Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T04:27:50.307Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Multicenter Intervention to Prevent Catheter-Associated Bloodstream Infections

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 April 2017

David K. Warren ,
Sara E. Cosgrove ,
Daniel J. Diekema ,
Gianna Zuccotti ,
Michael W. Climo ,
Maureen K. Bolon ,
Jerome I. Tokars ,
Gary A. Noskin ,
Edward S. Wong  and
Kent A. Sepkowitz
...Show all authors
David K. Warren*
Affiliation:
Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, Missouri
Sara E. Cosgrove
Affiliation:
Department of Public Health and Hygiene, Johns Hopkins School of Hygiene and Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland
Daniel J. Diekema
Affiliation:
Department of Internal Medicine, University of Iowa College of Medicine, Iowa City, Iowa
Gianna Zuccotti
Affiliation:
Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
Michael W. Climo
Affiliation:
Department of Internal Medicine, Hunter Holmes McGuire Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Richmond, Virginia
Maureen K. Bolon
Affiliation:
Department of Internal Medicine, Northwestern University, Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinoi
Jerome I. Tokars
Affiliation:
Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
Gary A. Noskin
Affiliation:
Department of Internal Medicine, Northwestern University, Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinoi
Edward S. Wong
Affiliation:
Department of Internal Medicine, Hunter Holmes McGuire Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Richmond, Virginia
Kent A. Sepkowitz
Affiliation:
Department of Internal Medicine, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
Loreen A. Herwaldt
Affiliation:
Department of Internal Medicine, University of Iowa College of Medicine, Iowa City, Iowa
Trish M. Perl
Affiliation:
Department of Public Health and Hygiene, Johns Hopkins School of Hygiene and Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland
Steven L. Solomon
Affiliation:
Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
Victoria J. Fraser
Affiliation:
Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, Missouri
*
Washington University School of Medicine, Campus Box 8051, 660 S. Euclid Avenue, Saint Louis, MO 63110 (dwarren@im.wustl.edu)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background.

Education-based interventions can reduce the incidence of catheter-associated bloodstream infection. The generalizability of findings from single-center studies is limited.

Objective.

To assess the effect of a multicenter intervention to prevent catheter-associated bloodstream infections.

Design.

An observational study with a planned intervention.

Setting.

Twelve intensive care units and 1 bone marrow transplantation unit at 6 academic medical centers.

Patients.

Patients admitted during the study period.

Intervention.

Updates of written policies, distribution of a 9-page self-study module with accompanying pretest and posttest, didactic lectures, and incorporation into practice of evidence-based guidelines regarding central venous catheter (CVC) insertion and care.

Measurements.

Standard data collection tools and definitions were used to measure the process of care (ie, the proportion of non-tunneled catheters inserted into the femoral vein and the condition of the CVC insertion site dressing for both tunneled and nontunneled catheters) and the incidence of catheter-associated bloodstream infection.

Results.

Between the preintervention period and the postintervention period, the percentage of CVCs inserted into the femoral vein decreased from 12.9% to 9.4% (relative ratio, 0.73; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.61-0.88); the total proportion of catheter insertion site dressings properly dated increased from 26.6% to 34.4% (relative ratio, 1.29; 95% CI, 1.17-1.42), and the overall rate of catheter-associated bloodstream infections decreased from 11.2 to 8.9 infections per 1,000 catheter-days (relative rate, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.67-0.93). The effect of the intervention varied among individual units.

Conclusions.

An education-based intervention that uses evidence-based practices can be successfully implemented in a diverse group of medical and surgical units and reduce catheter-associated bloodstream infection rates.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology , Volume 27 , Issue 7 , July 2006 , pp. 662 - 669
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance (NNIS) System report: data summary from January 1992–June 2001. Issued August 2001. Am J Infect Control 2001; 29:404–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Raad, I. Intravascular-catheter–related infections. Lancet 1998; 351:893–898.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3.Crnich, CJ, Maki, DG. The promise of novel technology for the prevention of intravascular device-related bloodstream infection. I. Pathogenesis and short-term devices. Clin Infect Dis 2002; 34:1232–1242.Google Scholar
4.Darouiche, RO, Raad, II, Heard, SO, et al. A comparison of two antimicrobial-impregnated central venous catheters. Catheter Study Group. N Engl J Med 1999; 340:1–8.Google Scholar
5.Heard, SO, Wagle, M, Vijayakumar, E, et al. Influence of triple-lumen central venous catheters coated with chlorhexidine and silver sulfadiazine on the incidence of catheter-related bacteremia. Arch Intern Med 1998; 158:81–87.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6.Raad, I, Darouiche, R, Dupuis, J, et al. Central venous catheters coated with minocycline and rifampin for the prevention of catheter-related colonization and bloodstream infections: a randomized, double-blind trial. The Texas Medical Center Catheter Study Group. Ann Intern Med 1997; 127:267–274.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7.Veenstra, DL, Saint, S, Saha, S, et al. Efficacy of antiseptic-impregnated central venous catheters in preventing catheter-related bloodstream infection: a meta-analysis. JAMA 1999; 281:261–267.Google Scholar
8.Raad, II, Hohn, DC, Gilbreath, BJ, et al. Prevention of central venous catheter-related infections by using maximal sterile barrier precautions during insertion. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1994; 15:231–228.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9.Mermel, LA, McCormick, RD, Springman, SR, et al. The pathogenesis and epidemiology of catheter-related infection with pulmonary artery Swan-Ganz catheters: a prospective study utilizing molecular subtyping. Am J Med 1991; 91:197S–205S.Google Scholar
10.Merrer, J, De Jonghe, B, Golliot, F, et al. Complications of femoral and subclavian venous catheterization in critically ill patients: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2001; 286:700–707.Google Scholar
11.Goetz, AM, Wagener, MM, Miller, JM, et al. Risk of infection due to central venous catheters: effect of site of placement and catheter type. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1998; 19:842–845.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12.Cobb, DK, High, KP, Sawyer, RG, et al. A controlled trial of scheduled replacement of central venous and pulmonary-artery catheters. N Engl J Med 1992; 327:1062–1068.Google Scholar
13.Cook, D, Randolph, A, Kernerman, P, et al. Central venous catheter replacement strategies: a systematic review of the literature. Crit Care Med 1997; 25:1417–1424.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14.Bingen, E, Barc, MC, Brahimi, N, et al. Randomly amplified polymorphic DNA analysis provides rapid differentiation of methicillin-resistant coagulase-negative staphylococcus bacteremia isolates in pediatric hospital. J Clin Microbiol 1995; 33:1657–1659.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15.Pratt, RJ, Pellowe, C, Loveday, HP, et al. The Epic Project: developing national evidence-based guidelines for preventing healthcare associated infections. J Hosp Infect 2001; 47:S3–S4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16.O'Grady, NP, Alexander, M, Dellinger, EP, et al. Guidelines for the prevention of intravascular catheter–related infections. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. MMWR Recomm Rep 2002; 51:1–29.Google ScholarPubMed
17.Parras, F, Ena, J, Bouza, E, et al. Impact of an educational program for the prevention of colonization of intravascular catheters. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1994; 15:239–242.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18.Maas, A, Flament, P, Pardou, A, et al. Central venous catheter–related bacteraemia in critically ill neonates: risk factors and impact of a prevention programme. J Hosp Infect 1998; 40:211–224.Google Scholar
19.Eggimann, P, Harbarth, S, Constantin, MN, et al. Impact of a prevention strategy targeted at vascular-access care on incidence of infections acquired in intensive care. Lancet 2000; 355:1864–1868.Google Scholar
20.Sherertz, RJ, Ely, EW, Westbrook, DM, et al. Education of physicians-in-training can decrease the risk for vascular catheter infection. Ann Intern Med 2000; 132:641–648.Google Scholar
21.Coopersmith, CM, Rebmann, TL, Zack, JE, et al. Effect of an education program on decreasing catheter-related bloodstream infections in the surgical intensive care unit. Crit Care Med 2002; 30:59–64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
22.Warren, DK, Zack, JE, Cox, MJ, et al. An educational intervention to prevent catheter-associated bloodstream infections in a non-teaching, community medical center. Crit Care Med 2003; 31:1959–1963.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23.Rosenthal, VD, Guzman, S, Pezzotto, SM, et al. Effect of an infection control program using education and performance feedback on rates of intravascular device–associated bloodstream infections in intensive care units in Argentina. Am J Infect Control 2003; 31:405–409.Google Scholar
24.Warren, DK, Zack, JE, Mayfield, JL, et al. The effect of an education program on the incidence of central venous catheter–associated bloodstream infection in a medical ICU. Chest 2004; 126:1612–1618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25.Garner, JS, Jarvis, WR, Emori, TG, et al. CDC definitions for nosocomial infections, 1988. Am J Infect Control 1988; 16:128–140.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
26.Rosner, B. Fundamentals of Biostatistics. 5th ed. Pacific Grove, CA; Duxbury Press; 2000.Google Scholar
27.Oliver, MJ, Callery, SM, Thorpe, KE, et al. Risk of bacteremia from temporary hemodialysis catheters by site of insertion and duration of use: a prospective study. Kidney Int 2000; 58:2543–2545.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
28.Seto, WH, Ching, PT, Fung, JP, et al. The role of communication in the alteration of patient-care practices in hospital: a prospective study. J Hosp Infect 1989; 14:29–37.Google Scholar
29.Seto, WH, Ching, TY, Yuen, KY, et al. The enhancement of infection control in-service education by ward opinion leaders. Am J Infect Control 1991; 19:86–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
30.Renaud, B, Brun-Buisson, C. Outcomes of primary and catheter-related bacteremia: a cohort and case-control study in critically ill patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2001; 163:1584–1590.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
31.Rello, J, Ochagavia, A, Sabanes, E, et al. Evaluation of outcome of intravenous catheter-related infections in critically ill patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2000; 162:1027–1030.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
32.Dimick, JB, Pelz, RK, Consunji, R, et al. Increased resource use associated with catheter-related bloodstream infection in the surgical intensive care unit. Arch Surg 2001; 136:229–234.Google Scholar
33.Digiovine, B, Chenoweth, C, Watts, C, et al. The attributable mortality and costs of primary nosocomial bloodstream infections in the intensive care unit. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1999; 160:976–981.Google Scholar