Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T11:06:02.757Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effect of antibiotic time-outs on modification of antibiotic prescriptions in nursing homes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 April 2020

Chi-Yin Liao
Affiliation:
University of Wisconsin School of Pharmacy, Social & Administrative Sciences Division, Madison, Wisconsin
David A. Nace
Affiliation:
University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
Christopher J. Crnich
Affiliation:
University of Wisconsin School of Medicine & Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin William S. Middleton Veterans’ Affairs Hospital, Madison, Wisconsin
Mozhdeh Bahrainian
Affiliation:
University of Wisconsin School of Medicine & Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin
James H. Ford II*
Affiliation:
University of Wisconsin School of Pharmacy, Social & Administrative Sciences Division, Madison, Wisconsin
*
Author for correspondence: James H. Ford II, E-mail: jhfordii@wisc.edu

Abstract

Background:

Antibiotic overuse and misuse is a common problem in nursing homes. Antibiotic time-out (ATO) interventions have led to improvements in antibiotic uses in hospitals, but their impact in nursing homes remain understudied.

Objective:

To evaluate the impact of a stewardship intervention, promoting use of ATOs on the frequency and types of antibiotic change events (ACEs) in nursing homes.

Design:

Controlled before-and-after intervention study.

Setting:

Nursing homes in Wisconsin and Pennsylvania.

Method:

Data on antibiotic prescriptions in 11 nursing homes were collected for 25 months. We categorized ACEs as (1) early discontinuation, (2) class modification, or (3) administration modification. Class modification ACEs were further classified based on whether the change narrowed, expanded, or had no effect on bacterial spectrum coverage. Analyses were performed using a difference-in-difference (DiD) approach.

Result:

Of 2,647 antibiotic events initiated in study nursing homes, 376 (14.2%) were associated with an ACE. The overall proportion of ACEs did not significantly differ between intervention and control nursing homes. Early discontinuation ACEs increased in intervention nursing homes (DiD, 2.5%; P = .01), primarily affecting residents initiated on broad-spectrum antibiotics (DiD, 2.9%; P < .01). Class modification ACEs decreased in intervention nursing homes but remained unchanged in control nursing homes.

Conclusion:

The impact of an ATO intervention in study nursing homes was mixed with increases in early discontinuation ACEs offset by reductions in class modification ACEs. More research on the potential value of ATO interventions in nursing homes is warranted.

Type
Original Article
Copyright
© 2020 by The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America. All rights reserved.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

PREVIOUS PRESENTATION: Data from this study were presented at the ID Week conference on October 5, 2019, in Washington, DC.

References

Benoit, SR, Nsa, W, Richards, CL, et al.Factors associated with antimicrobial use in nursing homes: a multilevel model. J Am Geriatr Soc 2008;56:20392044.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harris-Kojetin, L, Sengupta, M, Park-Lee, E, Valverde, R. Long-term care services in the United States: 2013 overview. Vital Health Stat 3 2013:1107.Google ScholarPubMed
Thompson, ND, LaPlace, L, Epstein, L, et al.Prevalence of antimicrobial use and opportunities to improve prescribing practices in US nursing homes. J Am Med Dir Assoc 2016;17:11511153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pakyz, A, Xa, L, Dwyer, L, Xa, L. Prevalence of antimicrobial use among United States nursing home Residents: results from a national survey. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2010;31:661662.10.1086/653072CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Crnich, CJ, Jump, R, Trautner, B, Sloane, PD, Mody, L. Optimizing antibiotic stewardship in nursing homes: a narrative review and recommendations for improvement. Drugs Aging 2015;32:699716.10.1007/s40266-015-0292-7CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Daneman, N, Bronskill, SE, Gruneir, A, et al.Variability in antibiotic use across nursing homes and the risk of antibiotic-related adverse outcomes for individual residents. JAMA Intern Med 2015;175:13311339.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McElligott, M, Welham, G, Pop-Vicas, A, Taylor, L, Crnich, CJ. Antibiotic stewardship in nursing facilities. Infect Dis Clin North Am 2017;31:619638.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eure, T, LaPlace, LL, Melchreit, R, et al.Measuring antibiotic appropriateness for urinary tract infections in nursing home residents. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2017;38:9981001.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sloane, PD, Zimmerman, S, Reed, D, et al.Antibiotic prescribing in 4 assisted-living communities: incidence and potential for improvement. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2014;35 suppl 3:S62S68.10.1086/677821CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vergidis, P, Hamer, DH, Meydani, SN, Dallal, GE, Barlam, TF. Patterns of antimicrobial use for respiratory tract infections in older residents of long-term care facilities. J Am Geriatr Soc 2011;59:10931098.10.1111/j.1532-5415.2011.03406.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lim, CJ, Kwong, M, Stuart, RL, et al.Antimicrobial stewardship in residential aged care facilities: need and readiness assessment. BMC Infect Dis 2014;14:410.10.1186/1471-2334-14-410CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Palms, DL, Kabbani, S, Bell, JM, Anttila, A, Hicks, LA, Stone, ND. Implementation of the core elements of antibiotic stewardship in nursing homes enrolled in the national healthcare safety network. Clin Infect Dis 2019;69:12351238.10.1093/cid/ciz102CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roberts, C, Buechel, K, Tobey, K, Evans, C, Talley, P, Kainer, MA. Implementation of the core elements of antibiotic stewardship in long-term care facilities. Am J Infect Control 2018;46:S18S19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanson, AP, Pacilli, M, Xydis, SN, Walblay, K, Black, SR. GAIN (Generating Antimicrobial Stewardship Initiatives in Chicago Skilled Nursing Facilities) collaborative survey results: CDC core elements of antimicrobial stewardship compliance assessment in 27 Chicago skilled nursing facilities. Open Forum Infect Dis 2019;6:S687S688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Srinivasan, A. Let’s take an antibiotic time out. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention website. https://blogs-origin.cdc.gov/safehealthcare/authors/arjun-srinivasan-md/. Published 2010. Accessed May 6, 2019.Google Scholar
Olans, RN, Olans, RD, DeMaria, A Jr.The critical role of the staff nurse in antimicrobial stewardship—unrecognized, but already there. Clin Infect Dis 2016;62:8489.Google Scholar
Tamma, PD, Miller, MA, Cosgrove, SE. Rethinking how antibiotics are prescribed: incorporating the 4 moments of antibiotic decision making into clinical practice. JAMA 2019;321:139140.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Senn, L, Burnand, B, Francioli, P, Zanetti, G. Improving appropriateness of antibiotic therapy: randomized trial of an intervention to foster reassessment of prescription after 3 days. J Antimicrob Chemother 2004;53:10621067.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lesprit, P, Landelle, C, Girou, E, Brun-Buisson, C. Reassessment of intravenous antibiotic therapy using a reminder or direct counselling. J Antimicrob Chemother 2010;65:789795.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weiss, CH, Dibardino, D, Rho, J, Sung, N, Collander, B, Wunderink, RG. A clinical trial comparing physician prompting with an unprompted automated electronic checklist to reduce empirical antibiotic utilization. Crit Care Med 2013;41:25632569.10.1097/CCM.0b013e318298291aCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Graber, CJ, Jones, MM, Glassman, PA, et al.Taking an antibiotic time-out: utilization and usability of a self-stewardship time-out program for renewal of vancomycin and piperacillin-tazobactam. Hosp Pharm 2015;50:10111024.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thom, KA, Tamma, PD, Harris, AD, et al.Impact of a prescriber-driven antibiotic time-out on antibiotic use in hospitalized patients. Clin Infect Dis 2018;68:15811584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, TC, Frenette, C, Jayaraman, D, Green, L, Pilote, L. Antibiotic self-stewardship: trainee-led structured antibiotic time-outs to improve antimicrobial use. Ann Intern Med 2014;161:S5358.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Crnich, C, Ford, II J, Ramly, E, et al. Improving antibiotic use in nursing homes through delayed action protocols and antibiotic review: results of the Optimizing Antibiotic Stewardship in Skilled Nursing Facilities (OASIS) study. In: Program and abstracts of the Annual Scientific Meeting of the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America (SHEA); April 24–26, 2019; Boston, MA.Google Scholar
Harris, PA, Taylor, R, Thielke, R, Payne, J, Gonzalez, N, Conde, JG. Research electronic data capture (REDCap)—a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform 2009;42:377381.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Feldstein, D, Sloane, PD, Feltner, C. Antibiotic stewardship programs in nursing homes: a systematic review. J Am Med Dir Assoc 2018;19:110116.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hossin, T, Bahranian, M, Taylor, L, Nace, D, Crnich, C. Estimating the impact of post-prescribing review on the quality of antibiotic prescribing in skilled nursing facilities. Open Forum Infect Dis 2017;4:S160S160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Core elements of hospital antibiotic stewardship programs. 2019. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention website. https://www.cdc.gov/antibiotic-use/core-elements/hospital.html. Published 2019. Accessed March 1, 2020.Google Scholar
Fleet, E, Gopal Rao, G, Patel, B, et al.Impact of implementation of a novel antimicrobial stewardship tool on antibiotic use in nursing homes: a prospective cluster randomized control pilot study. J Antimicrob Chemother 2014;69:22652273.10.1093/jac/dku115CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Supplementary material: File

Liao et al. supplementary material

Appendix 3

Download Liao et al. supplementary material(File)
File 3.3 MB
Supplementary material: File

Liao et al. supplementary material

Appendix 4

Download Liao et al. supplementary material(File)
File 1.8 MB
Supplementary material: File

Liao et al. supplementary material

Appendix 1

Download Liao et al. supplementary material(File)
File 24.7 KB
Supplementary material: File

Liao et al. supplementary material

Appendix 2

Download Liao et al. supplementary material(File)
File 33.4 KB