson [Opens in a new window] ,
William A. Rutala ,
Emily E. Sickbert-Bennett ,
Lauren M. DiBiase ,
Deverick J. Anderson Open the ORCID record for Deverick J. Anderson [Opens in a new window] ,
David J. Weber  and
for the Centers of Disease Control and Prevention Epicenters Program
Sharon C. Thompson*
Affiliation:
Infection Prevention, University of North Carolina Medical Center, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
William A. Rutala
Affiliation:
Infection Prevention, University of North Carolina Medical Center, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
Emily E. Sickbert-Bennett
Affiliation:
Infection Prevention, University of North Carolina Medical Center, Chapel Hill, North Carolina Division of Infectious Diseases, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
Lauren M. DiBiase
Affiliation:
Infection Prevention, University of North Carolina Medical Center, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
Deverick J. Anderson
Affiliation:
Duke Center for Antimicrobial Stewardship and Infection Prevention, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
David J. Weber
Affiliation:
Infection Prevention, University of North Carolina Medical Center, Chapel Hill, North Carolina Division of Infectious Diseases, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
*
Author for correspondence: Sharon C. Thompson, E-mail: sharon.thompson@unchealth.unc.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We compared the effectiveness of 4 sampling methods to recover Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella pneumoniae and Clostridioides difficile from contaminated environmental surfaces: cotton swabs, RODAC culture plates, sponge sticks with manual agitation, and sponge sticks with a stomacher. Organism type was the most important factor in bacterial recovery.

Type
Concise Communication
Information
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology , Volume 44 , Issue 9 , September 2023 , pp. 1502 - 1504
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Rutala, WA, Weber, DJ. Disinfection and sterilization in health care facilities: an overview and current issues. Infect Dis Clin North Am 2016;30:609–637.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rutala, WA, Weber, DJ. Best practices for disinfection of noncritical environmental surfaces and equipment in healthcare facilities: a bundle approach. Am J Infect Control 2019;47:A96–A105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weber, DJ, Anderson, D, Rutala, WA. The role of the surface environment in healthcare-associated infections. Curr Opin Infect Dis 2013;26:338–344.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rutala, WA, Kanamori, H, Gergen, MF, et al. Enhanced disinfection leads to reduction of microbial contamination and a decrease in patient colonization and infection. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2018;39:1118–1121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
US Environmental Protection Agency. Standard Operation Procedure for Production of Spores of Clostridium difficile for Use in the Efficacy Evaluation of Antimicrobial Agents. Fort Meade, MD: Office of Pesticide Programs, Microbiology Laboratory, Environmental Science Center, SOP no. MB-28-04; 2014.Google Scholar
Downey, AS, Da Silva, SM, Olson, ND, Filliben, JJ, Morrow, JB. Impact of processing method on recovery of bacteria from wipes used in biological surface sampling. Appl Environ Microbiol 2012;78:5872–5881.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rawlinson, S, Ciric, L, Cloutman-Green, E. How to carry out microbiological sampling of healthcare environmental surfaces? A review of current evidence. J Hosp Infect 2019;103:363–374.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Buttner, MP, Cruz, P, Stetzenbach, LD, Cronin, T. Evaluation of two surface sampling methods for detection of Erwinia herbicola on a variety of materials by culture and quantitative PCR. Appl Environ Microbiol 2007;73:3505–3510.10.1128/AEM.01825-06CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Li, L, Mendis, N, Trigui, H, Oliver, JD, Faucher, SP. The importance of the viable but nonculturable state in human bacterial pathogens. Front Microbiol 2014;5:258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar