Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T06:47:19.941Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Gown Is a Gown Is a Gown: Or Is It?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Nathan L. Belkin*
Affiliation:
Clearwater, Florida
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Letters to the Editor
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 2003

References

1.Srinivasan, A, Song, X, Ross, T, et al. A prospective study to determine whether cover gowns in addition to gloves decrease nosocomial transmission of vancomycin-resistant enterococci in an intensive care unit. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2002;23:424428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Slaughter, S, Hayden, MK, Nathan, C, et al. A comparison of the effect of universal use of gloves and gowns with that of glove use alone on acquisition of vancomycin-resistant enterococci in a medical intensive care unit. Ann Intern Med 1996;125:448456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Puzniak, LA, Leet, T, Mayfield, J, et al. To gown or not to gown: the effect on acquisition of vancomycin-resistant enterococci. Clin Infect Dis 2002;35:1825.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4.Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee (HICPAC). Recommendations for preventing the spread of vancomycin resistance. MMWR 1995;44(RR12):113.Google Scholar
5.U.S. Department of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health Administration. Occupational exposure to bloodborne pathogens: final rule. Federal Register 1991;56:6400464182.Google Scholar
6.Belkin, NL. Gowns: selection on a procedure-driven basis. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1994;15:713716.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed